RTX A2000 vs GeForce Go 7800 GTX

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
7200 7300 7300T 7400 7400T 7450 7600 7600 GT 7700 7800 7800 GTX 7800 GTX SLI 7900 GS 7900 GS SLI 7900 GTX 7900 GTX SLI 7900 SE 7950 GTX 7950 GTX MXM-IV 7950 GTX SLI
VS
#ad 
Buy on Amazon
A1000 A2000 A2000 12 GB A4000 A4000H A4500 A5000 A5000-8Q A5000-12Q A5500

Aggregate performance score

We've compared GeForce Go 7800 GTX with RTX A2000, including specs and performance data.

Go 7800 GTX
2005
512 MB GDDR3, 65 Watt
0.50

RTX A2000 outperforms Go 7800 GTX by a whopping 6342% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Contents

Share:
Go 7800 GTX Go 7800 GTX
RTX A2000 RTX A2000

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1291186
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data33.14
Power efficiency0.5935.34
ArchitectureCurie (2003−2013)Ampere (2020−2025)
GPU code nameG70GA106
Market segmentLaptopWorkstation
Release date29 September 2005 (20 years ago)10 August 2021 (4 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$449

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices.

no data

Performance to price scatter graph

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores323328
Core clock speed440 MHz562 MHz
Boost clock speed440 MHz1200 MHz
Number of transistors302 million12,000 million
Manufacturing process technology110 nm8 nm
Power consumption (TDP)65 Watt70 Watt
Texture fill rate10.56124.8
Floating-point processing powerno data7.987 TFLOPS
ROPs2448
TMUs24104
Tensor Coresno data104
Ray Tracing Coresno data26
L1 Cacheno data3.3 MB
L2 Cacheno data3 MB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizelargeno data
InterfacePCIe 1.0 x16PCIe 4.0 x16
Lengthno data167 mm
Widthno data2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsNoneNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR3GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount512 MB6 GB
Memory bus width256 Bit192 Bit
Memory clock speed550 MHz1500 MHz
Memory bandwidth35.2 GB/s288.0 GB/s
Shared memory--
Resizable BAR-+

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputs4x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX9.0c (9_3)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model3.06.8
OpenGL2.14.6
OpenCLN/A3.0
VulkanN/A1.3
CUDA-8.6
DLSS-+

Synthetic benchmarks

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score.

Go 7800 GTX 0.50
RTX A2000 32.21
+6342%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Go 7800 GTX 209
Samples: 8
RTX A2000 13469
+6344%
Samples: 946

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD1−2
−8900%
90
+8900%
1440p0−143
4K-0−127

Cost per frame, $

1080pno data4.99
1440pno data10.44
4Kno data16.63

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low

Cyberpunk 2077 1−2
−7300%
70−75
+7300%

Full HD
Medium

Cyberpunk 2077 1−2
−7300%
70−75
+7300%
Forza Horizon 4 4−5
−3075%
120−130
+3075%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 8−9
−1538%
130−140
+1538%
Valorant 27−30
−644%
200−210
+644%

Full HD
High

Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 16−18
−1529%
270−280
+1529%
Cyberpunk 2077 1−2
−7300%
70−75
+7300%
Dota 2 10−12
−6264%
700−750
+6264%
Forza Horizon 4 4−5
−3075%
120−130
+3075%
Metro Exodus 0−1 60
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 8−9
−1538%
130−140
+1538%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 5−6
−2240%
117
+2240%
Valorant 27−30
−644%
200−210
+644%

Full HD
Ultra

Cyberpunk 2077 1−2
−7300%
70−75
+7300%
Dota 2 10−12
−6264%
700−750
+6264%
Forza Horizon 4 4−5
−3075%
120−130
+3075%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 8−9
−1538%
130−140
+1538%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 5−6
−1180%
64
+1180%
Valorant 27−30
−644%
200−210
+644%

1440p
High

Counter-Strike 2 3−4
−2467%
75−80
+2467%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 2−3
−11300%
220−230
+11300%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 5−6
−3400%
170−180
+3400%

1440p
Ultra

Escape from Tarkov 2−3
−3750%
75−80
+3750%
Forza Horizon 4 2−3
−4350%
85−90
+4350%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 1−2
−4600%
47
+4600%

