Matrox Millenium P650 vs GeForce MX450 25W

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot ratednot rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
ArchitectureTuring (2018−2022)Parhelia (2002−2006)
GPU code nameTU117Parhelia-LX
Market segmentLaptopDesktop
Release date15 August 2020 (5 years ago)2 January 2002 (24 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores896no data
Core clock speed720 MHz190 MHz
Boost clock speed930 MHzno data
Number of transistors4,700 million80 million
Manufacturing process technology12 nm150 nm
Power consumption (TDP)25 Wattno data
Texture fill rate52.080.76
Floating-point processing power1.667 TFLOPSno data
ROPs322
TMUs564
L1 Cache896 KBno data
L2 Cache512 KBno data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 4.0 x4AGP 8x
Widthno data1-slot
Supplementary power connectorsNoneNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR6DDR
Maximum RAM amount2 GB128 MB
Memory bus width64 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed1250 MHz230 MHz
Memory bandwidth80 GB/s7.36 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputs2x DVI

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)8.1
Shader Model6.5no data
OpenGL4.61.3
OpenCL1.2N/A
Vulkan1.2N/A
CUDA7.5-

Pros & cons summary


Recency 15 August 2020 2 January 2002
Maximum RAM amount 2 GB 128 MB
Chip lithography 12 nm 150 nm

MX450 25W has an age advantage of 18 years, a 1500% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 1150% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between GeForce MX450 25W and Matrox Millenium P650. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that GeForce MX450 25W is a notebook graphics card while Matrox Millenium P650 is a desktop one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce MX450 25W
GeForce MX450 25W
Matrox Millenium P650
Millenium P650

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.9 29 votes

Rate GeForce MX450 25W on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
5 1 vote

Rate Matrox Millenium P650 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about GeForce MX450 25W or Matrox Millenium P650, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.