GRID M40 vs GeForce MX150

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared GeForce MX150 with GRID M40, including specs and performance data.

GeForce MX150
2017
4 GB GDDR5, 10 Watt
5.39
+36.1%

MX150 outperforms M40 by a substantial 36% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking664748
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency41.486.10
ArchitecturePascal (2016−2021)Maxwell (2014−2017)
GPU code nameGP108GM107
Market segmentLaptopWorkstation
Release date17 May 2017 (8 years ago)18 May 2016 (9 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores384384
Core clock speed937 MHz1033 MHz
Boost clock speed1038 MHz1000 MHz
Number of transistors1,800 million1,870 million
Manufacturing process technology14 nm28 nm
Power consumption (TDP)10 Watt50 Watt
Texture fill rate24.9133.06
Floating-point processing power0.7972 TFLOPS0.7933 TFLOPS
ROPs1616
TMUs2432
L1 Cache144 KB192 KB
L2 Cache512 KB2 MB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizelargeno data
InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCIe 3.0 x16
Widthno data2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsNoneno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount4 GB8 GB
Memory bus width64 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed1253 MHz1300 MHz
Memory bandwidth40.1 GB/s83.2 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsNo outputs

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)12 (11_0)
Shader Model6.45.1
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL1.21.2
Vulkan1.2.1311.1.126
CUDA6.15.0

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD27
+50%
18−20
−50%
1440p30
+42.9%
21−24
−42.9%
4K18
+50%
12−14
−50%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low

Counter-Strike 2 24−27
+38.9%
18−20
−38.9%
Cyberpunk 2077 10−12
+37.5%
8−9
−37.5%
Hogwarts Legacy 10−12
+37.5%
8−9
−37.5%

Full HD
Medium

Battlefield 5 39
+44.4%
27−30
−44.4%
Counter-Strike 2 24−27
+38.9%
18−20
−38.9%
Cyberpunk 2077 11
+37.5%
8−9
−37.5%
Far Cry 5 17
+41.7%
12−14
−41.7%
Fortnite 59
+47.5%
40−45
−47.5%
Forza Horizon 4 25
+38.9%
18−20
−38.9%
Forza Horizon 5 14−16
+50%
10−11
−50%
Hogwarts Legacy 10−12
+37.5%
8−9
−37.5%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 26
+44.4%
18−20
−44.4%
Valorant 100
+42.9%
70−75
−42.9%

Full HD
High

Battlefield 5 32
+52.4%
21−24
−52.4%
Counter-Strike 2 24−27
+38.9%
18−20
−38.9%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 87
+45%
60−65
−45%
Cyberpunk 2077 7
+40%
5−6
−40%
Dota 2 68
+51.1%
45−50
−51.1%
Far Cry 5 16
+60%
10−11
−60%
Fortnite 34
+41.7%
24−27
−41.7%
Forza Horizon 4 21
+50%
14−16
−50%
Forza Horizon 5 14−16
+50%
10−11
−50%
Grand Theft Auto V 26
+44.4%
18−20
−44.4%
Hogwarts Legacy 10−12
+37.5%
8−9
−37.5%
Metro Exodus 6
+50%
4−5
−50%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 22
+37.5%
16−18
−37.5%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 19
+58.3%
12−14
−58.3%
Valorant 100
+42.9%
70−75
−42.9%

Full HD
Ultra

Battlefield 5 26
+44.4%
18−20
−44.4%
Cyberpunk 2077 10−12
+37.5%
8−9
−37.5%
Dota 2 62
+37.8%
45−50
−37.8%
Far Cry 5 14
+40%
10−11
−40%
Forza Horizon 4 14
+40%
10−11
−40%
Hogwarts Legacy 10−12
+37.5%
8−9
−37.5%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 15
+50%
10−11
−50%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 11
+37.5%
8−9
−37.5%
Valorant 65−70
+44.4%
45−50
−44.4%

Full HD
Epic

Fortnite 24
+50%
16−18
−50%

1440p
High

Counter-Strike 2 10−12
+37.5%
8−9
−37.5%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 55
+37.5%
40−45
−37.5%
Grand Theft Auto V 5−6
+66.7%
3−4
−66.7%
Metro Exodus 4−5
+100%
2−3
−100%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 43
+43.3%
30−33
−43.3%
Valorant 66
+46.7%
45−50
−46.7%

1440p
Ultra

Battlefield 5 7−8
+40%
5−6
−40%
Cyberpunk 2077 4−5
+100%
2−3
−100%
Far Cry 5 10−12
+37.5%
8−9
−37.5%
Forza Horizon 4 12−14
+44.4%
9−10
−44.4%
Hogwarts Legacy 6−7
+50%
4−5
−50%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 8−9
+60%
5−6
−60%

1440p
Epic

Fortnite 10−12
+37.5%
8−9
−37.5%

4K
High

Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 30
+42.9%
21−24
−42.9%
Grand Theft Auto V 16−18
+60%
10−11
−60%
Hogwarts Legacy 1−2 0−1
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 2−3
+100%
1−2
−100%
Valorant 33
+37.5%
24−27
−37.5%

4K
Ultra

Battlefield 5 3−4
+50%
2−3
−50%
Cyberpunk 2077 1−2 0−1
Dota 2 24
+50%
16−18
−50%
Far Cry 5 5−6
+66.7%
3−4
−66.7%
Forza Horizon 4 8−9
+60%
5−6
−60%
Hogwarts Legacy 1−2 0−1
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 5−6
+66.7%
3−4
−66.7%

4K
Epic

Fortnite 5−6
+66.7%
3−4
−66.7%

This is how GeForce MX150 and GRID M40 compete in popular games:

  • GeForce MX150 is 50% faster in 1080p
  • GeForce MX150 is 43% faster in 1440p
  • GeForce MX150 is 50% faster in 4K

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 5.39 3.96
Recency 17 May 2017 18 May 2016
Maximum RAM amount 4 GB 8 GB
Chip lithography 14 nm 28 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 10 Watt 50 Watt

GeForce MX150 has a 36.1% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 11 months, a 100% more advanced lithography process, and 400% lower power consumption.

GRID M40, on the other hand, has a 100% higher maximum VRAM amount.

The GeForce MX150 is our recommended choice as it beats the GRID M40 in performance tests.

Be aware that GeForce MX150 is a notebook graphics card while GRID M40 is a workstation one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce MX150
GeForce MX150
NVIDIA GRID M40
GRID M40

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.5 1799 votes

Rate GeForce MX150 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.1 8 votes

Rate GRID M40 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about GeForce MX150 or GRID M40, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.