UHD Graphics 710 vs GeForce Go 7800 GTX
Aggregate performance score
We've compared GeForce Go 7800 GTX with UHD Graphics 710, including specs and performance data.
Graphics 710 outperforms Go 7800 GTX by a whopping 431% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Contents
Primary details
GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.
| Place in the ranking | 1289 | 853 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Power efficiency | 0.58 | 13.42 |
| Architecture | Curie (2003−2013) | Generation 12.2 (2022−2023) |
| GPU code name | G70 | Alder Lake GT1 |
| Market segment | Laptop | Desktop |
| Release date | 29 September 2005 (20 years ago) | 4 January 2022 (3 years ago) |
Detailed specifications
General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.
| Pipelines / CUDA cores | 32 | 128 |
| Core clock speed | 440 MHz | 300 MHz |
| Boost clock speed | 440 MHz | 1300 MHz |
| Number of transistors | 302 million | no data |
| Manufacturing process technology | 110 nm | 10 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 65 Watt | 15 Watt |
| Texture fill rate | 10.56 | 10.40 |
| Floating-point processing power | no data | 0.3328 TFLOPS |
| ROPs | 24 | 8 |
| TMUs | 24 | 8 |
Form factor & compatibility
Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).
| Laptop size | large | no data |
| Interface | PCIe 1.0 x16 | Ring Bus |
| Width | no data | IGP |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | no data |
VRAM capacity and type
Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.
| Memory type | GDDR3 | System Shared |
| Maximum RAM amount | 512 MB | System Shared |
| Memory bus width | 256 Bit | System Shared |
| Memory clock speed | 550 MHz | System Shared |
| Memory bandwidth | 35.2 GB/s | no data |
| Shared memory | - | + |
Connectivity and outputs
This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.
| Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
API and SDK support
List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.
| DirectX | 9.0c (9_3) | 12 (12_1) |
| Shader Model | 3.0 | 6.4 |
| OpenGL | 2.1 | 4.6 |
| OpenCL | N/A | 3.0 |
| Vulkan | N/A | 1.3 |
Synthetic benchmarks
Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.
Combined synthetic benchmark score
This is our combined benchmark score.
Passmark
This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.
Gaming performance
Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.
FPS performance in popular games
Full HD
Low
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 1−2
−400%
|
5−6
+400%
|
| Hogwarts Legacy | 5−6
−380%
|
24−27
+380%
|
Full HD
Medium
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 1−2
−400%
|
5−6
+400%
|
| Forza Horizon 4 | 4−5
−425%
|
21−24
+425%
|
| Hogwarts Legacy | 5−6
−380%
|
24−27
+380%
|
| PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 8−9
−400%
|
40−45
+400%
|
| Valorant | 27−30
−419%
|
140−150
+419%
|
Full HD
High
| Counter-Strike: Global Offensive | 16−18
−429%
|
90−95
+429%
|
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 1−2
−400%
|
5−6
+400%
|
| Dota 2 | 10−12
−400%
|
55−60
+400%
|
| Forza Horizon 4 | 4−5
−425%
|
21−24
+425%
|
| Hogwarts Legacy | 5−6
−380%
|
24−27
+380%
|
| Metro Exodus | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 8−9
−400%
|
40−45
+400%
|
| The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 5−6
−380%
|
24−27
+380%
|
| Valorant | 27−30
−419%
|
140−150
+419%
|
Full HD
Ultra
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 1−2
−400%
|
5−6
+400%
|
| Dota 2 | 10−12
−400%
|
55−60
+400%
|
| Forza Horizon 4 | 4−5
−425%
|
21−24
+425%
|
| Hogwarts Legacy | 5−6
−380%
|
24−27
+380%
|
| PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 8−9
−400%
|
40−45
+400%
|
| The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 5−6
−380%
|
24−27
+380%
|
| Valorant | 27−30
−419%
|
140−150
+419%
|
1440p
High
| Counter-Strike 2 | 3−4
−367%
|
14−16
+367%
|
| Counter-Strike: Global Offensive | 2−3
−400%
|
10−11
+400%
|
| PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 5−6
−380%
|
24−27
+380%
|
1440p
Ultra
| Forza Horizon 4 | 2−3
−400%
|
10−11
+400%
|
| Hogwarts Legacy | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 1−2
−400%
|
5−6
+400%
|
1440p
Epic
| Fortnite | 0−1 | 0−1 |
4K
High
| Grand Theft Auto V | 14−16
−400%
|
70−75
+400%
|
| Valorant | 3−4
−367%
|
14−16
+367%
|
4K
Ultra
| PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 2−3
−400%
|
10−11
+400%
|
4K
Epic
| Fortnite | 2−3
−400%
|
10−11
+400%
|
Pros & cons summary
| Performance score | 0.49 | 2.60 |
| Recency | 29 September 2005 | 4 January 2022 |
| Chip lithography | 110 nm | 10 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 65 Watt | 15 Watt |
UHD Graphics 710 has a 430.6% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 16 years, a 1000% more advanced lithography process, and 333.3% lower power consumption.
The UHD Graphics 710 is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce Go 7800 GTX in performance tests.
Be aware that GeForce Go 7800 GTX is a notebook graphics card while UHD Graphics 710 is a desktop one.
Other comparisons
We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.
