Moore Threads MTT S80 vs GeForce GTX 1070 SLI

Aggregate performance score

We've compared GeForce GTX 1070 SLI and Moore Threads MTT S80, covering specs and all relevant benchmarks.

GTX 1070 SLI
2016
2x 8 GB GDDR5, 300 Watt
35.02
+517%

GTX 1070 SLI outperforms Moore Threads MTT S80 by a whopping 517% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking142624
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency9.391.79
ArchitecturePascal (2016−2021)MUSA
GPU code namePascal GP104 SLIChunxiao
Market segmentDesktopDesktop
Release date16 August 2016 (9 years ago)no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores38404096
Core clock speed1506 MHz1800 MHz
Boost clock speed1683 MHzno data
Number of transistors14400 Million22,000 million
Manufacturing process technology16 nm12 nm
Power consumption (TDP)300 Watt255 Watt
Texture fill rateno data460.8
Floating-point processing powerno data14.75 TFLOPS
ROPsno data256
TMUsno data256
L2 Cacheno data4 MB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Interfaceno dataPCIe 5.0 x16
Lengthno data285 mm
Widthno data2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno data1x 8-pin
SLI options+-

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount2x 8 GB16 GB
Memory bus width256 Bit256 Bit
Memory clock speed8000 MHz1750 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data448.0 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectorsno data1x HDMI 2.1, 3x DisplayPort 1.4a
HDMI-+
G-SYNC support+-

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

VR Ready+no data

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12_112 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Modelno data6.5
OpenGLno data4.6
OpenCLno data3.0
Vulkan+1.4
CUDA+-

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD118
+556%
18−20
−556%
4K56
+522%
9−10
−522%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Counter-Strike 2 200−210
+590%
30−33
−590%
Cyberpunk 2077 85−90
+521%
14−16
−521%
Hogwarts Legacy 85−90
+521%
14−16
−521%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Battlefield 5 120−130
+617%
18−20
−617%
Counter-Strike 2 200−210
+590%
30−33
−590%
Cyberpunk 2077 85−90
+521%
14−16
−521%
Far Cry 5 120−130
+567%
18−20
−567%
Fortnite 280
+522%
45−50
−522%
Forza Horizon 4 140−150
+586%
21−24
−586%
Forza Horizon 5 110−120
+556%
18−20
−556%
Hogwarts Legacy 85−90
+521%
14−16
−521%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 140−150
+517%
24−27
−517%
Valorant 220−230
+529%
35−40
−529%

Full HD
High Preset

Battlefield 5 120−130
+617%
18−20
−617%
Counter-Strike 2 200−210
+590%
30−33
−590%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 270−280
+518%
45−50
−518%
Cyberpunk 2077 85−90
+521%
14−16
−521%
Dota 2 140−150
+581%
21−24
−581%
Far Cry 5 120−130
+567%
18−20
−567%
Fortnite 176
+552%
27−30
−552%
Forza Horizon 4 140−150
+586%
21−24
−586%
Forza Horizon 5 110−120
+556%
18−20
−556%
Grand Theft Auto V 87
+521%
14−16
−521%
Hogwarts Legacy 85−90
+521%
14−16
−521%
Metro Exodus 85−90
+536%
14−16
−536%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 140−150
+517%
24−27
−517%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 111
+517%
18−20
−517%
Valorant 220−230
+529%
35−40
−529%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 120−130
+617%
18−20
−617%
Cyberpunk 2077 85−90
+521%
14−16
−521%
Dota 2 140−150
+581%
21−24
−581%
Far Cry 5 120−130
+567%
18−20
−567%
Forza Horizon 4 140−150
+586%
21−24
−586%
Hogwarts Legacy 85−90
+521%
14−16
−521%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 140−150
+517%
24−27
−517%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 73
+630%
10−11
−630%
Valorant 220−230
+529%
35−40
−529%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Fortnite 123
+583%
18−20
−583%

1440p
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 90−95
+564%
14−16
−564%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 260−270
+553%
40−45
−553%
Grand Theft Auto V 75−80
+533%
12−14
−533%
Metro Exodus 50−55
+575%
8−9
−575%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 170−180
+548%
27−30
−548%
Valorant 250−260
+533%
40−45
−533%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 95−100
+586%
14−16
−586%
Cyberpunk 2077 40−45
+617%
6−7
−617%
Far Cry 5 90−95
+543%
14−16
−543%
Forza Horizon 4 100−110
+563%
16−18
−563%
Hogwarts Legacy 40−45
+529%
7−8
−529%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 70−75
+600%
10−11
−600%

1440p
Epic Preset

Fortnite 95−100
+600%
14−16
−600%

4K
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 40−45
+617%
6−7
−617%
Grand Theft Auto V 81
+575%
12−14
−575%
Hogwarts Legacy 24−27
+700%
3−4
−700%
Metro Exodus 30−35
+580%
5−6
−580%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 54
+575%
8−9
−575%
Valorant 220−230
+551%
35−40
−551%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 55−60
+556%
9−10
−556%
Counter-Strike 2 40−45
+617%
6−7
−617%
Cyberpunk 2077 18−20
+533%
3−4
−533%
Dota 2 100−110
+575%
16−18
−575%
Far Cry 5 45−50
+600%
7−8
−600%
Forza Horizon 4 70−75
+600%
10−11
−600%
Hogwarts Legacy 24−27
+700%
3−4
−700%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 45−50
+600%
7−8
−600%

4K
Epic Preset

Fortnite 38
+533%
6−7
−533%

This is how GTX 1070 SLI and Moore Threads MTT S80 compete in popular games:

  • GTX 1070 SLI is 556% faster in 1080p
  • GTX 1070 SLI is 522% faster in 4K

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 35.02 5.68
Chip lithography 16 nm 12 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 300 Watt 255 Watt

GTX 1070 SLI has a 516.5% higher aggregate performance score.

Moore Threads MTT S80, on the other hand, has a 33.3% more advanced lithography process, and 17.6% lower power consumption.

The GeForce GTX 1070 SLI is our recommended choice as it beats the Moore Threads MTT S80 in performance tests.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 SLI
GeForce GTX 1070 SLI
Moore Threads MTT S80
Moore Threads MTT S80

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4.1 214 votes

Rate GeForce GTX 1070 SLI on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4 2 votes

Rate Moore Threads MTT S80 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about GeForce GTX 1070 SLI or Moore Threads MTT S80, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.