Radeon R7 M465 vs GeForce MX150

Place in performance ranking	557	755
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation	1.15	no data
Architecture	Pascal (2016−2021)	GCN (2011−2017)
GPU code name	N17S-G1	Litho XT
Market segment	Laptop	Laptop
Release date	16 May 2017 (7 years ago)	1 January 2017 (7 years ago)
Current price	$1049	no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	384	384
Core clock speed	1468 MHz	825 MHz
Boost clock speed	1532 MHz	960 MHz
Number of transistors	1,800 million	1,550 million
Manufacturing process technology	14 nm	28 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	25 Watt (10 - 25 Watt TGP)	no data
Texture fill rate	24.91	27.00
Floating-point performance	1,127 gflops	864.0 gflops

Form factor & compatibility

Information on GeForce MX150 and Radeon R7 M465 compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For notebook video cards it's notebook size, connection slot and bus, if the video card is inserted into a slot instead of being soldered to the notebook motherboard.

Laptop size	large	medium sized
Interface	PCIe 3.0 x16	PCIe 3.0 x8
Supplementary power connectors	None	no data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount	4 GB	2 GB
Memory bus width	64 Bit	128 Bit
Memory clock speed	6008 MHz	4000 MHz
Memory bandwidth	40.1 GB/s	14.4 GB/s
Shared memory	-	-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors

No outputs

API compatibility

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	12 (12_1)	12 (12_0)
Shader Model	6.4	6.3
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
OpenCL	1.2	2.0
Vulkan	1.2.131	1.2.131
CUDA	6.1	no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark performance comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

GeForce MX150 5.90
+108%

R7 M465 2.83

GeForce MX150 outperforms Radeon R7 M465 by 108% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark, part of Passmark PerformanceTest suite. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Benchmark coverage: 25%

GeForce MX150 2279
+108%

R7 M465 1095

GeForce MX150 outperforms Radeon R7 M465 by 108% in Passmark.

3DMark Fire Strike Graphics

Fire Strike is a DirectX 11 benchmark for gaming PCs. It features two separate tests displaying a fight between a humanoid and a fiery creature made of lava. Using 1920x1080 resolution, Fire Strike shows off some realistic graphics and is quite taxing on hardware.

Benchmark coverage: 14%

GeForce MX150 3488
+100%

R7 M465 1740

GeForce MX150 outperforms Radeon R7 M465 by 100% in 3DMark Fire Strike Graphics.

3DMark Cloud Gate GPU

Cloud Gate is an outdated DirectX 11 feature level 10 benchmark that was used for home PCs and basic notebooks. It displays a few scenes of some weird space teleportation device launching spaceships into unknown, using fixed resolution of 1280x720. Just like Ice Storm benchmark, it has been discontinued in January 2020 and replaced by 3DMark Night Raid.

Benchmark coverage: 14%

GeForce MX150 19132
+56.2%

R7 M465 12250

GeForce MX150 outperforms Radeon R7 M465 by 56% in 3DMark Cloud Gate GPU.

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD	27 +125%	12−14 −125%
1440p	35 +119%	16−18 −119%
4K	19 +111%	9−10 −111%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077

10−11
+100%

5−6

−100%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	19 +375%	4−5 −375%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	6−7 +200%	2−3 −200%
Battlefield 5	26 +420%	5−6 −420%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	21 +250%	6−7 −250%
Cyberpunk 2077	11 +120%	5−6 −120%
Far Cry 5	20 +81.8%	10−12 −81.8%
Far Cry New Dawn	24 +380%	5−6 −380%
Forza Horizon 4	25 +150%	10−11 −150%
Hitman 3	12−14 +85.7%	7−8 −85.7%
Horizon Zero Dawn	36 +125%	16−18 −125%
Metro Exodus	23 +1050%	2−3 −1050%
Red Dead Redemption 2	27 +286%	7−8 −286%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	27 +125%	12−14 −125%
Watch Dogs: Legion	14 +367%	3−4 −367%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	13 +225%	4−5 −225%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	6−7 +200%	2−3 −200%
Battlefield 5	18 +260%	5−6 −260%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	15 +150%	6−7 −150%
Cyberpunk 2077	7 +40%	5−6 −40%
Far Cry 5	42 +282%	10−12 −282%
Far Cry New Dawn	9 +80%	5−6 −80%
Forza Horizon 4	21 +110%	10−11 −110%
Hitman 3	12−14 +85.7%	7−8 −85.7%
Horizon Zero Dawn	26 +62.5%	16−18 −62.5%
Metro Exodus	17 +750%	2−3 −750%
Red Dead Redemption 2	20 +186%	7−8 −186%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	15 +25%	12−14 −25%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	19 +171%	7−8 −171%
Watch Dogs: Legion	11 +267%	3−4 −267%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	7 +75%	4−5 −75%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	6−7 +200%	2−3 −200%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	12−14 +117%	6−7 −117%
Cyberpunk 2077	10−11 +100%	5−6 −100%
Far Cry 5	12 +9.1%	10−12 −9.1%
Forza Horizon 4	14 +40%	10−11 −40%
Horizon Zero Dawn	16 +0%	16−18 +0%
Metro Exodus	15 +650%	2−3 −650%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	11 +57.1%	7−8 −57.1%
Watch Dogs: Legion	9−10 +200%	3−4 −200%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

16−18
+129%

7−8

−129%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5	10−12 +120%	5−6 −120%
Far Cry New Dawn	8−9 +167%	3−4 −167%
Hitman 3	6−7 +200%	2−3 −200%
Red Dead Redemption 2	4−5 +300%	1−2 −300%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	4−5	0−1
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	1−2	0−1
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	8−9 +60%	5−6 −60%
Cyberpunk 2077	3−4 +200%	1−2 −200%
Far Cry 5	9−10 +125%	4−5 −125%
Forza Horizon 4	10−11 +150%	4−5 −150%
Horizon Zero Dawn	12−14 +85.7%	7−8 −85.7%
Metro Exodus	5−6 +150%	2−3 −150%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	1−2	0−1
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	5−6 +66.7%	3−4 −66.7%
Watch Dogs: Legion	3−4 +200%	1−2 −200%

4K
High Preset

Far Cry 5	21 +133%	9−10 −133%
Far Cry New Dawn	4−5 +300%	1−2 −300%
Hitman 3	2−3	0−1
Horizon Zero Dawn	6−7 +100%	3−4 −100%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	2−3	0−1
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	2−3	0−1

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	3−4 +200%	1−2 −200%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	2−3 +100%	1−2 −100%
Battlefield 5	1−2	0−1
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	3−4 +200%	1−2 −200%
Cyberpunk 2077	0−1	0−1
Forza Horizon 4	6−7	0−1
Horizon Zero Dawn	6−7 +100%	3−4 −100%
Metro Exodus	7−8 +40%	5−6 −40%
Watch Dogs: Legion	2−3	0−1