ATI FirePro V5800 vs GeForce MX130

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared GeForce MX130 with FirePro V5800, including specs and performance data.

GeForce MX130
2017
2 GB GDDR5, 30 Watt
4.43
+28%

MX130 outperforms ATI V5800 by a significant 28% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking681749
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data0.44
Power efficiency10.613.36
ArchitectureMaxwell (2014−2017)TeraScale 2 (2009−2015)
GPU code nameGM108Juniper
Market segmentLaptopWorkstation
Release date17 November 2017 (7 years ago)26 April 2010 (15 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$479

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the performance-to-price ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices for comparison.

no data

Performance to price scatter graph

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores384800
Core clock speed1122 MHz690 MHz
Boost clock speed1242 MHzno data
Number of transistorsno data1,040 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm40 nm
Power consumption (TDP)30 Watt74 Watt
Texture fill rate29.8127.60
Floating-point processing power0.9539 TFLOPS1.104 TFLOPS
ROPs816
TMUs2440

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizemedium sizedno data
InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCIe 2.0 x16
Lengthno data229 mm
Widthno data1-slot
Supplementary power connectorsNoneNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount2 GB1 GB
Memory bus width64 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed1253 MHz1000 MHz
Memory bandwidth40.1 GB/s64 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputs1x DVI, 2x DisplayPort

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Optimus+-

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (11_0)11.2 (11_0)
Shader Model5.15.0
OpenGL4.64.4
OpenCL1.21.2
Vulkan1.1.126N/A
CUDA+-

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score.

GeForce MX130 4.43
+28%
ATI V5800 3.46

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

GeForce MX130 1813
+28.1%
ATI V5800 1415

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD18
+28.6%
14−16
−28.6%

Cost per frame, $

1080pno data34.21

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Counter-Strike 2 27
+28.6%
21−24
−28.6%
Cyberpunk 2077 4
+33.3%
3−4
−33.3%
Hogwarts Legacy 7
+40%
5−6
−40%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Battlefield 5 18−20
+28.6%
14−16
−28.6%
Counter-Strike 2 20
+42.9%
14−16
−42.9%
Cyberpunk 2077 9−10
+28.6%
7−8
−28.6%
Far Cry 5 14
+40%
10−11
−40%
Fortnite 32
+33.3%
24−27
−33.3%
Forza Horizon 4 21−24
+31.3%
16−18
−31.3%
Forza Horizon 5 15
+50%
10−11
−50%
Hogwarts Legacy 9−10
+28.6%
7−8
−28.6%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 23
+43.8%
16−18
−43.8%
Valorant 55−60
+42.5%
40−45
−42.5%

Full HD
High Preset

Battlefield 5 18−20
+28.6%
14−16
−28.6%
Counter-Strike 2 12
+33.3%
9−10
−33.3%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 75−80
+28.3%
60−65
−28.3%
Cyberpunk 2077 9−10
+28.6%
7−8
−28.6%
Dota 2 35
+29.6%
27−30
−29.6%
Far Cry 5 13
+30%
10−11
−30%
Fortnite 24
+33.3%
18−20
−33.3%
Forza Horizon 4 21−24
+31.3%
16−18
−31.3%
Forza Horizon 5 10−12
+37.5%
8−9
−37.5%
Grand Theft Auto V 15
+50%
10−11
−50%
Hogwarts Legacy 9−10
+28.6%
7−8
−28.6%
Metro Exodus 3
+50%
2−3
−50%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 21
+31.3%
16−18
−31.3%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 14
+40%
10−11
−40%
Valorant 55−60
+42.5%
40−45
−42.5%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 18−20
+28.6%
14−16
−28.6%
Cyberpunk 2077 9−10
+28.6%
7−8
−28.6%
Dota 2 28
+33.3%
21−24
−33.3%
Far Cry 5 12
+33.3%
9−10
−33.3%
Forza Horizon 4 21−24
+31.3%
16−18
−31.3%
Hogwarts Legacy 9−10
+28.6%
7−8
−28.6%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 14
+40%
10−11
−40%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 7
+40%
5−6
−40%
Valorant 55−60
+42.5%
40−45
−42.5%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Fortnite 16
+33.3%
12−14
−33.3%

1440p
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 7−8
+40%
5−6
−40%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 30−35
+37.5%
24−27
−37.5%
Grand Theft Auto V 5−6
+66.7%
3−4
−66.7%
Metro Exodus 3−4
+50%
2−3
−50%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 30−33
+42.9%
21−24
−42.9%
Valorant 45−50
+37.1%
35−40
−37.1%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 2−3
+100%
1−2
−100%
Cyberpunk 2077 3−4
+50%
2−3
−50%
Far Cry 5 7−8
+40%
5−6
−40%
Forza Horizon 4 10−11
+42.9%
7−8
−42.9%
Hogwarts Legacy 5−6
+66.7%
3−4
−66.7%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 6−7
+50%
4−5
−50%

1440p
Epic Preset

Fortnite 9−10
+28.6%
7−8
−28.6%

4K
High Preset

Grand Theft Auto V 16−18
+41.7%
12−14
−41.7%
Valorant 21−24
+37.5%
16−18
−37.5%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 1−2 0−1
Cyberpunk 2077 1−2 0−1
Dota 2 14−16
+50%
10−11
−50%
Far Cry 5 3−4
+50%
2−3
−50%
Forza Horizon 4 6−7
+50%
4−5
−50%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 5−6
+66.7%
3−4
−66.7%

4K
Epic Preset

Fortnite 5−6
+66.7%
3−4
−66.7%

This is how GeForce MX130 and ATI V5800 compete in popular games:

  • GeForce MX130 is 29% faster in 1080p

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 4.43 3.46
Recency 17 November 2017 26 April 2010
Maximum RAM amount 2 GB 1 GB
Chip lithography 28 nm 40 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 30 Watt 74 Watt

GeForce MX130 has a 28% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 7 years, a 100% higher maximum VRAM amount, a 42.9% more advanced lithography process, and 146.7% lower power consumption.

The GeForce MX130 is our recommended choice as it beats the FirePro V5800 in performance tests.

Be aware that GeForce MX130 is a notebook card while FirePro V5800 is a workstation one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce MX130
GeForce MX130
ATI FirePro V5800
FirePro V5800

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.6 2357 votes

Rate GeForce MX130 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.2 97 votes

Rate FirePro V5800 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about GeForce MX130 or FirePro V5800, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.