Arc Graphics 24EU vs GeForce MX110

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking783not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency8.65no data
ArchitectureMaxwell (2014−2017)Xe2-LPG (2024)
GPU code nameGM108SArrow Lake
Market segmentLaptopDesktop
Release date17 November 2017 (8 years ago)24 October 2024 (1 year ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores256192
Core clock speed978 MHz300 MHz
Boost clock speed1006 MHz2000 MHz
Number of transistors1,020 million17,800 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm3 nm
Power consumption (TDP)30 Watt65 Watt
Texture fill rate16.1024.00
Floating-point processing power0.5151 TFLOPS0.768 TFLOPS
ROPs86
TMUs1612
L1 Cache128 KBno data
L2 Cache1024 KBno data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 3.0 x4Ring Bus
Widthno dataIGP
Supplementary power connectorsNoneno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5System Shared
Maximum RAM amount2 GBSystem Shared
Memory bus width64 BitSystem Shared
Memory clock speed1253 MHzSystem Shared
Memory bandwidth40.1 GB/sno data
Shared memory-+

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsPortable Device DependentMotherboard Dependent

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Optimus+-

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (11_0)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model6.7 (5.1)6.8
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL3.03.0
Vulkan1.31.3
CUDA+-

Pros & cons summary


Recency 17 November 2017 24 October 2024
Chip lithography 28 nm 3 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 30 Watt 65 Watt

GeForce MX110 has 116.7% lower power consumption.

Arc Graphics 24EU, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 6 years, and a 833.3% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between GeForce MX110 and Arc Graphics 24EU. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that GeForce MX110 is a notebook graphics card while Arc Graphics 24EU is a desktop one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce MX110
GeForce MX110
Intel Arc Graphics 24EU
Arc Graphics 24EU

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.2 2593 votes

Rate GeForce MX110 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate Arc Graphics 24EU on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about GeForce MX110 or Arc Graphics 24EU, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.