Quadro P3000 Max-Q vs GeForce MX130

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking641not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency11.04no data
ArchitectureMaxwell (2014−2017)Pascal (2016−2021)
GPU code nameGM108N17E-Q1 Max-Q
Market segmentLaptopMobile workstation
Release date17 November 2017 (7 years ago)1 September 2017 (7 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores3841280
Core clock speed1122 MHz1075 MHz
Boost clock speed1242 MHz1240 MHz
Manufacturing process technology28 nm16 nm
Power consumption (TDP)30 Watt60 Watt
Texture fill rate29.81no data
Floating-point processing power0.9539 TFLOPSno data
ROPs8no data
TMUs24no data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizemedium sizedlarge
InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16no data
Supplementary power connectorsNoneno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount2 GB16 GB
Memory bus width64 Bit192 Bit
Memory clock speed1253 MHz7008 MHz
Memory bandwidth40.1 GB/sno data
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsno data

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Optimus++

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (11_0)12_1
Shader Model5.1no data
OpenGL4.6no data
OpenCL1.2no data
Vulkan1.1.126-
CUDA+-

Pros & cons summary


Recency 17 November 2017 1 September 2017
Maximum RAM amount 2 GB 16 GB
Chip lithography 28 nm 16 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 30 Watt 60 Watt

GeForce MX130 has an age advantage of 2 months, and 100% lower power consumption.

P3000 Max-Q, on the other hand, has a 700% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 75% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between GeForce MX130 and Quadro P3000 Max-Q. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that GeForce MX130 is a notebook graphics card while Quadro P3000 Max-Q is a mobile workstation one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce MX130
GeForce MX130
NVIDIA Quadro P3000 Max-Q
Quadro P3000 Max-Q

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.7 2208 votes

Rate GeForce MX130 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.6 8 votes

Rate Quadro P3000 Max-Q on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.