GeForce GTX 970M vs MX570 A

Aggregate performance score

We've compared GeForce MX570 A with GeForce GTX 970M, including specs and performance data.

MX570 A
2022
2 GB GDDR6, 25 Watt
15.43
+3.8%

MX570 A outperforms GTX 970M by a minimal 4% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in performance ranking323334
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data4.14
ArchitectureAmpere (2020−2022)Maxwell (2014−2018)
GPU code nameGA107GM204
Market segmentDesktopLaptop
Release dateMay 2022 (2 years ago)7 October 2014 (9 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$2,560.89
Current price$1574 $848 (0.3x MSRP)

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores20481280
CUDA coresno data1280
Core clock speedno data924 MHz
Boost clock speed1155 MHz1038 MHz
Number of transistorsno data5,200 million
Manufacturing process technology8 nm28 nm
Power consumption (TDP)25 Wattunknown
Texture fill rate73.9283.04
Floating-point performanceno data2,657 gflops

Form factor & compatibility

Information on GeForce MX570 A and GeForce GTX 970M compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop video cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility). For notebook video cards it's notebook size, connection slot and bus, if the video card is inserted into a slot instead of being soldered to the notebook motherboard.

Laptop sizeno datalarge
Bus supportno dataPCI Express 3.0
InterfacePCIe 4.0 x8MXM-B (3.0)
WidthIGPno data
Supplementary power connectorsNoneNone
SLI optionsno data+

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR6GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount2 GB6 GB
Memory bus width64 Bit192 Bit
Memory clock speed12 GB/s2500 MHz
Memory bandwidth96 GB/s120 GB/s
Shared memoryno data-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsNo outputs
VGA аnalog display supportno data+
DisplayPort Multimode (DP++) supportno data+
HDMIno data+
G-SYNC supportno data+

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

GameStreamno data+
GeForce ShadowPlayno data+
GPU Boostno data2.0
GameWorksno data+
H.264, VC1, MPEG2 1080p video decoderno data+
Optimusno data+
BatteryBoostno data+
Anselno data+

API compatibility

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 Ultimate (12_2)12 (12_1)
Shader Model6.66.4
OpenGL4.64.5
OpenCL3.01.1
Vulkan1.31.1.126
CUDA8.6+

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark performance comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

MX570 A 15.43
+3.8%
GTX 970M 14.86

MX570 A outperforms GTX 970M by 4% based on our aggregate benchmark results.


Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark, part of Passmark PerformanceTest suite. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Benchmark coverage: 25%

MX570 A 5957
+3.8%
GTX 970M 5739

MX570 A outperforms GTX 970M by 4% in Passmark.

