Iris Plus Graphics 940 vs GeForce MX450

VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking454not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency26.81no data
ArchitectureTuring (2018−2022)Generation 11.0 (2019−2021)
GPU code nameN17S-G5 / GP107-670-A1Ice Lake GT2
Market segmentLaptopDesktop
Release date1 August 2020 (4 years ago)no data (2024 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores896384
Core clock speed1395 MHz400 MHz
Boost clock speed1575 MHz1000 MHz
Number of transistors4,700 millionno data
Manufacturing process technology12 nm10 nm
Power consumption (TDP)25 Watt (12 - 29 Watt TGP)15 Watt
Texture fill rate100.824.00
Floating-point processing power3.226 TFLOPS0.768 TFLOPS
ROPs328
TMUs6424

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 4.0 x4PCIe 3.0 x1
Widthno dataIGP
Supplementary power connectorsNoneno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5, GDDR6System Shared
Maximum RAM amount2 GBSystem Shared
Memory bus width64 BitSystem Shared
Memory clock speed10000 MHzSystem Shared
Memory bandwidth64.03 GB/sno data
Shared memory-no data

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsNo outputs

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Optimus+-

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)12 (12_1)
Shader Model6.5no data
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL1.2no data
Vulkan1.2-
CUDA7.5-

Pros & cons summary


Chip lithography 12 nm 10 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 25 Watt 15 Watt

Iris Plus Graphics 940 has a 20% more advanced lithography process, and 66.7% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between GeForce MX450 and Iris Plus Graphics 940. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that GeForce MX450 is a notebook card while Iris Plus Graphics 940 is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce MX450
GeForce MX450
Intel Iris Plus Graphics 940
Iris Plus Graphics 940

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.6 1298 votes

Rate GeForce MX450 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.6 82 votes

Rate Iris Plus Graphics 940 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.