1440p
Epic

Fortnite 0−1 80−85

4K
High

Grand Theft Auto V 14−16
−300%
56
+300%
Valorant 3−4
−6500%
190−200
+6500%

4K
Ultra

PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 2−3
−1900%
40−45
+1900%

4K
Epic

Fortnite 2−3
−1900%
40−45
+1900%

Full HD
Low

Counter-Strike 2 180−190
+0%
180−190
+0%

Full HD
Medium

Battlefield 5 110−120
+0%
110−120
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 180−190
+0%
180−190
+0%
Escape from Tarkov 110−120
+0%
110−120
+0%
Far Cry 5 108
+0%
108
+0%
Fortnite 140−150
+0%
140−150
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 121
+0%
121
+0%

Full HD
High

Battlefield 5 110−120
+0%
110−120
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 180−190
+0%
180−190
+0%
Escape from Tarkov 110−120
+0%
110−120
+0%
Far Cry 5 98
+0%
98
+0%
Fortnite 140−150
+0%
140−150
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 106
+0%
106
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 129
+0%
129
+0%

Full HD
Ultra

Battlefield 5 110−120
+0%
110−120
+0%
Escape from Tarkov 110−120
+0%
110−120
+0%
Far Cry 5 91
+0%
91
+0%

Full HD
Epic

Fortnite 140−150
+0%
140−150
+0%

1440p
High

Grand Theft Auto V 58
+0%
58
+0%
Metro Exodus 34
+0%
34
+0%
Valorant 230−240
+0%
230−240
+0%

1440p
Ultra

Battlefield 5 85−90
+0%
85−90
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 35−40
+0%
35−40
+0%
Far Cry 5 61
+0%
61
+0%

4K
High

Counter-Strike 2 35−40
+0%
35−40
+0%
Metro Exodus 20
+0%
20
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 40
+0%
40
+0%

4K
Ultra

Battlefield 5 50−55
+0%
50−55
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 35−40
+0%
35−40
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 16−18
+0%
16−18
+0%
Escape from Tarkov 35−40
+0%
35−40
+0%
Far Cry 5 30
+0%
30
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 55−60
+0%
55−60
+0%

This is how Go 7800 GTX and RTX A2000 compete in popular games:

  • RTX A2000 is 8900% faster in 1080p

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive, with 1440p resolution and the High Preset, the RTX A2000 is 11300% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

  • RTX A2000 performs better in 26 tests (44%)
  • there's a draw in 33 tests (56%)

Pros & cons summary

Performance score 0.50 32.21
Recency 29 September 2005 10 August 2021
Maximum RAM amount 512 MB 6 GB
Chip lithography 110 nm 8 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 65 Watt 70 Watt

Go 7800 GTX has 7.7% lower power consumption.

RTX A2000, on the other hand, has a 6342% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 15 years, a 1100% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 1275% more advanced lithography process.

The RTX A2000 is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce Go 7800 GTX in performance tests.

Be aware that GeForce Go 7800 GTX is a notebook graphics card while RTX A2000 is a workstation one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.

NVIDIA GeForce Go 7800 GTX
GeForce Go 7800 GTX
NVIDIA RTX A2000
RTX A2000
Like
Like

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Go 7800 GTX GeForce Go 7800 GTX
vs
GeForce 320M GeForce 320M
RTX A2000 RTX A2000
vs
L20 L20
Go 7800 GTX GeForce Go 7800 GTX
vs
Go 7600 GT GeForce Go 7600 GT
8700M GT 8700M GT
vs
RTX 5050 Mobile RTX 5050 Mobile
FX 1600M FX 1600M
vs
ATI Rage 128 Ultra Rage 128 Ultra
FX 1600M FX 1600M
vs
RTX A500 Mobile RTX A500 Mobile
Go 7800 GTX Go 7800 GTX
vs
Graphics Media Accelerator (GMA) 4500MHD Graphics Media Accelerator (GMA) 4500MHD
Go 7800 GTX Go 7800 GTX
vs
RX 470D RX 470D
Go 7900 GS Go 7900 GS
vs
Graphics Media Accelerator (GMA) 4500MHD Graphics Media Accelerator (GMA) 4500MHD
Go 7900 GS Go 7900 GS
vs
RX 470D RX 470D
Go 7900 GS Go 7900 GS
vs
GMA 3000 GMA 3000
Go 7900 GS Go 7900 GS
vs
Radeon 610M 610M
Go 7900 GS Go 7900 GS
vs
RTX 4060 Mobile RTX 4060 Mobile

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.

1.5 8 votes

Rate GeForce Go 7800 GTX on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.9 620 votes

Rate RTX A2000 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about GeForce Go 7800 GTX or RTX A2000, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.