ATI Mobility Radeon HD 4550 vs GeForce MX130

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared GeForce MX130 and Mobility Radeon HD 4550, covering specs and all relevant benchmarks.

GeForce MX130
2017
2 GB GDDR5, 30 Watt
4.33
+1137%

MX130 outperforms ATI Mobility HD 4550 by a whopping 1137% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking6931316
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency11.00no data
ArchitectureMaxwell (2014−2017)Terascale 1 (2010)
GPU code nameGM108M92
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
Release date17 November 2017 (7 years ago)1 January 2010 (15 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores38480
Core clock speed1122 MHz550 MHz
Boost clock speed1242 MHzno data
Number of transistorsno data242 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm55 nm
Power consumption (TDP)30 Wattno data
Texture fill rate29.814.400
Floating-point processing power0.9539 TFLOPS0.088 TFLOPS
ROPs84
TMUs248

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizemedium sizedno data
InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16MXM-II
Supplementary power connectorsNoneNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR3, DDR2, DDR3
Maximum RAM amount2 GB512 MB
Memory bus width64 Bit64 Bit
Memory clock speed1253 MHz700 MHz
Memory bandwidth40.1 GB/s11.2 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsNo outputs

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Optimus+-

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (11_0)10.1 (10_1)
Shader Model5.14.1
OpenGL4.63.3
OpenCL1.21.1
Vulkan1.1.126N/A
CUDA+-

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score.

GeForce MX130 4.33
+1137%
ATI Mobility HD 4550 0.35

3DMark Vantage Performance

3DMark Vantage is an outdated DirectX 10 benchmark using 1280x1024 screen resolution. It taxes the graphics card with two scenes, one depicting a girl escaping some militarized base located within a sea cave, the other displaying a space fleet attack on a defenseless planet. It was discontinued in April 2017, and Time Spy benchmark is now recommended to be used instead.

GeForce MX130 11968
+1039%
ATI Mobility HD 4550 1051

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD18
+80%
10
−80%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Counter-Strike 2 27
+1250%
2−3
−1250%
Cyberpunk 2077 4
+300%
1−2
−300%
God of War 10−11
+150%
4−5
−150%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Battlefield 5 18−20
+1700%
1−2
−1700%
Counter-Strike 2 20
+1900%
1−2
−1900%
Cyberpunk 2077 9−10
+800%
1−2
−800%
Far Cry 5 14
+1300%
1−2
−1300%
Fortnite 32
+1500%
2−3
−1500%
Forza Horizon 4 21−24
+425%
4−5
−425%
Forza Horizon 5 15
+1400%
1−2
−1400%
God of War 10−11
+150%
4−5
−150%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 23
+229%
7−8
−229%
Valorant 55−60
+119%
24−27
−119%

Full HD
High Preset

Battlefield 5 18−20
+1700%
1−2
−1700%
Counter-Strike 2 12 0−1
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 75−80
+450%
14−16
−450%
Cyberpunk 2077 9−10
+800%
1−2
−800%
Dota 2 35
+250%
10−11
−250%
Far Cry 5 13
+1200%
1−2
−1200%
Fortnite 24
+2300%
1−2
−2300%
Forza Horizon 4 21−24
+425%
4−5
−425%
Forza Horizon 5 10−12 0−1
God of War 10−11
+150%
4−5
−150%
Grand Theft Auto V 15
+1400%
1−2
−1400%
Metro Exodus 3 0−1
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 21
+200%
7−8
−200%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 14
+180%
5−6
−180%
Valorant 55−60
+119%
24−27
−119%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 18−20
+1700%
1−2
−1700%
Cyberpunk 2077 9−10
+800%
1−2
−800%
Dota 2 28
+180%
10−11
−180%
Far Cry 5 12 0−1
Forza Horizon 4 21−24
+425%
4−5
−425%
God of War 10−11
+150%
4−5
−150%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 14
+100%
7−8
−100%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 7
+40%
5−6
−40%
Valorant 55−60
+119%
24−27
−119%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Fortnite 16
+1500%
1−2
−1500%

1440p
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 8−9
+300%
2−3
−300%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 30−35 0−1
Grand Theft Auto V 4−5 0−1
Metro Exodus 3−4 0−1
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 30−35
+750%
4−5
−750%
Valorant 45−50
+1467%
3−4
−1467%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 3−4 0−1
Cyberpunk 2077 3−4 0−1
Far Cry 5 8−9 0−1
Forza Horizon 4 10−11
+900%
1−2
−900%
God of War 4−5 0−1
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 5−6 0−1

1440p
Epic Preset

Fortnite 9−10 0−1

4K
High Preset

Grand Theft Auto V 16−18
+6.7%
14−16
−6.7%
Valorant 21−24
+1000%
2−3
−1000%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 1−2 0−1
Cyberpunk 2077 1−2 0−1
Dota 2 14−16
+1400%
1−2
−1400%
Far Cry 5 3−4 0−1
Forza Horizon 4 6−7 0−1
God of War 3−4 0−1
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 5−6
+400%
1−2
−400%

4K
Epic Preset

Fortnite 5−6
+150%
2−3
−150%

This is how GeForce MX130 and ATI Mobility HD 4550 compete in popular games:

  • GeForce MX130 is 80% faster in 1080p

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in Valorant, with 4K resolution and the High Preset, the GeForce MX130 is 1000% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

  • Without exception, GeForce MX130 surpassed ATI Mobility HD 4550 in all 29 of our tests.

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 4.33 0.35
Recency 17 November 2017 1 January 2010
Maximum RAM amount 2 GB 512 MB
Chip lithography 28 nm 55 nm

GeForce MX130 has a 1137.1% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 7 years, a 300% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 96.4% more advanced lithography process.

The GeForce MX130 is our recommended choice as it beats the Mobility Radeon HD 4550 in performance tests.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce MX130
GeForce MX130
ATI Mobility Radeon HD 4550
Mobility Radeon HD 4550

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.6 2408 votes

Rate GeForce MX130 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.6 37 votes

Rate Mobility Radeon HD 4550 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about GeForce MX130 or Mobility Radeon HD 4550, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.