GeForce 8800 GTS 112 vs MX150

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking657not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency41.32no data
ArchitecturePascal (2016−2021)Tesla (2006−2010)
GPU code nameGP108G80
Market segmentLaptopDesktop
Release date17 May 2017 (8 years ago)19 November 2007 (18 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores384112
Core clock speed937 MHz500 MHz
Boost clock speed1038 MHzno data
Number of transistors1,800 million681 million
Manufacturing process technology14 nm90 nm
Power consumption (TDP)10 Watt150 Watt
Texture fill rate24.9128.00
Floating-point processing power0.7972 TFLOPS0.2688 TFLOPS
ROPs1620
TMUs2428
L1 Cache144 KBno data
L2 Cache512 KB80 KB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizelargeno data
InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCIe 1.0 x16
Lengthno data267 mm
Widthno data2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsNone1x 6-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR3
Maximum RAM amount4 GB640 MB
Memory bus width64 Bit320 Bit
Memory clock speed1253 MHz800 MHz
Memory bandwidth40.1 GB/s64 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputs2x DVI, 1x S-Video

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)11.1 (10_0)
Shader Model6.44.0
OpenGL4.63.3
OpenCL1.21.1
Vulkan1.2.131N/A
CUDA6.1+

Pros & cons summary


Recency 17 May 2017 19 November 2007
Maximum RAM amount 4 GB 640 MB
Chip lithography 14 nm 90 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 10 Watt 150 Watt

GeForce MX150 has an age advantage of 9 years, a 540% higher maximum VRAM amount, a 542.9% more advanced lithography process, and 1400% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between GeForce MX150 and GeForce 8800 GTS Core 112. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that GeForce MX150 is a notebook graphics card while GeForce 8800 GTS Core 112 is a desktop one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce MX150
GeForce MX150
NVIDIA GeForce 8800 GTS Core 112
GeForce 8800 GTS Core 112

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.5 1767 votes

Rate GeForce MX150 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
1.1 309 votes

Rate GeForce 8800 GTS Core 112 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about GeForce MX150 or GeForce 8800 GTS Core 112, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.