RTX A1000 Mobile vs GeForce MX450 30.5W 8Gbps

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot rated221
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
ArchitectureTuring (2018−2022)Ampere (2020−2024)
GPU code nameTU117GA107
Market segmentDesktopLaptop
Release date25 August 2020 (4 years ago)30 March 2022 (2 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores8962048
Boost clock speed1275 MHzno data
Number of transistors4,700 millionno data
Manufacturing process technology12 nm8 nm
Power consumption (TDP)31 Watt95 Watt (35 - 95 Watt TGP)
Texture fill rate71.4072.96
Floating-point processing power2.285 gflops4.669 gflops
ROPs3232
TMUs5664

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizeno datamedium sized
InterfacePCIe 4.0 x4PCIe 4.0 x8
Supplementary power connectorsNoneno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount2 GB4 GB
Memory bus width64 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed8 GB/s14000 MHz
Memory bandwidth64 GB/s176.0 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsPortable Device Dependent

API compatibility

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model6.56.7
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL1.23.0
Vulkan1.21.3
CUDA7.58.6

Pros & cons summary


Recency 25 August 2020 30 March 2022
Maximum RAM amount 2 GB 4 GB
Chip lithography 12 nm 8 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 31 Watt 95 Watt

MX450 30.5W 8Gbps has 206.5% lower power consumption.

RTX A1000 Mobile, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 1 year, a 100% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 50% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between GeForce MX450 30.5W 8Gbps and RTX A1000 Mobile. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that GeForce MX450 30.5W 8Gbps is a desktop card while RTX A1000 Mobile is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce MX450 30.5W 8Gbps
GeForce MX450 30.5W 8Gbps
NVIDIA RTX A1000 Mobile
RTX A1000 Mobile

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4.4 10 votes

Rate GeForce MX450 30.5W 8Gbps on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.2 84 votes

Rate RTX A1000 Mobile on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.