GeForce GT 710M vs MX150

VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared GeForce MX150 and GeForce GT 710M, covering specs and all relevant benchmarks.

GeForce MX150
2017
4 GB GDDR5, 10 Watt
5.90
+413%

MX150 outperforms GT 710M by a whopping 413% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking5921074
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency40.615.28
ArchitecturePascal (2016−2021)Fermi 2.0 (2010−2014)
GPU code nameGP108GF117
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
Release date17 May 2017 (7 years ago)9 January 2013 (12 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores38496
Core clock speed937 MHz775 MHz
Boost clock speed1038 MHzno data
Number of transistors1,800 million585 million
Manufacturing process technology14 nm28 nm
Power consumption (TDP)10 Watt15 Watt
Texture fill rate24.9112.40
Floating-point processing power0.7972 TFLOPS0.2976 TFLOPS
ROPs168
TMUs2416

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizelargeno data
InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCIe 2.0 x16
Supplementary power connectorsNoneno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5DDR3
Maximum RAM amount4 GB1 GB
Memory bus width64 Bit64 Bit
Memory clock speed1253 MHz900 MHz
Memory bandwidth40.1 GB/s14.4 GB/s
Shared memory-no data

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsNo outputs

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)12 (11_0)
Shader Model6.45.1
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL1.21.1
Vulkan1.2.131N/A
CUDA6.12.1

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

GeForce MX150 5.90
+413%
GT 710M 1.15

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

GeForce MX150 2269
+415%
GT 710M 441

GeekBench 5 OpenCL

Geekbench 5 is a widespread graphics card benchmark combined from 11 different test scenarios. All these scenarios rely on direct usage of GPU's processing power, no 3D rendering is involved. This variation uses OpenCL API by Khronos Group.

GeForce MX150 9594
+298%
GT 710M 2413

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD26
+420%
5−6
−420%
1440p28
+460%
5−6
−460%
4K20
+567%
3−4
−567%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Counter-Strike 2 12−14
+550%
2−3
−550%
Cyberpunk 2077 12−14
+500%
2−3
−500%
Elden Ring 14−16
+650%
2−3
−650%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Battlefield 5 15
+650%
2−3
−650%
Counter-Strike 2 12−14
+550%
2−3
−550%
Cyberpunk 2077 9
+800%
1−2
−800%
Forza Horizon 4 27
+440%
5−6
−440%
Metro Exodus 18
+500%
3−4
−500%
Red Dead Redemption 2 27
+440%
5−6
−440%
Valorant 24
+500%
4−5
−500%

Full HD
High Preset

Battlefield 5 21
+425%
4−5
−425%
Counter-Strike 2 12−14
+550%
2−3
−550%
Cyberpunk 2077 3 0−1
Dota 2 40
+471%
7−8
−471%
Elden Ring 13
+550%
2−3
−550%
Far Cry 5 42
+425%
8−9
−425%
Fortnite 29
+480%
5−6
−480%
Forza Horizon 4 21
+425%
4−5
−425%
Grand Theft Auto V 26
+420%
5−6
−420%
Metro Exodus 11
+450%
2−3
−450%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 56
+460%
10−11
−460%
Red Dead Redemption 2 16−18
+467%
3−4
−467%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 22
+450%
4−5
−450%
Valorant 17
+467%
3−4
−467%
World of Tanks 87
+444%
16−18
−444%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 14
+600%
2−3
−600%
Counter-Strike 2 12−14
+550%
2−3
−550%
Cyberpunk 2077 12−14
+500%
2−3
−500%
Dota 2 62
+417%
12−14
−417%
Far Cry 5 26
+420%
5−6
−420%
Forza Horizon 4 16
+433%
3−4
−433%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 19
+533%
3−4
−533%
Valorant 16−18
+467%
3−4
−467%

1440p
High Preset

Dota 2 5−6 0−1
Elden Ring 5 0−1
Grand Theft Auto V 6−7
+500%
1−2
−500%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 43
+438%
8−9
−438%
Red Dead Redemption 2 5−6 0−1
World of Tanks 55
+450%
10−11
−450%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 10−11
+900%
1−2
−900%
Counter-Strike 2 9−10
+800%
1−2
−800%
Cyberpunk 2077 5−6 0−1
Far Cry 5 12−14
+500%
2−3
−500%
Forza Horizon 4 10−11
+900%
1−2
−900%
Metro Exodus 7−8
+600%
1−2
−600%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 7−8
+600%
1−2
−600%
Valorant 16−18
+433%
3−4
−433%

4K
High Preset

Dota 2 16−18
+467%
3−4
−467%
Elden Ring 3−4 0−1
Grand Theft Auto V 16−18
+467%
3−4
−467%
Metro Exodus 1−2 0−1
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 21
+425%
4−5
−425%
Red Dead Redemption 2 4−5 0−1
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 16−18
+467%
3−4
−467%
World of Tanks 30
+500%
5−6
−500%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 5−6 0−1
Cyberpunk 2077 2−3 0−1
Dota 2 24
+500%
4−5
−500%
Far Cry 5 7−8
+600%
1−2
−600%
Fortnite 5−6 0−1
Forza Horizon 4 5−6 0−1
Valorant 5−6 0−1

This is how GeForce MX150 and GT 710M compete in popular games:

  • GeForce MX150 is 420% faster in 1080p
  • GeForce MX150 is 460% faster in 1440p
  • GeForce MX150 is 567% faster in 4K

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 5.90 1.15
Recency 17 May 2017 9 January 2013
Maximum RAM amount 4 GB 1 GB
Chip lithography 14 nm 28 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 10 Watt 15 Watt

GeForce MX150 has a 413% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 4 years, a 300% higher maximum VRAM amount, a 100% more advanced lithography process, and 50% lower power consumption.

The GeForce MX150 is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce GT 710M in performance tests.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce MX150
GeForce MX150
NVIDIA GeForce GT 710M
GeForce GT 710M

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.5 1650 votes

Rate GeForce MX150 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3 221 vote

Rate GeForce GT 710M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.