RTX A2000 Embedded vs GeForce MX450 25W

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot rated243
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiencyno data58.39
ArchitectureTuring (2018−2022)Ampere (2020−2025)
GPU code nameTU117GA107S
Market segmentLaptopMobile workstation
Release date15 August 2020 (5 years ago)30 March 2022 (3 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores8962560
Core clock speed720 MHz607 MHz
Boost clock speed930 MHz1177 MHz
Number of transistors4,700 millionno data
Manufacturing process technology12 nm8 nm
Power consumption (TDP)25 Watt35 Watt
Texture fill rate52.0894.16
Floating-point processing power1.667 TFLOPS6.026 TFLOPS
ROPs3232
TMUs5680
Tensor Coresno data80
Ray Tracing Coresno data20
L1 Cache896 KB2.5 MB
L2 Cache512 KB2 MB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 4.0 x4PCIe 4.0 x8
Supplementary power connectorsNoneNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR6GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount2 GB4 GB
Memory bus width64 Bit64 Bit
Memory clock speed1250 MHz1500 MHz
Memory bandwidth80 GB/s96 GB/s
Resizable BAR-+

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsPortable Device Dependent

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model6.56.7
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL1.23.0
Vulkan1.21.3
CUDA7.58.6
DLSS-+

Pros & cons summary


Recency 15 August 2020 30 March 2022
Maximum RAM amount 2 GB 4 GB
Chip lithography 12 nm 8 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 25 Watt 35 Watt

MX450 25W has 40% lower power consumption.

RTX A2000 Embedded, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 1 year, a 100% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 50% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between GeForce MX450 25W and RTX A2000 Embedded. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that GeForce MX450 25W is a notebook graphics card while RTX A2000 Embedded is a mobile workstation one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce MX450 25W
GeForce MX450 25W
NVIDIA RTX A2000 Embedded
RTX A2000 Embedded

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.9 29 votes

Rate GeForce MX450 25W on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.7 3 votes

Rate RTX A2000 Embedded on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about GeForce MX450 25W or RTX A2000 Embedded, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.