GMA 3000 vs GeForce MX110

VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking710not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency8.50no data
ArchitectureMaxwell (2014−2017)Generation 4.0 (2006−2007)
GPU code nameGM108SBroadwater
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
Release date17 November 2017 (7 years ago)1 June 2006 (18 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores256no data
Core clock speed978 MHz400 MHz
Boost clock speed1006 MHzno data
Number of transistors1,020 millionno data
Manufacturing process technology28 nm90 nm
Power consumption (TDP)30 Watt13 Watt
Texture fill rate16.101.600
Floating-point processing power0.5151 TFLOPSno data
ROPs84
TMUs164

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 3.0 x4PCIe 1.0 x16
Supplementary power connectorsNoneno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5System Shared
Maximum RAM amount2 GBSystem Shared
Memory bus width64 BitSystem Shared
Memory clock speed1253 MHzSystem Shared
Memory bandwidth40.1 GB/sno data
Shared memory-+

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsPortable Device DependentNo outputs

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Optimus+-

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (11_0)9.0c
Shader Model6.7 (5.1)3.0
OpenGL4.62.0
OpenCL3.0N/A
Vulkan1.3N/A
CUDA+-

Pros & cons summary


Recency 17 November 2017 1 June 2006
Chip lithography 28 nm 90 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 30 Watt 13 Watt

GeForce MX110 has an age advantage of 11 years, and a 221.4% more advanced lithography process.

GMA 3000, on the other hand, has 130.8% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between GeForce MX110 and GMA 3000. We've got no test results to judge.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce MX110
GeForce MX110
Intel GMA 3000
GMA 3000

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.3 2283 votes

Rate GeForce MX110 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.6 45 votes

Rate GMA 3000 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.