FirePro D500 vs GeForce MX570 A
Aggregate performance score
We've compared GeForce MX570 A with FirePro D500, including specs and performance data.
MX570 A outperforms D500 by a considerable 49% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Contents
Primary details
GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.
| Place in the ranking | 389 | 485 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Power efficiency | 45.20 | 2.76 |
| Architecture | Ampere (2020−2025) | GCN 1.0 (2012−2020) |
| GPU code name | GA107 | Tahiti |
| Market segment | Laptop | Workstation |
| Release date | May 2022 (3 years ago) | 18 January 2014 (11 years ago) |
Detailed specifications
General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.
| Pipelines / CUDA cores | 2048 | 1536 |
| Core clock speed | 832 MHz | 725 MHz |
| Boost clock speed | 1155 MHz | no data |
| Number of transistors | no data | 4,313 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 8 nm | 28 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 25 Watt | 274 Watt |
| Texture fill rate | 73.92 | 69.60 |
| Floating-point processing power | 4.731 TFLOPS | 2.227 TFLOPS |
| ROPs | 40 | 32 |
| TMUs | 64 | 96 |
| Tensor Cores | 64 | no data |
| Ray Tracing Cores | 16 | no data |
| L1 Cache | 2 MB | 384 KB |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB | 768 KB |
Form factor & compatibility
Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).
| Interface | PCIe 4.0 x8 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Length | no data | 279 mm |
| Width | no data | 2-slot |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | no data |
VRAM capacity and type
Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.
| Memory type | GDDR6 | GDDR5 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 3 GB |
| Memory bus width | 64 Bit | 384 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 1500 MHz | 1270 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 96 GB/s | 243.8 GB/s |
| Resizable BAR | + | - |
Connectivity and outputs
This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.
| Display Connectors | No outputs | 6x mini-DisplayPort, 1x SDI |
API and SDK support
List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.
| DirectX | 12 Ultimate (12_2) | 12 (11_1) |
| Shader Model | 6.6 | 5.1 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| OpenCL | 3.0 | 1.2 |
| Vulkan | 1.3 | 1.2.131 |
| CUDA | 8.6 | - |
| DLSS | + | - |
Gaming performance
Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.
Pros & cons summary
| Performance score | 13.96 | 9.34 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 3 GB |
| Chip lithography | 8 nm | 28 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 25 Watt | 274 Watt |
MX570 A has a 49.5% higher aggregate performance score, a 250% more advanced lithography process, and 996% lower power consumption.
FirePro D500, on the other hand, has a 50% higher maximum VRAM amount.
The GeForce MX570 A is our recommended choice as it beats the FirePro D500 in performance tests.
Be aware that GeForce MX570 A is a notebook graphics card while FirePro D500 is a workstation one.
Other comparisons
We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.
