Arc A530M vs GeForce Go 7900 GTX

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared GeForce Go 7900 GTX and Arc A530M, covering specs and all relevant benchmarks.

Go 7900 GTX
2006
512 MB GDDR3, 45 Watt
0.64

A530M outperforms Go 7900 GTX by a whopping 2852% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1239319
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency1.1022.51
ArchitectureCurie (2003−2013)Generation 12.7 (2022−2023)
GPU code nameG71DG2-256
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
Release date18 April 2006 (19 years ago)1 August 2023 (2 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores321536
Core clock speed500 MHz900 MHz
Boost clock speed500 MHz1300 MHz
Number of transistors278 million11,500 million
Manufacturing process technology90 nm6 nm
Power consumption (TDP)45 Watt65 Watt
Texture fill rate12.00124.8
Floating-point processing powerno data3.994 TFLOPS
ROPs1648
TMUs2496
Tensor Coresno data192
Ray Tracing Coresno data12
L2 Cacheno data8 MB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizelargeno data
InterfacePCIe 1.0 x16PCIe 4.0 x8
Supplementary power connectorsNoneno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR3GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount512 MB8 GB
Memory bus width256 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed600 MHz1750 MHz
Memory bandwidth38.4 GB/s224.0 GB/s
Shared memory--
Resizable BAR-+

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsPortable Device Dependent

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX9.0c (9_3)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model3.06.6
OpenGL2.14.6
OpenCLN/A3.0
VulkanN/A1.3
DLSS-+

Synthetic benchmarks

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score.

Go 7900 GTX 0.64
Arc A530M 18.89
+2852%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Go 7900 GTX 270
Samples: 2
Arc A530M 7993
+2860%
Samples: 38

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low

Cyberpunk 2077 2−3
−1950%
40−45
+1950%
Hogwarts Legacy 5−6
−660%
35−40
+660%

Full HD
Medium

Cyberpunk 2077 2−3
−1950%
40−45
+1950%
Far Cry 5 0−1 60−65
Forza Horizon 4 5−6
−1480%
75−80
+1480%
Hogwarts Legacy 5−6
−660%
35−40
+660%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 8−9
−825%
70−75
+825%
Valorant 27−30
−421%
140−150
+421%

Full HD
High

Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 18−20
−1126%
230−240
+1126%
Cyberpunk 2077 2−3
−1950%
40−45
+1950%
Dota 2 12−14
−2817%
350−400
+2817%
Far Cry 5 0−1 60−65
Forza Horizon 4 5−6
−1480%
75−80
+1480%
Hogwarts Legacy 5−6
−660%
35−40
+660%
Metro Exodus 1−2
−4100%
40−45
+4100%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 8−9
−825%
70−75
+825%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 5−6
−1000%
55−60
+1000%
Valorant 27−30
−421%
140−150
+421%

Full HD
Ultra

Cyberpunk 2077 2−3
−1950%
40−45
+1950%
Dota 2 12−14
−2817%
350−400
+2817%
Far Cry 5 0−1 60−65
Forza Horizon 4 5−6
−1480%
75−80
+1480%
Hogwarts Legacy 5−6
−660%
35−40
+660%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 8−9
−825%
70−75
+825%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 5−6
−1000%
55−60
+1000%
Valorant 27−30
−421%
140−150
+421%

1440p
High

Counter-Strike 2 3−4
−1233%
40−45
+1233%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 3−4
−4600%
140−150
+4600%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 7−8
−2343%
170−180
+2343%

1440p
Ultra

Forza Horizon 4 2−3
−2300%
45−50
+2300%
Hogwarts Legacy 0−1 21−24
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 1−2
−2900%
30−33
+2900%

1440p
Epic

Fortnite 1−2
−4400%
45−50
+4400%

4K
High

Grand Theft Auto V 14−16
−157%
35−40
+157%
Valorant 3−4
−3600%
110−120
+3600%

4K
Ultra

PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 2−3
−900%
20−22
+900%

4K
Epic

Fortnite 2−3
−900%
20−22
+900%

Full HD
Low

Counter-Strike 2 110−120
+0%
110−120
+0%

Full HD
Medium

Battlefield 5 80−85
+0%
80−85
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 110−120
+0%
110−120
+0%
Fortnite 100−110
+0%
100−110
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 60−65
+0%
60−65
+0%

Full HD
High

Battlefield 5 80−85
+0%
80−85
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 110−120
+0%
110−120
+0%
Fortnite 100−110
+0%
100−110
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 60−65
+0%
60−65
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 70−75
+0%
70−75
+0%

Full HD
Ultra

Battlefield 5 80−85
+0%
80−85
+0%

Full HD
Epic

Fortnite 100−110
+0%
100−110
+0%

1440p
High

Grand Theft Auto V 30−35
+0%
30−35
+0%
Metro Exodus 24−27
+0%
24−27
+0%
Valorant 180−190
+0%
180−190
+0%

1440p
Ultra

Battlefield 5 55−60
+0%
55−60
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 18−20
+0%
18−20
+0%
Far Cry 5 40−45
+0%
40−45
+0%

4K
High

Counter-Strike 2 16−18
+0%
16−18
+0%
Hogwarts Legacy 12−14
+0%
12−14
+0%
Metro Exodus 16−18
+0%
16−18
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 27−30
+0%
27−30
+0%

4K
Ultra

Battlefield 5 30−33
+0%
30−33
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 16−18
+0%
16−18
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 8−9
+0%
8−9
+0%
Far Cry 5 21−24
+0%
21−24
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 30−35
+0%
30−35
+0%
Hogwarts Legacy 12−14
+0%
12−14
+0%

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive, with 1440p resolution and the High Preset, the Arc A530M is 4600% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

  • Arc A530M performs better in 31 tests (53%)
  • there's a draw in 28 tests (47%)

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.64 18.89
Recency 18 April 2006 1 August 2023
Maximum RAM amount 512 MB 8 GB
Chip lithography 90 nm 6 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 45 Watt 65 Watt

Go 7900 GTX has 44.4% lower power consumption.

Arc A530M, on the other hand, has a 2851.6% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 17 years, a 1500% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 1400% more advanced lithography process.

The Arc A530M is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce Go 7900 GTX in performance tests.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce Go 7900 GTX
GeForce Go 7900 GTX
Intel Arc A530M
Arc A530M

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4 2 votes

Rate GeForce Go 7900 GTX on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.8 217 votes

Rate Arc A530M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about GeForce Go 7900 GTX or Arc A530M, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.