Radeon Pro Vega II Duo vs GeForce MX250

VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared GeForce MX250 with Radeon Pro Vega II Duo, including specs and performance data.

GeForce MX250
2019
2 GB GDDR5, 10 Watt
6.25

Pro Vega II Duo outperforms MX250 by a whopping 481% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking573129
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data6.91
Power efficiency43.285.30
ArchitecturePascal (2016−2021)GCN 5.1 (2018−2022)
GPU code nameGP108BVega 20
Market segmentLaptopWorkstation
Release date20 February 2019 (5 years ago)3 June 2019 (5 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$4,399

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores3844096
Core clock speed937 MHz1400 MHz
Boost clock speed1038 MHz1720 MHz
Number of transistors1,800 million13,230 million
Manufacturing process technology14 nm7 nm
Power consumption (TDP)10 Watt475 Watt
Texture fill rate24.91440.3
Floating-point processing power0.7972 TFLOPS14.09 TFLOPS
ROPs1664
TMUs24256

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizelargeno data
InterfacePCIe 3.0 x4Apple MPX
Widthno dataQuad-slot
Supplementary power connectorsNoneNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5HBM2
Maximum RAM amount2 GB32 GB
Memory bus width64 Bit4096 Bit
Memory clock speed1502 MHz1000 MHz
Memory bandwidth48.06 GB/s1.02 TB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsPortable Device Dependent1x HDMI 2.0b, 4x Thunderbolt
HDMI-+

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)12 (12_1)
Shader Model6.7 (6.4)6.7
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL3.02.1
Vulkan1.31.3
CUDA6.1-

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

GeForce MX250 6.25
Pro Vega II Duo 36.33
+481%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

GeForce MX250 2411
Pro Vega II Duo 14018
+481%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD22
−445%
120−130
+445%

Cost per frame, $

1080pno data36.66

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 14
−471%
80−85
+471%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 19
−479%
110−120
+479%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 13
−477%
75−80
+477%
Battlefield 5 21
−471%
120−130
+471%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 18
−456%
100−105
+456%
Cyberpunk 2077 11
−445%
60−65
+445%
Far Cry 5 22
−445%
120−130
+445%
Far Cry New Dawn 27
−456%
150−160
+456%
Forza Horizon 4 46
−465%
260−270
+465%
Hitman 3 16
−463%
90−95
+463%
Horizon Zero Dawn 118
−451%
650−700
+451%
Metro Exodus 25
−460%
140−150
+460%
Red Dead Redemption 2 28
−471%
160−170
+471%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 35
−471%
200−210
+471%
Watch Dogs: Legion 76
−426%
400−450
+426%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 24
−442%
130−140
+442%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 8−9
−463%
45−50
+463%
Battlefield 5 17
−459%
95−100
+459%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 17
−459%
95−100
+459%
Cyberpunk 2077 10−11
−450%
55−60
+450%
Far Cry 5 19
−479%
110−120
+479%
Far Cry New Dawn 17
−459%
95−100
+459%
Forza Horizon 4 43
−458%
240−250
+458%
Hitman 3 16
−463%
90−95
+463%
Horizon Zero Dawn 115
−465%
650−700
+465%
Metro Exodus 19
−479%
110−120
+479%
Red Dead Redemption 2 16
−463%
90−95
+463%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 22
−445%
120−130
+445%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 20−22
−450%
110−120
+450%
Watch Dogs: Legion 71
−463%
400−450
+463%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 7
−471%
40−45
+471%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 8−9
−463%
45−50
+463%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 12
−442%
65−70
+442%
Cyberpunk 2077 10−11
−450%
55−60
+450%
Far Cry 5 13
−477%
75−80
+477%
Forza Horizon 4 16
−463%
90−95
+463%
Hitman 3 12−14
−477%
75−80
+477%
Horizon Zero Dawn 16
−463%
90−95
+463%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 16
−463%
90−95
+463%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 12
−442%
65−70
+442%
Watch Dogs: Legion 50−55
−469%
290−300
+469%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 18
−456%
100−105
+456%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5 12−14
−442%
65−70
+442%
Far Cry New Dawn 10−11
−450%
55−60
+450%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 6−7
−400%
30−33
+400%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 1−2
−400%
5−6
+400%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 6−7
−400%
30−33
+400%
Cyberpunk 2077 3−4
−433%
16−18
+433%
Far Cry 5 7−8
−471%
40−45
+471%
Forza Horizon 4 20−22
−450%
110−120
+450%
Hitman 3 10−11
−450%
55−60
+450%
Horizon Zero Dawn 14−16
−471%
80−85
+471%
Metro Exodus 6−7
−400%
30−33
+400%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 2−3
−400%
10−11
+400%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 5−6
−440%
27−30
+440%
Watch Dogs: Legion 40−45
−475%
230−240
+475%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 10−12
−445%
60−65
+445%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5 5−6
−440%
27−30
+440%
Far Cry New Dawn 4−5
−425%
21−24
+425%
Hitman 3 2−3
−400%
10−11
+400%
Horizon Zero Dawn 16−18
−463%
90−95
+463%
Metro Exodus 3−4
−433%
16−18
+433%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 3−4
−433%
16−18
+433%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 4−5
−425%
21−24
+425%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 3−4
−433%
16−18
+433%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 3−4
−433%
16−18
+433%
Cyberpunk 2077 0−1 0−1
Far Cry 5 3−4
−433%
16−18
+433%
Forza Horizon 4 6−7
−400%
30−33
+400%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 1−2
−400%
5−6
+400%
Watch Dogs: Legion 2−3
−400%
10−11
+400%

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 7−8
−471%
40−45
+471%

This is how GeForce MX250 and Pro Vega II Duo compete in popular games:

  • Pro Vega II Duo is 445% faster in 1080p

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 6.25 36.33
Recency 20 February 2019 3 June 2019
Maximum RAM amount 2 GB 32 GB
Chip lithography 14 nm 7 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 10 Watt 475 Watt

GeForce MX250 has 4650% lower power consumption.

Pro Vega II Duo, on the other hand, has a 481.3% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 3 months, a 1500% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 100% more advanced lithography process.

The Radeon Pro Vega II Duo is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce MX250 in performance tests.

Be aware that GeForce MX250 is a notebook card while Radeon Pro Vega II Duo is a workstation one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce MX250
GeForce MX250
AMD Radeon Pro Vega II Duo
Radeon Pro Vega II Duo

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.6 1538 votes

Rate GeForce MX250 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.9 182 votes

Rate Radeon Pro Vega II Duo on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.