RTX 6000 Ada Generation vs GeForce Go 7950 GTX

VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared GeForce Go 7950 GTX with RTX 6000 Ada Generation, including specs and performance data.

Go 7950 GTX
2006
512 MB GDDR3, 45 Watt
0.68

RTX 6000 Ada Generation outperforms Go 7950 GTX by a whopping 10891% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking117815
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data7.14
Power efficiency1.0417.08
ArchitectureCurie (2003−2013)Ada Lovelace (2022−2024)
GPU code nameG71AD102
Market segmentLaptopWorkstation
Release date12 October 2006 (18 years ago)3 December 2022 (2 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$6,799

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores3218176
Core clock speed575 MHz915 MHz
Boost clock speed575 MHz2505 MHz
Number of transistors278 million76,300 million
Manufacturing process technology90 nm5 nm
Power consumption (TDP)45 Watt300 Watt
Texture fill rate13.801,423
Floating-point processing powerno data91.06 TFLOPS
ROPs16192
TMUs24568
Tensor Coresno data568
Ray Tracing Coresno data142

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizelargeno data
InterfaceMXM-IIIPCIe 4.0 x16
Lengthno data267 mm
Widthno data2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsNone1x 16-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR3GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount512 MB48 GB
Memory bus width256 Bit384 Bit
Memory clock speed700 MHz2500 MHz
Memory bandwidth44.8 GB/s960.0 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputs4x DisplayPort 1.4a

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX9.0c (9_3)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model3.06.8
OpenGL2.14.6
OpenCLN/A3.0
VulkanN/A1.3
CUDA-8.9

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Go 7950 GTX 0.68
RTX 6000 Ada Generation 74.74
+10891%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Go 7950 GTX 263
RTX 6000 Ada Generation 28801
+10851%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD1−2
−18000%
181
+18000%
1440p1−2
−16900%
170
+16900%
4K1−2
−11700%
118
+11700%

Cost per frame, $

1080pno data37.56
1440pno data39.99
4Kno data57.62

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 3−4
−9900%
300−310
+9900%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 4−5
−3650%
150−160
+3650%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 3−4
−3900%
120−130
+3900%
Cyberpunk 2077 3−4
−9900%
300−310
+9900%
Far Cry New Dawn 1−2
−17900%
180−190
+17900%
Hitman 3 5−6
−2480%
120−130
+2480%
Horizon Zero Dawn 10−12
−2300%
260−270
+2300%
Red Dead Redemption 2 0−1 120−130
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 6−7
−5100%
300−350
+5100%
Watch Dogs: Legion 30−33
−410%
150−160
+410%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 4−5
−3650%
150−160
+3650%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 3−4
−3900%
120−130
+3900%
Cyberpunk 2077 3−4
−9900%
300−310
+9900%
Far Cry New Dawn 1−2
−17900%
180−190
+17900%
Hitman 3 5−6
−2480%
120−130
+2480%
Horizon Zero Dawn 10−12
−2300%
260−270
+2300%
Red Dead Redemption 2 0−1 120−130
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 6−7
−5100%
300−350
+5100%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 10−11
−1490%
150−160
+1490%
Watch Dogs: Legion 30−33
−410%
150−160
+410%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 4−5
−3650%
150−160
+3650%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 3−4
−3900%
120−130
+3900%
Cyberpunk 2077 3−4
−9900%
300−310
+9900%
Hitman 3 5−6
−2480%
120−130
+2480%
Horizon Zero Dawn 10−12
−2300%
260−270
+2300%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 6−7
−5100%
300−350
+5100%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 10−11
−2500%
260
+2500%
Watch Dogs: Legion 30−33
−410%
150−160
+410%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 0−1 120−130

1440p
High Preset

Far Cry New Dawn 1−2
−11100%
110−120
+11100%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 0−1 85−90
Cyberpunk 2077 1−2
−9900%
100−105
+9900%
Far Cry 5 1−2
−8300%
80−85
+8300%
Hitman 3 6−7
−1683%
100−110
+1683%
Horizon Zero Dawn 3−4
−6200%
180−190
+6200%
Watch Dogs: Legion 2−3
−11900%
240−250
+11900%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 3−4
−3833%
110−120
+3833%

4K
High Preset

Far Cry New Dawn 0−1 65−70

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 1−2
−6000%
60−65
+6000%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 0−1 55−60

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 2−3
−4000%
80−85
+4000%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Valhalla 130−140
+0%
130−140
+0%
Battlefield 5 230−240
+0%
230−240
+0%
Far Cry 5 110−120
+0%
110−120
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 240−250
+0%
240−250
+0%
Metro Exodus 150−160
+0%
150−160
+0%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Valhalla 130−140
+0%
130−140
+0%
Battlefield 5 230−240
+0%
230−240
+0%
Far Cry 5 110−120
+0%
110−120
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 240−250
+0%
240−250
+0%
Metro Exodus 150−160
+0%
150−160
+0%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Valhalla 130−140
+0%
130−140
+0%
Far Cry 5 110−120
+0%
110−120
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 240−250
+0%
240−250
+0%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5 160−170
+0%
160−170
+0%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Valhalla 90−95
+0%
90−95
+0%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 80−85
+0%
80−85
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 270−280
+0%
270−280
+0%
Metro Exodus 99
+0%
99
+0%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 210−220
+0%
210−220
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 219
+0%
219
+0%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5 85−90
+0%
85−90
+0%
Hitman 3 65−70
+0%
65−70
+0%
Horizon Zero Dawn 87
+0%
87
+0%
Metro Exodus 110−120
+0%
110−120
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 184
+0%
184
+0%

4K
Ultra Preset

Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 50−55
+0%
50−55
+0%
Far Cry 5 50−55
+0%
50−55
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 130−140
+0%
130−140
+0%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 110−120
+0%
110−120
+0%
Watch Dogs: Legion 45−50
+0%
45−50
+0%

This is how Go 7950 GTX and RTX 6000 Ada Generation compete in popular games:

  • RTX 6000 Ada Generation is 18000% faster in 1080p
  • RTX 6000 Ada Generation is 16900% faster in 1440p
  • RTX 6000 Ada Generation is 11700% faster in 4K

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in Far Cry New Dawn, with 1080p resolution and the Medium Preset, the RTX 6000 Ada Generation is 17900% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

  • RTX 6000 Ada Generation is ahead in 30 tests (50%)
  • there's a draw in 30 tests (50%)

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.68 74.74
Recency 12 October 2006 3 December 2022
Maximum RAM amount 512 MB 48 GB
Chip lithography 90 nm 5 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 45 Watt 300 Watt

Go 7950 GTX has 566.7% lower power consumption.

RTX 6000 Ada Generation, on the other hand, has a 10891.2% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 16 years, a 9500% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 1700% more advanced lithography process.

The RTX 6000 Ada Generation is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce Go 7950 GTX in performance tests.

Be aware that GeForce Go 7950 GTX is a notebook card while RTX 6000 Ada Generation is a workstation one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce Go 7950 GTX
GeForce Go 7950 GTX
NVIDIA RTX 6000 Ada Generation
RTX 6000 Ada Generation

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


2.3 3 votes

Rate GeForce Go 7950 GTX on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.4 84 votes

Rate RTX 6000 Ada Generation on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.