Radeon PRO V710 vs GeForce MX230

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared GeForce MX230 with Radeon PRO V710, including specs and performance data.

GeForce MX230
2019
2 GB GDDR5, 10 Watt
4.14

PRO V710 outperforms MX230 by a whopping 617% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking694192
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency33.3215.12
ArchitecturePascal (2016−2021)RDNA 3.0 (2022−2025)
GPU code nameGP108Navi 32
Market segmentLaptopWorkstation
Release date21 February 2019 (6 years ago)3 October 2024 (less than a year ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores2563456
Core clock speed1519 MHz1900 MHz
Boost clock speed1582 MHz2000 MHz
Number of transistors1,800 million28,100 million
Manufacturing process technology14 nm5 nm
Power consumption (TDP)10 Watt158 Watt
Texture fill rate25.31432.0
Floating-point processing power0.81 TFLOPS27.65 TFLOPS
ROPs1696
TMUs16216
Ray Tracing Coresno data54
L0 Cacheno data864 KB
L1 Cache96 KB768 KB
L2 Cache512 KB2 MB
L3 Cacheno data54 MB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizemedium sizedno data
InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCIe 4.0 x16
Widthno data1-slot
Supplementary power connectorsNone1x 8-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount2 GB28 GB
Memory bus width64 Bit224 Bit
Memory clock speed1502 MHz2250 MHz
Memory bandwidth48.06 GB/s504.0 GB/s
Shared memory--
Resizable BAR-+

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsNo outputs

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Optimus+-

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model6.46.8
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL1.22.2
Vulkan1.2.1311.3
CUDA+-

Synthetic benchmarks

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score.

GeForce MX230 4.14
PRO V710 29.69
+617%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

GeForce MX230 Samples: 914 1829
PRO V710 13129
+618%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD21
−614%
150−160
+614%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Counter-Strike 2 18−20
−584%
130−140
+584%
Cyberpunk 2077 9−10
−567%
60−65
+567%
Hogwarts Legacy 10−11
−600%
70−75
+600%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Battlefield 5 20
−600%
140−150
+600%
Counter-Strike 2 18−20
−584%
130−140
+584%
Cyberpunk 2077 9−10
−567%
60−65
+567%
Far Cry 5 15
−567%
100−105
+567%
Fortnite 33
−597%
230−240
+597%
Forza Horizon 4 21
−614%
150−160
+614%
Forza Horizon 5 12−14
−608%
85−90
+608%
Hogwarts Legacy 10−11
−600%
70−75
+600%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 24
−608%
170−180
+608%
Valorant 55−60
−602%
400−450
+602%

Full HD
High Preset

Battlefield 5 16
−588%
110−120
+588%
Counter-Strike 2 18−20
−584%
130−140
+584%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 65
−592%
450−500
+592%
Cyberpunk 2077 9−10
−567%
60−65
+567%
Dota 2 58
−590%
400−450
+590%
Far Cry 5 13
−592%
90−95
+592%
Fortnite 20
−600%
140−150
+600%
Forza Horizon 4 16
−588%
110−120
+588%
Forza Horizon 5 12−14
−608%
85−90
+608%
Grand Theft Auto V 19
−584%
130−140
+584%
Hogwarts Legacy 10−11
−600%
70−75
+600%
Metro Exodus 4
−575%
27−30
+575%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 21
−614%
150−160
+614%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 15
−567%
100−105
+567%
Valorant 55−60
−602%
400−450
+602%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 12
−608%
85−90
+608%
Cyberpunk 2077 9−10
−567%
60−65
+567%
Dota 2 43
−598%
300−310
+598%
Far Cry 5 12
−608%
85−90
+608%
Forza Horizon 4 12
−608%
85−90
+608%
Hogwarts Legacy 10−11
−600%
70−75
+600%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 17
−606%
120−130
+606%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 9
−567%
60−65
+567%
Valorant 55−60
−602%
400−450
+602%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Fortnite 16
−588%
110−120
+588%

1440p
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 8−9
−588%
55−60
+588%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 30−35
−606%
240−250
+606%
Grand Theft Auto V 4−5
−575%
27−30
+575%
Metro Exodus 3−4
−600%
21−24
+600%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 30−35
−597%
230−240
+597%
Valorant 45−50
−538%
300−310
+538%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 3−4
−600%
21−24
+600%
Cyberpunk 2077 3−4
−600%
21−24
+600%
Far Cry 5 8−9
−588%
55−60
+588%
Forza Horizon 4 10−12
−582%
75−80
+582%
Hogwarts Legacy 5−6
−600%
35−40
+600%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 6−7
−567%
40−45
+567%

1440p
Epic Preset

Fortnite 9−10
−567%
60−65
+567%

4K
High Preset

Grand Theft Auto V 16−18
−606%
120−130
+606%
Valorant 21−24
−582%
150−160
+582%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 1−2
−600%
7−8
+600%
Cyberpunk 2077 1−2
−600%
7−8
+600%
Dota 2 14−16
−567%
100−105
+567%
Far Cry 5 3−4
−600%
21−24
+600%
Forza Horizon 4 6−7
−567%
40−45
+567%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 5−6
−600%
35−40
+600%

4K
Epic Preset

Fortnite 5−6
−600%
35−40
+600%

This is how GeForce MX230 and PRO V710 compete in popular games:

  • PRO V710 is 614% faster in 1080p

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 4.14 29.69
Recency 21 February 2019 3 October 2024
Maximum RAM amount 2 GB 28 GB
Chip lithography 14 nm 5 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 10 Watt 158 Watt

GeForce MX230 has 1480% lower power consumption.

PRO V710, on the other hand, has a 617.1% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 5 years, a 1300% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 180% more advanced lithography process.

The Radeon PRO V710 is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce MX230 in performance tests.

Be aware that GeForce MX230 is a notebook graphics card while Radeon PRO V710 is a workstation one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce MX230
GeForce MX230
AMD Radeon PRO V710
Radeon PRO V710

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.4 1466 votes

Rate GeForce MX230 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
5 2 votes

Rate Radeon PRO V710 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about GeForce MX230 or Radeon PRO V710, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.