GeForce MX570 vs Go 7950 GTX

Go 7900 GS Go 7900 GS SLI Go 7900 GTX Go 7900 GTX SLI Go 7900 SE Go 7950 GTX Go 7950 GTX SLI
VS
MX570 MX570 A RTX 2050 Max-Q RTX 2050 Mobile RTX 3050 Max-Q RTX 3050 Max-Q Refresh 4 GB RTX 3050 Max-Q Refresh 6 GB RTX 3050 Mobile RTX 3050 Mobile Refresh RTX 3050 Mobile Refresh 4 GB RTX 3050 Mobile Refresh 6 GB RTX 3050 Ti Max-Q

Aggregate performance score

We've compared GeForce Go 7950 GTX and GeForce MX570, covering specs and all relevant benchmarks.

Go 7950 GTX
2006
512 MB GDDR3, 45 Watt
0.68

MX570 outperforms Go 7950 GTX by a whopping 2085% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Contents

Go 7950 GTX Go 7950 GTX
GeForce MX570 GeForce MX570

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1189363
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency1.0440.75
ArchitectureCurie (2003−2013)Ampere (2020−2024)
GPU code nameG71GA107
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
Release date12 October 2006 (18 years ago)May 2022 (2 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores322048
Core clock speed575 MHz832 MHz
Boost clock speed575 MHz1155 MHz
Number of transistors278 millionno data
Manufacturing process technology90 nm8 nm
Power consumption (TDP)45 Watt25 Watt
Texture fill rate13.8073.92
Floating-point processing powerno data4.731 TFLOPS
ROPs1640
TMUs2464
Tensor Coresno data64
Ray Tracing Coresno data16

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizelargeno data
InterfaceMXM-IIIPCIe 4.0 x8
Supplementary power connectorsNoneNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR3GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount512 MB2 GB
Memory bus width256 Bit64 Bit
Memory clock speed700 MHz1500 MHz
Memory bandwidth44.8 GB/s96 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsNo outputs

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Optimus-+

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX9.0c (9_3)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model3.06.6
OpenGL2.14.6
OpenCLN/A3.0
VulkanN/A1.3
CUDA-8.6
DLSS-+

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score.

Go 7950 GTX 0.68
GeForce MX570 14.86
+2085%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Go 7950 GTX 263
GeForce MX570 5712
+2072%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD1−2
−3700%
38
+3700%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Atomic Heart 2−3
−1650%
35−40
+1650%
Counter-Strike 2 7−8
−257%
24−27
+257%
Cyberpunk 2077 2−3
−1350%
27−30
+1350%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Atomic Heart 2−3
−1650%
35−40
+1650%
Counter-Strike 2 7−8
−257%
24−27
+257%
Cyberpunk 2077 2−3
−1350%
27−30
+1350%
Forza Horizon 4 4−5
−1350%
55−60
+1350%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 8−9
−538%
50−55
+538%
Valorant 27−30
−303%
110−120
+303%

Full HD
High Preset

Atomic Heart 2−3
−1650%
35−40
+1650%
Counter-Strike 2 7−8
−257%
24−27
+257%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 18−20
−900%
190−200
+900%
Cyberpunk 2077 2−3
−1350%
27−30
+1350%
Dota 2 12−14
−642%
85−90
+642%
Forza Horizon 4 4−5
−1350%
55−60
+1350%
Metro Exodus 0−1 27−30
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 8−9
−538%
50−55
+538%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 5−6
−640%
35−40
+640%
Valorant 27−30
−303%
110−120
+303%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Counter-Strike 2 7−8
−257%
24−27
+257%
Cyberpunk 2077 2−3
−1350%
27−30
+1350%
Dota 2 12−14
−642%
85−90
+642%
Forza Horizon 4 4−5
−1350%
55−60
+1350%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 8−9
−538%
50−55
+538%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 5−6
−580%
34
+580%
Valorant 27−30
−303%
110−120
+303%

1440p
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 0−1 0−1
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 2−3
−5100%
100−110
+5100%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 4−5
−3100%
120−130
+3100%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 0−1 12−14
Forza Horizon 4 2−3
−1600%
30−35
+1600%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 1−2
−2100%
21−24
+2100%

