UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake 16 EU) vs GeForce MX450

Place in the ranking	458	1007
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Power efficiency	27.02	9.69
Architecture	Turing (2018−2022)	Gen. 11 (2021)
GPU code name	N17S-G5 / GP107-670-A1	Gen. 11
Market segment	Laptop	Laptop
Release date	1 August 2020 (4 years ago)	11 January 2021 (3 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	896	24
Core clock speed	1395 MHz	350 MHz
Boost clock speed	1575 MHz	800 MHz
Number of transistors	4,700 million	no data
Manufacturing process technology	12 nm	10 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	25 Watt (12 - 29 Watt TGP)	4.8 - 10 Watt
Texture fill rate	100.8	no data
Floating-point processing power	3.226 TFLOPS	no data
ROPs	32	no data
TMUs	64	no data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Interface	PCIe 4.0 x4	no data
Supplementary power connectors	None	no data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	GDDR5, GDDR6	no data
Maximum RAM amount	2 GB	no data
Memory bus width	64 Bit	no data
Memory clock speed	10000 MHz	no data
Memory bandwidth	64.03 GB/s	no data
Shared memory	-	+

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors

No outputs

no data

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Optimus	+	-
Quick Sync	no data	+

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	12 (12_1)	12_1
Shader Model	6.5	no data
OpenGL	4.6	no data
OpenCL	1.2	no data
Vulkan	1.2	-
CUDA	7.5	-

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

GeForce MX450 9.69
+597%

UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake 16 EU) 1.39

3DMark 11 Performance GPU

3DMark 11 is an obsolete DirectX 11 benchmark by Futuremark. It used four tests based on two scenes, one being few submarines exploring the submerged wreck of a sunken ship, the other is an abandoned temple deep in the jungle. All the tests are heavy with volumetric lighting and tessellation, and despite being done in 1280x720 resolution, are relatively taxing. Discontinued in January 2020, 3DMark 11 is now superseded by Time Spy.

GeForce MX450 8250
+866%

UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake 16 EU) 854

3DMark Vantage Performance

3DMark Vantage is an outdated DirectX 10 benchmark using 1280x1024 screen resolution. It taxes the graphics card with two scenes, one depicting a girl escaping some militarized base located within a sea cave, the other displaying a space fleet attack on a defenseless planet. It was discontinued in April 2017, and Time Spy benchmark is now recommended to be used instead.

GeForce MX450 22831
+569%

UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake 16 EU) 3411

3DMark Fire Strike Graphics

Fire Strike is a DirectX 11 benchmark for gaming PCs. It features two separate tests displaying a fight between a humanoid and a fiery creature made of lava. Using 1920x1080 resolution, Fire Strike shows off some realistic graphics and is quite taxing on hardware.

GeForce MX450 4725
+633%

UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake 16 EU) 645

3DMark Cloud Gate GPU

Cloud Gate is an outdated DirectX 11 feature level 10 benchmark that was used for home PCs and basic notebooks. It displays a few scenes of some weird space teleportation device launching spaceships into unknown, using fixed resolution of 1280x720. Just like Ice Storm benchmark, it has been discontinued in January 2020 and replaced by 3DMark Night Raid.

GeForce MX450 27570
+461%

UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake 16 EU) 4911

3DMark Ice Storm GPU

Ice Storm Graphics is an obsolete benchmark, part of 3DMark suite. Ice Storm was used to measure entry level laptops and Windows-based tablets performance. It utilizes DirectX 11 feature level 9 to display a battle between two space fleets near a frozen planet in 1280x720 resolution. Discontinued in January 2020, it is now superseded by 3DMark Night Raid.

GeForce MX450 335125
+668%

UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake 16 EU) 43610

3DMark Time Spy Graphics

GeForce MX450 1900
+967%

UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake 16 EU) 178

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD	28 +250%	8 −250%
1440p	19 +850%	2−3 −850%
4K	28 +600%	4−5 −600%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077

