ATI Radeon X800 XT Platinum AGP vs GeForce MX110

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking778not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency8.63no data
ArchitectureMaxwell (2014−2017)R400 (2004−2008)
GPU code nameGM108SR420
Market segmentLaptopDesktop
Release date17 November 2017 (7 years ago)1 May 2004 (21 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores256no data
Core clock speed978 MHz520 MHz
Boost clock speed1006 MHzno data
Number of transistors1,020 million160 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm130 nm
Power consumption (TDP)30 Watt63 Watt
Texture fill rate16.108.320
Floating-point processing power0.5151 TFLOPSno data
ROPs816
TMUs1616
L1 Cache128 KBno data
L2 Cache1024 KBno data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 3.0 x4AGP 8x
Widthno data1-slot
Supplementary power connectorsNone1x Molex

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR3
Maximum RAM amount2 GB256 MB
Memory bus width64 Bit256 Bit
Memory clock speed1253 MHz560 MHz
Memory bandwidth40.1 GB/s35.84 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsPortable Device Dependent1x DVI, 1x VGA, 1x S-Video

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Optimus+-

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (11_0)9.0b (9_2)
Shader Model6.7 (5.1)no data
OpenGL4.62.1
OpenCL3.0N/A
Vulkan1.3N/A
CUDA+-

Pros & cons summary


Recency 17 November 2017 1 May 2004
Maximum RAM amount 2 GB 256 MB
Chip lithography 28 nm 130 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 30 Watt 63 Watt

GeForce MX110 has an age advantage of 13 years, a 700% higher maximum VRAM amount, a 364.3% more advanced lithography process, and 110% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between GeForce MX110 and Radeon X800 XT Platinum AGP. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that GeForce MX110 is a notebook graphics card while Radeon X800 XT Platinum AGP is a desktop one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce MX110
GeForce MX110
ATI Radeon X800 XT Platinum AGP
Radeon X800 XT Platinum AGP

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.2 2522 votes

Rate GeForce MX110 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate Radeon X800 XT Platinum AGP on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about GeForce MX110 or Radeon X800 XT Platinum AGP, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.