1440p
Epic Preset

Fortnite 1−2
−3000%
30−35
+3000%

4K
High Preset

Atomic Heart 0−1 10−12
Grand Theft Auto V 14−16
−73.3%
24−27
+73.3%
Valorant 4−5
−1800%
75−80
+1800%

4K
Ultra Preset

Far Cry 5 1−2
−1400%
14−16
+1400%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 2−3
−550%
12−14
+550%

4K
Epic Preset

Fortnite 2−3
−550%
12−14
+550%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Battlefield 5 60−65
+0%
60−65
+0%
Far Cry 5 45−50
+0%
45−50
+0%
Fortnite 75−80
+0%
75−80
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 35−40
+0%
35−40
+0%

Full HD
High Preset

Battlefield 5 60−65
+0%
60−65
+0%
Far Cry 5 45−50
+0%
45−50
+0%
Fortnite 75−80
+0%
75−80
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 35−40
+0%
35−40
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 54
+0%
54
+0%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 60−65
+0%
60−65
+0%
Far Cry 5 45−50
+0%
45−50
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 35−40
+0%
35−40
+0%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Fortnite 75−80
+0%
75−80
+0%

1440p
High Preset

Grand Theft Auto V 21−24
+0%
21−24
+0%
Metro Exodus 16−18
+0%
16−18
+0%
Valorant 140−150
+0%
140−150
+0%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 35−40
+0%
35−40
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 16−18
+0%
16−18
+0%
Far Cry 5 30−33
+0%
30−33
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 24−27
+0%
24−27
+0%

4K
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 6−7
+0%
6−7
+0%
Metro Exodus 10−11
+0%
10−11
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 18−20
+0%
18−20
+0%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 20−22
+0%
20−22
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 6−7
+0%
6−7
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 5−6
+0%
5−6
+0%
Dota 2 50−55
+0%
50−55
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 24−27
+0%
24−27
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 12−14
+0%
12−14
+0%

This is how Go 7950 GTX and GeForce MX570 compete in popular games:

  • GeForce MX570 is 3700% faster in 1080p

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive, with 1440p resolution and the High Preset, the GeForce MX570 is 5100% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

  • GeForce MX570 is ahead in 35 tests (55%)
  • there's a draw in 29 tests (45%)

Pros & cons summary

Performance score 0.68 14.86
Maximum RAM amount 512 MB 2 GB
Chip lithography 90 nm 8 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 45 Watt 25 Watt

GeForce MX570 has a 2085.3% higher aggregate performance score, a 300% higher maximum VRAM amount, a 1025% more advanced lithography process, and 80% lower power consumption.

The GeForce MX570 is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce Go 7950 GTX in performance tests.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.

NVIDIA GeForce Go 7950 GTX
GeForce Go 7950 GTX
NVIDIA GeForce MX570
GeForce MX570
Like
Like

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Go 7950 GTX GeForce Go 7950 GTX
vs
HD 8330E Radeon HD 8330E
GeForce MX570 GeForce MX570
vs
Radeon 760M Radeon 760M
Go 7950 GTX GeForce Go 7950 GTX
vs
HD 6450A Radeon HD 6450A
GT 240M GeForce GT 240M
vs
8600 GT GeForce 8600 GT
GT 240M GeForce GT 240M
vs
GeForce 6800 GeForce 6800
GT 240M GeForce GT 240M
vs
FX 5200 GeForce FX 5200
GT 240M GeForce GT 240M
vs
UHD Graphics UHD Graphics
GT 240M GeForce GT 240M
vs
RTX 3060 Ti GeForce RTX 3060 Ti
9700M GT GeForce 9700M GT
vs
HD 7340 Radeon HD 7340
9700M GT GeForce 9700M GT
vs
Go 7900 GTX GeForce Go 7900 GTX
9700M GT GeForce 9700M GT
vs
9650M GS GeForce 9650M GS
9700M GT GeForce 9700M GT
vs
GT 320M GeForce GT 320M
9700M GT GeForce 9700M GT
vs
Go 7600 GT GeForce Go 7600 GT

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.

2.3 3 votes

Rate GeForce Go 7950 GTX on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.7 94 votes

Rate GeForce MX570 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can give us your opinion about GeForce Go 7950 GTX or GeForce MX570, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.