GeForce RTX 2060 vs Go 7700

Place in the ranking	1263	129
Place by popularity	not in top-100	20
Cost-effectiveness evaluation	no data	40.85
Power efficiency	no data	15.98
Architecture	Curie (2003−2013)	Turing (2018−2022)
GPU code name	G73	TU106
Market segment	Laptop	Desktop
Release date	1 August 2006 (18 years ago)	7 January 2019 (5 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)	no data	$349

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	17	1920
Core clock speed	450 MHz	1365 MHz
Boost clock speed	450 MHz	1680 MHz
Number of transistors	177 million	10,800 million
Manufacturing process technology	90 nm	12 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	no data	160 Watt
Texture fill rate	5.400	201.6
Floating-point processing power	no data	6.451 TFLOPS
ROPs	8	48
TMUs	12	120
Tensor Cores	no data	240
Ray Tracing Cores	no data	30

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop size	medium sized	no data
Interface	PCIe 1.0 x16	PCIe 3.0 x16
Length	no data	229 mm
Width	no data	2-slot
Supplementary power connectors	no data	1x 8-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	GDDR3	GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount	512 MB	6 GB
Memory bus width	128 Bit	192 Bit
Memory clock speed	500 MHz	1750 MHz
Memory bandwidth	16 GB/s	336.0 GB/s
Shared memory	-	-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors	No outputs	1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 2x DisplayPort, 1x USB Type-C
HDMI	-	+
G-SYNC support	-	+

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

VR Ready

no data

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	9.0c (9_3)	12
Shader Model	3.0	6.5
OpenGL	2.1	4.6
OpenCL	N/A	1.2
Vulkan	N/A	1.2.131
CUDA	-	7.5

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Go 7700 0.38

RTX 2060 36.69
+9555%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Go 7700 147

RTX 2060 14151
+9527%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD	1−2 −11700%	118 +11700%
1440p	0−1	72
4K	0−1	49

Cost per frame, $

1080p	no data	2.96
1440p	no data	4.85
4K	no data	7.12

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077

2−3

−3050%

60−65
+3050%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	3−4 −2967%	92 +2967%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	2−3 −5200%	106 +5200%
Cyberpunk 2077	2−3 −3050%	60−65 +3050%
Hitman 3	4−5 −2350%	98 +2350%
Horizon Zero Dawn	8−9 −3000%	248 +3000%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	4−5 −4675%	191 +4675%
Watch Dogs: Legion	27−30 −807%	254 +807%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	3−4 −4267%	131 +4267%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	2−3 −4700%	96 +4700%
Cyberpunk 2077	2−3 −3050%	60−65 +3050%
Hitman 3	4−5 −2300%	96 +2300%
Horizon Zero Dawn	8−9 −2988%	247 +2988%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	4−5 −3200%	130−140 +3200%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	9−10 −744%	75−80 +744%
Watch Dogs: Legion	27−30 −771%	244 +771%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	3−4 −1767%	56 +1767%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	2−3 −3450%	71 +3450%
Cyberpunk 2077	2−3 −3050%	60−65 +3050%
Hitman 3	4−5 −1925%	81 +1925%
Horizon Zero Dawn	8−9 −1400%	120 +1400%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	4−5 −3200%	130−140 +3200%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	9−10 −711%	73 +711%
Watch Dogs: Legion	27−30 −60.7%	45 +60.7%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Cyberpunk 2077	0−1	27−30
Hitman 3	6−7 −800%	54 +800%
Horizon Zero Dawn	2−3 −4350%	89 +4350%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

2−3

−3600%

74
+3600%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	1−2 −2700%	28 +2700%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	0−1	24

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

2−3

−1800%

38
+1800%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Valhalla	79 +0%	79 +0%
Battlefield 5	157 +0%	157 +0%
Far Cry 5	114 +0%	114 +0%
Far Cry New Dawn	128 +0%	128 +0%
Forza Horizon 4	205 +0%	205 +0%
Metro Exodus	144 +0%	144 +0%
Red Dead Redemption 2	109 +0%	109 +0%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Valhalla	64 +0%	64 +0%
Battlefield 5	140 +0%	140 +0%
Far Cry 5	91 +0%	91 +0%
Far Cry New Dawn	95 +0%	95 +0%
Forza Horizon 4	194 +0%	194 +0%
Metro Exodus	140 +0%	140 +0%
Red Dead Redemption 2	103 +0%	103 +0%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Valhalla	55 +0%	55 +0%
Far Cry 5	70 +0%	70 +0%
Forza Horizon 4	105 +0%	105 +0%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

+0%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5	70−75 +0%	70−75 +0%
Far Cry New Dawn	55−60 +0%	55−60 +0%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	35−40 +0%	35−40 +0%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	42 +0%	42 +0%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	51 +0%	51 +0%
Far Cry 5	40−45 +0%	40−45 +0%
Forza Horizon 4	200−210 +0%	200−210 +0%
Metro Exodus	76 +0%	76 +0%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	85−90 +0%	85−90 +0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	50−55 +0%	50−55 +0%
Watch Dogs: Legion	236 +0%	236 +0%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5	40 +0%	40 +0%
Far Cry New Dawn	37 +0%	37 +0%
Hitman 3	30−33 +0%	30−33 +0%
Horizon Zero Dawn	104 +0%	104 +0%
Metro Exodus	52 +0%	52 +0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	51 +0%	51 +0%

4K
Ultra Preset

Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	28 +0%	28 +0%
Cyberpunk 2077	12−14 +0%	12−14 +0%
Far Cry 5	25 +0%	25 +0%
Forza Horizon 4	59 +0%	59 +0%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	45−50 +0%	45−50 +0%
Watch Dogs: Legion	17 +0%	17 +0%

This is how Go 7700 and RTX 2060 compete in popular games:

RTX 2060 is 11700% faster in 1080p

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

in Call of Duty: Modern Warfare, with 1080p resolution and the Medium Preset, the RTX 2060 is 5200% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

RTX 2060 is ahead in 29 tests (41%)
there's a draw in 41 test (59%)

Pros & cons summary

Performance score	0.38	36.69
Recency	1 August 2006	7 January 2019
Maximum RAM amount	512 MB	6 GB
Chip lithography	90 nm	12 nm

RTX 2060 has a 9555.3% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 12 years, a 1100% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 650% more advanced lithography process.

The GeForce RTX 2060 is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce Go 7700 in performance tests.

Be aware that GeForce Go 7700 is a notebook card while GeForce RTX 2060 is a desktop one.

Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.