Radeon RX 7700 vs GeForce MX150

Place in the ranking	594	40
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Power efficiency	40.74	20.17
Architecture	Pascal (2016−2021)	RDNA 3.0 (2022−2024)
GPU code name	GP108	Navi 32
Market segment	Laptop	Desktop
Release date	17 May 2017 (7 years ago)	2023 (2 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)	no data	$479

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	384	3072
Core clock speed	937 MHz	1900 MHz
Boost clock speed	1038 MHz	2600 MHz
Number of transistors	1,800 million	28,100 million
Manufacturing process technology	14 nm	5 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	10 Watt	200 Watt
Texture fill rate	24.91	499.2
Floating-point processing power	0.7972 TFLOPS	31.95 TFLOPS
ROPs	16	96
TMUs	24	192
Ray Tracing Cores	no data	48

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop size	large	no data
Interface	PCIe 3.0 x16	PCIe 4.0 x16
Length	no data	267 mm
Width	no data	2-slot
Supplementary power connectors	None	1x 8-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	GDDR5	GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount	4 GB	12 GB
Memory bus width	64 Bit	192 Bit
Memory clock speed	1253 MHz	2250 MHz
Memory bandwidth	40.1 GB/s	432.0 GB/s
Shared memory	-	-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors	No outputs	1x HDMI 2.1a, 2x DisplayPort 2.1, 1x USB Type-C
HDMI	-	+

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	12 (12_1)	12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model	6.4	6.7
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
OpenCL	1.2	2.2
Vulkan	1.2.131	1.3
CUDA	6.1	-

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

GeForce MX150 5.91

RX 7700 58.52
+890%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

GeForce MX150 2270

RX 7700 22496
+891%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD	26 −862%	250−260 +862%
1440p	28 −864%	270−280 +864%
4K	20 −850%	190−200 +850%

Cost per frame, $

1080p	no data	1.92
1440p	no data	1.77
4K	no data	2.52

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Counter-Strike 2	12−14 −817%	110−120 +817%
Cyberpunk 2077	12−14 −817%	110−120 +817%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Battlefield 5	15 −833%	140−150 +833%
Counter-Strike 2	12−14 −817%	110−120 +817%
Cyberpunk 2077	9 −844%	85−90 +844%
Forza Horizon 4	27 −863%	260−270 +863%
Forza Horizon 5	12−14 −817%	110−120 +817%
Metro Exodus	18 −844%	170−180 +844%
Red Dead Redemption 2	27 −863%	260−270 +863%
Valorant	24 −858%	230−240 +858%

Full HD
High Preset

Battlefield 5	21 −852%	200−210 +852%
Counter-Strike 2	12−14 −817%	110−120 +817%
Cyberpunk 2077	3 −800%	27−30 +800%
Dota 2	40 −775%	350−400 +775%
Far Cry 5	42 −852%	400−450 +852%
Fortnite	29 −866%	280−290 +866%
Forza Horizon 4	21 −852%	200−210 +852%
Forza Horizon 5	12−14 −817%	110−120 +817%
Grand Theft Auto V	26 −862%	250−260 +862%
Metro Exodus	11 −809%	100−105 +809%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	56 −882%	550−600 +882%
Red Dead Redemption 2	16−18 −841%	160−170 +841%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	22 −855%	210−220 +855%
Valorant	17 −841%	160−170 +841%
World of Tanks	87 −877%	850−900 +877%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5	14 −829%	130−140 +829%
Counter-Strike 2	12−14 −817%	110−120 +817%
Cyberpunk 2077	12−14 −817%	110−120 +817%
Dota 2	62 −868%	600−650 +868%
Far Cry 5	26 −862%	250−260 +862%
Forza Horizon 4	16 −838%	150−160 +838%
Forza Horizon 5	12−14 −817%	110−120 +817%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	19 −847%	180−190 +847%
Valorant	18−20 −847%	180−190 +847%

1440p
High Preset

Dota 2	6−7 −817%	55−60 +817%
Grand Theft Auto V	6−7 −817%	55−60 +817%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	43 −830%	400−450 +830%
Red Dead Redemption 2	5−6 −800%	45−50 +800%
World of Tanks	55 −809%	500−550 +809%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5	10−11 −850%	95−100 +850%
Counter-Strike 2	30−35 −838%	300−310 +838%
Cyberpunk 2077	5−6 −800%	45−50 +800%
Far Cry 5	12−14 −817%	110−120 +817%
Forza Horizon 4	10−12 −809%	100−105 +809%
Forza Horizon 5	8−9 −838%	75−80 +838%
Metro Exodus	7−8 −829%	65−70 +829%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	9−10 −844%	85−90 +844%
Valorant	16−18 −838%	150−160 +838%

4K
High Preset

Dota 2	16−18 −841%	160−170 +841%
Grand Theft Auto V	16−18 −841%	160−170 +841%
Metro Exodus	1−2 −800%	9−10 +800%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	21 −852%	200−210 +852%
Red Dead Redemption 2	4−5 −775%	35−40 +775%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	16−18 −841%	160−170 +841%
World of Tanks	30 −867%	290−300 +867%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5	5−6 −800%	45−50 +800%
Cyberpunk 2077	2−3 −800%	18−20 +800%
Dota 2	24 −858%	230−240 +858%
Far Cry 5	7−8 −829%	65−70 +829%
Fortnite	5−6 −800%	45−50 +800%
Forza Horizon 4	6−7 −817%	55−60 +817%
Forza Horizon 5	3−4 −800%	27−30 +800%
Valorant	5−6 −800%	45−50 +800%

This is how GeForce MX150 and RX 7700 compete in popular games:

RX 7700 is 862% faster in 1080p
RX 7700 is 864% faster in 1440p
RX 7700 is 850% faster in 4K

Pros & cons summary

Performance score	5.91	58.52
Maximum RAM amount	4 GB	12 GB
Chip lithography	14 nm	5 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	10 Watt	200 Watt

GeForce MX150 has 1900% lower power consumption.

RX 7700, on the other hand, has a 890.2% higher aggregate performance score, a 200% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 180% more advanced lithography process.

The Radeon RX 7700 is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce MX150 in performance tests.

Be aware that GeForce MX150 is a notebook card while Radeon RX 7700 is a desktop one.

Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.