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

900p140−150
+2.9%
136
−2.9%
Full HD60−65
+1.7%
59
−1.7%
1440p24−27
−4.2%
25
+4.2%
4K21−24
−4.8%
22
+4.8%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 21−24
+9.5%
21−24
−9.5%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 42
+5%
40−45
−5%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 24−27
+14.3%
21−24
−14.3%
Battlefield 5 52
+4%
50−55
−4%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 30−33
+11.1%
27−30
−11.1%
Cyberpunk 2077 21−24
+9.5%
21−24
−9.5%
Far Cry 5 50
+11.1%
45−50
−11.1%
Far Cry New Dawn 48
+6.7%
45−50
−6.7%
Forza Horizon 4 61
+10.9%
55−60
−10.9%
Hitman 3 27−30
+7.4%
27−30
−7.4%
Horizon Zero Dawn 60−65
+9.1%
55−60
−9.1%
Metro Exodus 53
+6%
50−55
−6%
Red Dead Redemption 2 40−45
+17.1%
35−40
−17.1%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 45−50
+4.4%
45−50
−4.4%
Watch Dogs: Legion 45−50
+6.7%
45−50
−6.7%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 36
+20%
30−33
−20%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 24−27
+14.3%
21−24
−14.3%
Battlefield 5 44
+10%
40−45
−10%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 30−33
+11.1%
27−30
−11.1%
Cyberpunk 2077 21−24
+9.5%
21−24
−9.5%
Far Cry 5 41
+17.1%
35−40
−17.1%
Far Cry New Dawn 37
+5.7%
35−40
−5.7%
Forza Horizon 4 131
+9.2%
120−130
−9.2%
Hitman 3 27−30
+7.4%
27−30
−7.4%
Horizon Zero Dawn 60−65
+9.1%
55−60
−9.1%
Metro Exodus 40
+14.3%
35−40
−14.3%
Red Dead Redemption 2 40−45
+17.1%
35−40
−17.1%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 45−50
+4.4%
45−50
−4.4%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 45
+12.5%
40−45
−12.5%
Watch Dogs: Legion 45−50
+6.7%
45−50
−6.7%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 21
+16.7%
18−20
−16.7%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 24−27
+14.3%
21−24
−14.3%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 30−33
+11.1%
27−30
−11.1%
Cyberpunk 2077 21−24
+9.5%
21−24
−9.5%
Far Cry 5 29
+7.4%
27−30
−7.4%
Forza Horizon 4 36
+20%
30−33
−20%
Horizon Zero Dawn 60−65
+9.1%
55−60
−9.1%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 45−50
+4.4%
45−50
−4.4%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 26
+8.3%
24−27
−8.3%
Watch Dogs: Legion 45−50
+6.7%
45−50
−6.7%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 40−45
+17.1%
35−40
−17.1%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5 26
+8.3%
24−27
−8.3%
Far Cry New Dawn 28
+16.7%
24−27
−16.7%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 17
+6.3%
16−18
−6.3%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 12−14
+20%
10−11
−20%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 18−20
+12.5%
16−18
−12.5%
Cyberpunk 2077 8−9
+14.3%
7−8
−14.3%
Far Cry 5 27
+12.5%
24−27
−12.5%
Forza Horizon 4 23
+9.5%
21−24
−9.5%
Hitman 3 18−20
+12.5%
16−18
−12.5%
Horizon Zero Dawn 30−33
+11.1%
27−30
−11.1%
Metro Exodus 25
+4.2%
24−27
−4.2%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 27−30
+12.5%
24−27
−12.5%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 16−18
+14.3%
14−16
−14.3%
Watch Dogs: Legion 9−10
+12.5%
8−9
−12.5%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 24−27
+14.3%
21−24
−14.3%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5 12
+20%
10−11
−20%
Far Cry New Dawn 13
+8.3%
12−14
−8.3%
Hitman 3 10−12
+10%
10−11
−10%
Horizon Zero Dawn 16−18
+14.3%
14−16
−14.3%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 9
+12.5%
8−9
−12.5%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 16
+14.3%
14−16
−14.3%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 8−9
+14.3%
7−8
−14.3%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 7−8
+16.7%
6−7
−16.7%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 7−8
+16.7%
6−7
−16.7%
Cyberpunk 2077 2−3
+100%
1−2
−100%
Far Cry 5 8
+14.3%
7−8
−14.3%
Forza Horizon 4 6
+20%
5−6
−20%
Horizon Zero Dawn 16−18
+14.3%
14−16
−14.3%
Metro Exodus 12
+20%
10−11
−20%
Watch Dogs: Legion 6−7
+20%
5−6
−20%

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 12−14
+8.3%
12−14
−8.3%

This is how MX570 A and GTX 970M compete in popular games:

  • MX570 A is 3% faster in 900p
  • MX570 A is 2% faster in 1080p
  • GTX 970M is 4% faster in 1440p
  • GTX 970M is 5% faster in 4K

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 15.43 14.86
Maximum RAM amount 2 GB 6 GB
Chip lithography 8 nm 28 nm

Given the minimal performance differences, no clear winner can be declared between GeForce MX570 A and GeForce GTX 970M.

Be aware that GeForce MX570 A is a desktop card while GeForce GTX 970M is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce MX570 A
GeForce MX570 A
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 970M
GeForce GTX 970M

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4.4 12 votes

Rate GeForce MX570 A on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.2 293 votes

Rate GeForce GTX 970M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.