GeForce GTX 960 vs MX570 A

Aggregate performance score

We've compared GeForce MX570 A and GeForce GTX 960, covering specs and all relevant benchmarks.

MX570 A
2022
2 GB GDDR6, 25 Watt
15.42

GTX 960 outperforms MX570 A by a minimal 2% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in performance ranking323318
Place by popularitynot in top-10053
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data2.21
ArchitectureAmpere (2020−2022)Maxwell (2014−2018)
GPU code nameGA107GM206
Market segmentDesktopDesktop
Release dateMay 2022 (2 years ago)22 January 2015 (9 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$199
Current price$1574 $440 (2.2x MSRP)

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores20481024
CUDA coresno data1024
Core clock speedno data1127 MHz
Boost clock speed1155 MHz1178 MHz
Number of transistorsno data2,940 million
Manufacturing process technology8 nm28 nm
Power consumption (TDP)25 Watt120 Watt
Texture fill rate73.9272 billion/sec
Floating-point performanceno data2,413 gflops

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Bus supportno dataPCI Express 3.0
InterfacePCIe 4.0 x8PCIe 3.0 x16
Lengthno data9.5" (24.1 cm)
Heightno data4.376" (11.1 cm)
WidthIGP2-slot
Recommended system power (PSU)no data400 Watt
Supplementary power connectorsNone1x 6-pins
SLI optionsno data+

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR6GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount2 GB4 GB
Memory bus width64 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed12 GB/s7.0 GB/s
Memory bandwidth96 GB/s112 GB/s
Shared memoryno data-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsDual Link DVI-I, HDMI 2.0, 3x DisplayPort 1.2
Multi monitor supportno data4 displays
HDMIno data+
HDCPno data+
Maximum VGA resolutionno data2048x1536
G-SYNC supportno data+
Audio input for HDMIno dataInternal

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

GameStreamno data+
GeForce ShadowPlayno data+
GPU Boostno data2.0
GameWorksno data+

API compatibility

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 Ultimate (12_2)12 (12_1)
Shader Model6.66.4
OpenGL4.64.4
OpenCL3.01.2
Vulkan1.3+
CUDA8.6+

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark performance comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

MX570 A 15.42
GTX 960 15.72
+1.9%

GTX 960 outperforms MX570 A by 2% based on our aggregate benchmark results.


Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark, part of Passmark PerformanceTest suite. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Benchmark coverage: 25%

MX570 A 5957
GTX 960 6072
+1.9%

GTX 960 outperforms MX570 A by 2% in Passmark.

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD60−65
−8.3%
65
+8.3%
4K27−30
−11.1%
30
+11.1%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 24−27
+4.2%
24−27
−4.2%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 30−35
+6.7%
30−33
−6.7%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 24−27
+8.3%
24−27
−8.3%
Battlefield 5 50−55
+2%
50−55
−2%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 30−35
+6.7%
30−33
−6.7%
Cyberpunk 2077 24−27
+4.2%
24−27
−4.2%
Far Cry 5 35−40
+5.7%
35−40
−5.7%
Far Cry New Dawn 40−45
+7.5%
40−45
−7.5%
Forza Horizon 4 70−75
−1.4%
75−80
+1.4%
Hitman 3 30−33
+0%
30−33
+0%
Horizon Zero Dawn 60−65
+5%
60−65
−5%
Metro Exodus 50−55
+4%
50−55
−4%
Red Dead Redemption 2 40−45
+10%
40−45
−10%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 50−55
+0%
50−55
+0%
Watch Dogs: Legion 50−55
+0%
50−55
+0%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 30−35
+6.7%
30−33
−6.7%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 24−27
+8.3%
24−27
−8.3%
Battlefield 5 50−55
+2%
50−55
−2%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 30−35
+6.7%
30−33
−6.7%
Cyberpunk 2077 24−27
+4.2%
24−27
−4.2%
Far Cry 5 35−40
+5.7%
35−40
−5.7%
Far Cry New Dawn 40−45
+7.5%
40−45
−7.5%
Forza Horizon 4 70−75
−1.4%
75−80
+1.4%
Hitman 3 30−33
+0%
30−33
+0%
Horizon Zero Dawn 60−65
+5%
60−65
−5%
Metro Exodus 50−55
+4%
50−55
−4%
Red Dead Redemption 2 40−45
+10%
40−45
−10%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 50−55
+0%
50−55
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 50
+0%
50−55
+0%
Watch Dogs: Legion 50−55
+0%
50−55
+0%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 30−35
+6.7%
30−33
−6.7%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 24−27
+8.3%
24−27
−8.3%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 30−35
+6.7%
30−33
−6.7%
Cyberpunk 2077 24−27
+4.2%
24−27
−4.2%
Far Cry 5 35−40
+5.7%
35−40
−5.7%
Forza Horizon 4 70−75
−1.4%
75−80
+1.4%
Horizon Zero Dawn 60−65
+5%
60−65
−5%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 50−55
+0%
50−55
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 28
+3.7%
27−30
−3.7%
Watch Dogs: Legion 50−55
+0%
50−55
+0%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 40−45
+10%
40−45
−10%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5 30−33
+0%
30−33
+0%
Far Cry New Dawn 27−30
+7.4%
27−30
−7.4%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 16−18
+0%
16−18
+0%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 12−14
+8.3%
12−14
−8.3%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 18−20
+5.6%
18−20
−5.6%
Cyberpunk 2077 8−9
+0%
8−9
+0%
Far Cry 5 24−27
+8.3%
24−27
−8.3%
Forza Horizon 4 30−33
+0%
30−33
+0%
Hitman 3 18−20
+5.6%
18−20
−5.6%
Horizon Zero Dawn 30−35
+6.7%
30−33
−6.7%
Metro Exodus 27−30
+3.7%
27−30
−3.7%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 27−30
+7.4%
27−30
−7.4%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 16−18
+6.3%
16−18
−6.3%
Watch Dogs: Legion 10−11
+0%
10−11
+0%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 24−27
+8.3%
24−27
−8.3%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5 14−16
+7.1%
14−16
−7.1%
Far Cry New Dawn 12−14
+0%
12−14
+0%
Hitman 3 10−12
+10%
10−11
−10%
Horizon Zero Dawn 16−18
+6.3%
16−18
−6.3%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 10−11
+0%
10−11
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 14−16
+7.1%
14−16
−7.1%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 9−10
+0%
9−10
+0%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 8−9
+0%
8−9
+0%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 8−9
+0%
8−9
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 3−4
+0%
3−4
+0%
Far Cry 5 8−9
+0%
8−9
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 21−24
+0%
21−24
+0%
Horizon Zero Dawn 16−18
+6.3%
16−18
−6.3%
Metro Exodus 14−16
+7.1%
14−16
−7.1%
Watch Dogs: Legion 6−7
+0%
6−7
+0%

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 14−16
+0%
14−16
+0%

This is how MX570 A and GTX 960 compete in popular games:

  • GTX 960 is 8% faster in 1080p
  • GTX 960 is 11% faster in 4K

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 15.42 15.72
Maximum RAM amount 2 GB 4 GB
Chip lithography 8 nm 28 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 25 Watt 120 Watt

Given the minimal performance differences, no clear winner can be declared between GeForce MX570 A and GeForce GTX 960.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce MX570 A
GeForce MX570 A
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 960
GeForce GTX 960

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4.4 12 votes

Rate GeForce MX570 A on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4 3446 votes

Rate GeForce GTX 960 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.