GeForce GTX 780 Rev. 2 vs MX570 A
Aggregate performance score
We've compared GeForce MX570 A with GeForce GTX 780 Rev. 2, including specs and performance data.
MX570 A outperforms 780 Rev. 2 by an impressive 52% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Contents
Primary details
GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.
| Place in the ranking | 389 | 485 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Cost-effectiveness evaluation | no data | 1.04 |
| Power efficiency | 45.25 | 2.99 |
| Architecture | Ampere (2020−2025) | Kepler (2012−2018) |
| GPU code name | GA107 | GK110B |
| Market segment | Laptop | Desktop |
| Release date | May 2022 (3 years ago) | 10 September 2013 (12 years ago) |
| Launch price (MSRP) | no data | $649 |
Cost-effectiveness evaluation
The higher the ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices.
Performance to price scatter graph
Detailed specifications
General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.
| Pipelines / CUDA cores | 2048 | 2304 |
| Core clock speed | 832 MHz | 863 MHz |
| Boost clock speed | 1155 MHz | 902 MHz |
| Number of transistors | no data | 7,080 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 8 nm | 28 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 25 Watt | 250 Watt |
| Texture fill rate | 73.92 | 173.2 |
| Floating-point processing power | 4.731 TFLOPS | 4.156 TFLOPS |
| ROPs | 40 | 48 |
| TMUs | 64 | 192 |
| Tensor Cores | 64 | no data |
| Ray Tracing Cores | 16 | no data |
| L1 Cache | 2 MB | 192 KB |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB | 1536 KB |
Form factor & compatibility
Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).
| Interface | PCIe 4.0 x8 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Length | no data | 267 mm |
| Width | no data | 2-slot |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | 1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin |
VRAM capacity and type
Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.
| Memory type | GDDR6 | GDDR5 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 3 GB |
| Memory bus width | 64 Bit | 384 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 1500 MHz | 1502 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 96 GB/s | 288.4 GB/s |
| Resizable BAR | + | - |
Connectivity and outputs
This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.
| Display Connectors | No outputs | 2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort |
| HDMI | - | + |
API and SDK support
List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.
| DirectX | 12 Ultimate (12_2) | 12 (11_1) |
| Shader Model | 6.6 | 5.1 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| OpenCL | 3.0 | 1.2 |
| Vulkan | 1.3 | 1.1.126 |
| CUDA | 8.6 | 3.5 |
| DLSS | + | - |
Gaming performance
Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.
Pros & cons summary
| Performance score | 13.99 | 9.23 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 3 GB |
| Chip lithography | 8 nm | 28 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 25 Watt | 250 Watt |
MX570 A has a 51.6% higher aggregate performance score, a 250% more advanced lithography process, and 900% lower power consumption.
GTX 780 Rev. 2, on the other hand, has a 50% higher maximum VRAM amount.
The GeForce MX570 A is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce GTX 780 Rev. 2 in performance tests.
Be aware that GeForce MX570 A is a notebook graphics card while GeForce GTX 780 Rev. 2 is a desktop one.
Other comparisons
We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.
