ATI Radeon X1650 PRO vs GeForce Go 7800 GTX
Aggregate performance score
We've compared GeForce Go 7800 GTX with Radeon X1650 PRO, including specs and performance data.
Go 7800 GTX outperforms X1650 PRO by a whopping 150% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Contents
Primary details
GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.
| Place in the ranking | 1297 | 1452 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Power efficiency | 0.59 | 0.35 |
| Architecture | Curie (2003−2013) | Ultra-Threaded SE (2005−2007) |
| GPU code name | G70 | RV530 |
| Market segment | Laptop | Desktop |
| Release date | 29 September 2005 (20 years ago) | 1 February 2007 (19 years ago) |
Detailed specifications
General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.
| Pipelines / CUDA cores | 32 | no data |
| Core clock speed | 440 MHz | 600 MHz |
| Boost clock speed | 440 MHz | no data |
| Number of transistors | 302 million | 157 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 110 nm | 90 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 65 Watt | 44 Watt |
| Texture fill rate | 10.56 | 2.400 |
| ROPs | 24 | 4 |
| TMUs | 24 | 4 |
Form factor & compatibility
Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).
| Laptop size | large | no data |
| Interface | PCIe 1.0 x16 | PCIe 1.0 x16 |
| Width | no data | 1-slot |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | None |
VRAM capacity and type
Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.
| Memory type | GDDR3 | GDDR3 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 512 MB | 256 MB |
| Memory bus width | 256 Bit | 128 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 550 MHz | 700 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 35.2 GB/s | 22.4 GB/s |
| Shared memory | - | - |
Connectivity and outputs
This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.
| Display Connectors | No outputs | 1x DVI, 1x VGA, 1x S-Video |
API and SDK support
List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.
| DirectX | 9.0c (9_3) | 9.0c (9_3) |
| Shader Model | 3.0 | 3.0 |
| OpenGL | 2.1 | 2.1 |
| OpenCL | N/A | N/A |
| Vulkan | N/A | N/A |
Synthetic benchmarks
Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.
Combined synthetic benchmark score
This is our combined benchmark score.
Passmark
This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.
Gaming performance
Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.
FPS performance in popular games
Full HD
Low
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 1−2 | 0−1 |
Full HD
Medium
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 1−2 | 0−1 |
| Forza Horizon 4 | 4−5
+300%
|
1−2
−300%
|
| PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 8−9
+167%
|
3−4
−167%
|
| Valorant | 27−30
+170%
|
10−11
−170%
|
Full HD
High
| Counter-Strike: Global Offensive | 16−18
+183%
|
6−7
−183%
|
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 1−2 | 0−1 |
| Dota 2 | 10−12
+175%
|
4−5
−175%
|
| Forza Horizon 4 | 4−5
+300%
|
1−2
−300%
|
| Metro Exodus | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 8−9
+167%
|
3−4
−167%
|
| The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 5−6
+150%
|
2−3
−150%
|
| Valorant | 27−30
+170%
|
10−11
−170%
|
Full HD
Ultra
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 1−2 | 0−1 |
| Dota 2 | 10−12
+175%
|
4−5
−175%
|
| Forza Horizon 4 | 4−5
+300%
|
1−2
−300%
|
| PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 8−9
+167%
|
3−4
−167%
|
| The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 5−6
+150%
|
2−3
−150%
|
| Valorant | 27−30
+170%
|
10−11
−170%
|
1440p
High
| Counter-Strike 2 | 3−4
+200%
|
1−2
−200%
|
| Counter-Strike: Global Offensive | 2−3 | 0−1 |
| PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 5−6
+150%
|
2−3
−150%
|
1440p
Ultra
| Forza Horizon 4 | 2−3 | 0−1 |
| The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 1−2 | 0−1 |
1440p
Epic
| Fortnite | 0−1 | 0−1 |
4K
High
| Grand Theft Auto V | 14−16
+180%
|
5−6
−180%
|
| Valorant | 2−3 | 0−1 |
4K
Ultra
| PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 2−3 | 0−1 |
4K
Epic
| Fortnite | 2−3 | 0−1 |
Pros & cons summary
| Performance score | 0.50 | 0.20 |
| Recency | 29 September 2005 | 1 February 2007 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 512 MB | 256 MB |
| Chip lithography | 110 nm | 90 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 65 Watt | 44 Watt |
Go 7800 GTX has a 150% higher aggregate performance score, and a 100% higher maximum VRAM amount.
ATI X1650 PRO, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 1 year, a 22% more advanced lithography process, and 48% lower power consumption.
The GeForce Go 7800 GTX is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon X1650 PRO in performance tests.
Be aware that GeForce Go 7800 GTX is a notebook graphics card while Radeon X1650 PRO is a desktop one.
Other comparisons
We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.
