NVS 3100M vs GeForce MX350

VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared GeForce MX350 with NVS 3100M, including specs and performance data.

GeForce MX350
2020
2 GB GDDR5, 20 Watt
6.28
+1265%

MX350 outperforms NVS 3100M by a whopping 1265% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking5511240
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency24.802.60
ArchitecturePascal (2016−2021)Tesla 2.0 (2007−2013)
GPU code nameGP107GT218
Market segmentLaptopMobile workstation
Release date10 February 2020 (5 years ago)7 January 2010 (15 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores64016
Core clock speed747 MHz606 MHz
Boost clock speed937 MHzno data
Number of transistors3,300 million260 million
Manufacturing process technology14 nm40 nm
Power consumption (TDP)20 Watt14 Watt
Texture fill rate29.984.848
Floating-point processing power1.199 TFLOPS0.04698 TFLOPS
ROPs164
TMUs328

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCIe 2.0 x16
Supplementary power connectorsNoneno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR3
Maximum RAM amount2 GB512 MB
Memory bus width64 Bit64 Bit
Memory clock speed1752 MHz790 MHz
Memory bandwidth56.06 GB/s12.64 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsNo outputs

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Optimus+-

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)11.1 (10_1)
Shader Model6.44.1
OpenGL4.63.3
OpenCL1.21.1
Vulkan1.2.131N/A
CUDA6.11.2

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score.

GeForce MX350 6.28
+1265%
NVS 3100M 0.46

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

GeForce MX350 2805
+1275%
NVS 3100M 204

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD26
+2500%
1−2
−2500%
1440p27
+2600%
1−2
−2600%
4K26
+2500%
1−2
−2500%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Atomic Heart 31
+1450%
2−3
−1450%
Counter-Strike 2 66
+1550%
4−5
−1550%
Cyberpunk 2077 16
+700%
2−3
−700%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Atomic Heart 24
+1100%
2−3
−1100%
Battlefield 5 37
+1750%
2−3
−1750%
Counter-Strike 2 50
+1567%
3−4
−1567%
Cyberpunk 2077 11
+450%
2−3
−450%
Far Cry 5 27
+2600%
1−2
−2600%
Fortnite 82
+1267%
6−7
−1267%
Forza Horizon 4 37
+825%
4−5
−825%
Forza Horizon 5 25
+2400%
1−2
−2400%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 24−27
+257%
7−8
−257%
Valorant 129
+361%
27−30
−361%

Full HD
High Preset

Atomic Heart 7
+250%
2−3
−250%
Battlefield 5 30
+1400%
2−3
−1400%
Counter-Strike 2 24
+2300%
1−2
−2300%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 120
+650%
16−18
−650%
Cyberpunk 2077 6
+200%
2−3
−200%
Dota 2 83
+655%
10−12
−655%
Far Cry 5 23
+2200%
1−2
−2200%
Fortnite 43
+1333%
3−4
−1333%
Forza Horizon 4 26
+550%
4−5
−550%
Forza Horizon 5 16
+1500%
1−2
−1500%
Grand Theft Auto V 35
+1650%
2−3
−1650%
Metro Exodus 12 0−1
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 24−27
+257%
7−8
−257%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 27
+575%
4−5
−575%
Valorant 116
+314%
27−30
−314%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 24
+2300%
1−2
−2300%
Cyberpunk 2077 5
+150%
2−3
−150%
Dota 2 76
+591%
10−12
−591%
Far Cry 5 21
+2000%
1−2
−2000%
Forza Horizon 4 19
+375%
4−5
−375%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 24−27
+257%
7−8
−257%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 16
+300%
4−5
−300%
Valorant 70−75
+164%
27−30
−164%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Fortnite 27
+2600%
1−2
−2600%

1440p
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 10−12 0−1
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 50−55
+5100%
1−2
−5100%
Grand Theft Auto V 9−10 0−1
Metro Exodus 7−8 0−1
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 35−40
+680%
5−6
−680%
Valorant 75−80
+1440%
5−6
−1440%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 12−14 0−1
Cyberpunk 2077 5−6 0−1
Far Cry 5 14−16
+1300%
1−2
−1300%
Forza Horizon 4 16−18
+1500%
1−2
−1500%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 10−11 0−1

1440p
Epic Preset

Fortnite 14−16
+1300%
1−2
−1300%

4K
High Preset

Atomic Heart 5−6 0−1
Grand Theft Auto V 18−20
+20%
14−16
−20%
Metro Exodus 2−3 0−1
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 4−5 0−1
Valorant 35−40
+1067%
3−4
−1067%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 6−7 0−1
Cyberpunk 2077 2−3 0−1
Dota 2 30
+1400%
2−3
−1400%
Far Cry 5 7−8
+600%
1−2
−600%
Forza Horizon 4 10−12 0−1
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 7−8
+250%
2−3
−250%

4K
Epic Preset

Fortnite 7−8
+250%
2−3
−250%

This is how GeForce MX350 and NVS 3100M compete in popular games:

  • GeForce MX350 is 2500% faster in 1080p
  • GeForce MX350 is 2600% faster in 1440p
  • GeForce MX350 is 2500% faster in 4K

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive, with 1440p resolution and the High Preset, the GeForce MX350 is 5100% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

  • Without exception, GeForce MX350 surpassed NVS 3100M in all 30 of our tests.

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 6.28 0.46
Recency 10 February 2020 7 January 2010
Maximum RAM amount 2 GB 512 MB
Chip lithography 14 nm 40 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 20 Watt 14 Watt

GeForce MX350 has a 1265.2% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 10 years, a 300% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 185.7% more advanced lithography process.

NVS 3100M, on the other hand, has 42.9% lower power consumption.

The GeForce MX350 is our recommended choice as it beats the NVS 3100M in performance tests.

Be aware that GeForce MX350 is a notebook graphics card while NVS 3100M is a mobile workstation one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce MX350
GeForce MX350
NVIDIA NVS 3100M
NVS 3100M

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.5 1667 votes

Rate GeForce MX350 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.1 138 votes

Rate NVS 3100M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can give us your opinion about GeForce MX350 or NVS 3100M, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.