Quadro RTX 6000 vs GeForce MX150

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared GeForce MX150 with Quadro RTX 6000, including specs and performance data.

GeForce MX150
2017
4 GB GDDR5, 10 Watt
5.45

RTX 6000 outperforms MX150 by a whopping 720% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking61377
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data6.04
Power efficiency39.9412.60
ArchitecturePascal (2016−2021)Turing (2018−2022)
GPU code nameGP108TU102
Market segmentLaptopWorkstation
Release date17 May 2017 (7 years ago)13 August 2018 (6 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$6,299

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the performance-to-price ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices for comparison.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores3844608
Core clock speed937 MHz1440 MHz
Boost clock speed1038 MHz1770 MHz
Number of transistors1,800 million18,600 million
Manufacturing process technology14 nm12 nm
Power consumption (TDP)10 Watt260 Watt
Texture fill rate24.91509.8
Floating-point processing power0.7972 TFLOPS16.31 TFLOPS
ROPs1696
TMUs24288
Tensor Coresno data576
Ray Tracing Coresno data72

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizelargeno data
InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCIe 3.0 x16
Lengthno data267 mm
Widthno data2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsNone1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount4 GB24 GB
Memory bus width64 Bit384 Bit
Memory clock speed1253 MHz1750 MHz
Memory bandwidth40.1 GB/s672.0 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputs4x DisplayPort, 1x USB Type-C

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)12 Ultimate (12_1)
Shader Model6.46.5
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL1.22.0
Vulkan1.2.1311.2.131
CUDA6.17.5
DLSS-+

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score.

GeForce MX150 5.45
RTX 6000 44.70
+720%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

GeForce MX150 2261
RTX 6000 18558
+721%

GeekBench 5 OpenCL

Geekbench 5 is a widespread graphics card benchmark combined from 11 different test scenarios. All these scenarios rely on direct usage of GPU's processing power, no 3D rendering is involved. This variation uses OpenCL API by Khronos Group.

GeForce MX150 9579
RTX 6000 147566
+1441%

GeekBench 5 Vulkan

Geekbench 5 is a widespread graphics card benchmark combined from 11 different test scenarios. All these scenarios rely on direct usage of GPU's processing power, no 3D rendering is involved. This variation uses Vulkan API by AMD & Khronos Group.

GeForce MX150 8298
RTX 6000 126998
+1430%

GeekBench 5 CUDA

Geekbench 5 is a widespread graphics card benchmark combined from 11 different test scenarios. All these scenarios rely on direct usage of GPU's processing power, no 3D rendering is involved. This variation uses CUDA API by NVIDIA.

GeForce MX150 9799
RTX 6000 159550
+1528%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD27
−715%
220−230
+715%
1440p30
−700%
240−250
+700%
4K19
−689%
150−160
+689%

Cost per frame, $

1080pno data28.63
1440pno data26.25
4Kno data41.99

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Counter-Strike 2 24−27
−700%
200−210
+700%
Cyberpunk 2077 10−12
−718%
90−95
+718%
Hogwarts Legacy 10−11
−700%
80−85
+700%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Battlefield 5 39
−669%
300−310
+669%
Counter-Strike 2 24−27
−700%
200−210
+700%
Cyberpunk 2077 11
−718%
90−95
+718%
Far Cry 5 17
−665%
130−140
+665%
Fortnite 59
−663%
450−500
+663%
Forza Horizon 4 25
−700%
200−210
+700%
Forza Horizon 5 14−16
−700%
120−130
+700%
Hogwarts Legacy 10−11
−700%
80−85
+700%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 26
−708%
210−220
+708%
Valorant 100
−700%
800−850
+700%

Full HD
High Preset

Battlefield 5 32
−713%
260−270
+713%
Counter-Strike 2 24−27
−700%
200−210
+700%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 87
−705%
700−750
+705%
Cyberpunk 2077 7
−686%
55−60
+686%
Dota 2 68
−709%
550−600
+709%
Far Cry 5 16
−713%
130−140
+713%
Fortnite 34
−694%
270−280
+694%
Forza Horizon 4 21
−710%
170−180
+710%
Forza Horizon 5 14−16
−700%
120−130
+700%
Grand Theft Auto V 26
−708%
210−220
+708%
Hogwarts Legacy 10−11
−700%
80−85
+700%
Metro Exodus 6
−650%
45−50
+650%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 22
−718%
180−190
+718%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 19
−689%
150−160
+689%
Valorant 100
−700%
800−850
+700%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 26
−708%
210−220
+708%
Cyberpunk 2077 10−12
−718%
90−95
+718%
Dota 2 62
−706%
500−550
+706%
Far Cry 5 14
−686%
110−120
+686%
Forza Horizon 4 14
−686%
110−120
+686%
Hogwarts Legacy 10−11
−700%
80−85
+700%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 15
−700%
120−130
+700%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 11
−718%
90−95
+718%
Valorant 65−70
−669%
500−550
+669%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Fortnite 24
−692%
190−200
+692%

1440p
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 9−10
−678%
70−75
+678%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 55
−718%
450−500
+718%
Grand Theft Auto V 6−7
−650%
45−50
+650%
Metro Exodus 5−6
−700%
40−45
+700%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 43
−714%
350−400
+714%
Valorant 66
−658%
500−550
+658%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 7−8
−686%
55−60
+686%
Cyberpunk 2077 4−5
−650%
30−33
+650%
Far Cry 5 12−14
−692%
95−100
+692%
Forza Horizon 4 12−14
−669%
100−105
+669%
Hogwarts Legacy 6−7
−650%
45−50
+650%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 8−9
−713%
65−70
+713%

1440p
Epic Preset

Fortnite 10−12
−718%
90−95
+718%

4K
High Preset

Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 30
−700%
240−250
+700%
Grand Theft Auto V 16−18
−665%
130−140
+665%
Hogwarts Legacy 1−2
−700%
8−9
+700%
Metro Exodus 0−1 0−1
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 3−4
−700%
24−27
+700%
Valorant 33
−718%
270−280
+718%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 3−4
−700%
24−27
+700%
Cyberpunk 2077 2−3
−700%
16−18
+700%
Dota 2 24
−692%
190−200
+692%
Far Cry 5 6−7
−650%
45−50
+650%
Forza Horizon 4 8−9
−713%
65−70
+713%
Hogwarts Legacy 1−2
−700%
8−9
+700%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 6−7
−650%
45−50
+650%

4K
Epic Preset

Fortnite 6−7
−650%
45−50
+650%

This is how GeForce MX150 and RTX 6000 compete in popular games:

  • RTX 6000 is 715% faster in 1080p
  • RTX 6000 is 700% faster in 1440p
  • RTX 6000 is 689% faster in 4K

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 5.45 44.70
Recency 17 May 2017 13 August 2018
Maximum RAM amount 4 GB 24 GB
Chip lithography 14 nm 12 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 10 Watt 260 Watt

GeForce MX150 has 2500% lower power consumption.

RTX 6000, on the other hand, has a 720.2% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 1 year, a 500% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 16.7% more advanced lithography process.

The Quadro RTX 6000 is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce MX150 in performance tests.

Be aware that GeForce MX150 is a notebook card while Quadro RTX 6000 is a workstation one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce MX150
GeForce MX150
NVIDIA Quadro RTX 6000
Quadro RTX 6000

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.5 1704 votes

Rate GeForce MX150 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.7 134 votes

Rate Quadro RTX 6000 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about GeForce MX150 or Quadro RTX 6000, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.