32
+700%

4−5

−700%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	21−24 +283%	6−7 −283%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	10 +900%	1−2 −900%
Battlefield 5	30−33 +650%	4−5 −650%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	20−22 +400%	4−5 −400%
Cyberpunk 2077	22 +450%	4−5 −450%
Far Cry 5	21−24 +2100%	1−2 −2100%
Far Cry New Dawn	27−30 +800%	3−4 −800%
Forza Horizon 4	60−65 +2033%	3−4 −2033%
Hitman 3	30 +400%	6−7 −400%
Horizon Zero Dawn	50−55 +279%	14−16 −279%
Metro Exodus	55 +686%	7−8 −686%
Red Dead Redemption 2	45 +2150%	2−3 −2150%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	30−35 +300%	8−9 −300%
Watch Dogs: Legion	94 +185%	30−35 −185%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	21−24 +283%	6−7 −283%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	6	0−1
Battlefield 5	30−33 +650%	4−5 −650%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	20−22 +400%	4−5 −400%
Cyberpunk 2077	13 +225%	4−5 −225%
Far Cry 5	21−24 +2100%	1−2 −2100%
Far Cry New Dawn	27−30 +800%	3−4 −800%
Forza Horizon 4	60−65 +2033%	3−4 −2033%
Hitman 3	29 +383%	6−7 −383%
Horizon Zero Dawn	50−55 +279%	14−16 −279%
Metro Exodus	37 +640%	5−6 −640%
Red Dead Redemption 2	27−30 +1250%	2−3 −1250%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	40 +567%	6 −567%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	24−27 +136%	10−12 −136%
Watch Dogs: Legion	89 +170%	30−35 −170%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	21−24 +283%	6−7 −283%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	11 +1000%	1−2 −1000%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	20−22 +400%	4−5 −400%
Cyberpunk 2077	8 +100%	4−5 −100%
Far Cry 5	21−24 +2100%	1−2 −2100%
Forza Horizon 4	60−65 +2033%	3−4 −2033%
Hitman 3	25 +317%	6−7 −317%
Horizon Zero Dawn	24 +71.4%	14−16 −71.4%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	30 +275%	8−9 −275%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	20 +81.8%	10−12 −81.8%
Watch Dogs: Legion	7 −371%	30−35 +371%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

31
+1450%

2−3

−1450%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5	18−20 +1800%	1−2 −1800%
Far Cry New Dawn	14−16 +650%	2−3 −650%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	9−10 +800%	1−2 −800%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	7 +600%	1−2 −600%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	10−11	0−1
Cyberpunk 2077	5−6 +400%	1−2 −400%
Far Cry 5	10−12 +1000%	1−2 −1000%
Forza Horizon 4	40−45 +600%	6−7 −600%
Hitman 3	18 +157%	7−8 −157%
Horizon Zero Dawn	20−22 +300%	5−6 −300%
Metro Exodus	14−16 +600%	2−3 −600%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	18 +800%	2−3 −800%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	9−10 +800%	1−2 −800%
Watch Dogs: Legion	60−65 +917%	6−7 −917%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

26
+550%

4−5

−550%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5	9−10 +800%	1−2 −800%
Far Cry New Dawn	7−8	0−1
Hitman 3	6−7	0−1
Horizon Zero Dawn	40−45 +720%	5−6 −720%
Metro Exodus	8−9 +700%	1−2 −700%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	7−8 +600%	1−2 −600%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	6−7 +500%	1−2 −500%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	4−5 +300%	1−2 −300%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	4−5	0−1
Cyberpunk 2077	1−2	0−1
Far Cry 5	5−6	0−1
Forza Horizon 4	12−14 +1100%	1−2 −1100%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	6−7	0−1
Watch Dogs: Legion	3−4	0−1

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

9−10
+200%

3−4

−200%

This is how GeForce MX450 and UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake 16 EU) compete in popular games:

GeForce MX450 is 250% faster in 1080p
GeForce MX450 is 850% faster in 1440p
GeForce MX450 is 600% faster in 4K

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

in Red Dead Redemption 2, with 1080p resolution and the Medium Preset, the GeForce MX450 is 2150% faster.
in Watch Dogs: Legion, with 1080p resolution and the Ultra Preset, the UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake 16 EU) is 371% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

GeForce MX450 is ahead in 47 tests (98%)
UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake 16 EU) is ahead in 1 test (2%)

Pros & cons summary

Performance score	9.69	1.39
Recency	1 August 2020	11 January 2021
Chip lithography	12 nm	10 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	25 Watt	4 Watt

GeForce MX450 has a 597.1% higher aggregate performance score.

UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake 16 EU), on the other hand, has an age advantage of 5 months, a 20% more advanced lithography process, and 525% lower power consumption.

The GeForce MX450 is our recommended choice as it beats the UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake 16 EU) in performance tests.

Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.