ATI Radeon E4690 vs GeForce Go 7600

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared GeForce Go 7600 with Radeon E4690, including specs and performance data.

Go 7600
2006
256 MB GDDR3
0.30

E4690 outperforms Go 7600 by a whopping 223% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking13891166
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiencyno data2.49
ArchitectureCurie (2003−2013)TeraScale (2005−2013)
GPU code nameG73RV730
Market segmentLaptopDesktop
Release date1 March 2006 (20 years ago)1 June 2009 (16 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores13320
Core clock speed450 MHz600 MHz
Boost clock speed450 MHzno data
Number of transistors177 million514 million
Manufacturing process technology90 nm55 nm
Power consumption (TDP)no data30 Watt
Texture fill rate3.60019.20
ROPs88
TMUs832

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizemedium sizedno data
InterfacePCIe 1.0 x16MXM-II
Widthno dataMXM Module

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR3GDDR3
Maximum RAM amount256 MB512 MB
Memory bus width128 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed350 MHz1400 MHz
Memory bandwidth11.2 GB/s22.4 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsno data

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX9.0c (9_3)10.1
Shader Model3.04.1
OpenGL2.13.3
OpenCLN/A1.0
VulkanN/A-

Synthetic benchmarks

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score.

Go 7600 0.30
ATI E4690 0.97
+223%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Go 7600 127
Samples: 193
ATI E4690 405
+219%
Samples: 3

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low

Cyberpunk 2077 1−2
−200%
3−4
+200%

Full HD
Medium

Cyberpunk 2077 1−2
−200%
3−4
+200%
Forza Horizon 4 3−4
−200%
9−10
+200%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 7−8
−200%
21−24
+200%
Valorant 24−27
−208%
80−85
+208%

Full HD
High

Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 14−16
−221%
45−50
+221%
Cyberpunk 2077 1−2
−200%
3−4
+200%
Dota 2 9−10
−200%
27−30
+200%
Forza Horizon 4 3−4
−200%
9−10
+200%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 7−8
−200%
21−24
+200%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 5−6
−220%
16−18
+220%
Valorant 24−27
−208%
80−85
+208%

Full HD
Ultra

Cyberpunk 2077 1−2
−200%
3−4
+200%
Dota 2 9−10
−200%
27−30
+200%
Forza Horizon 4 3−4
−200%
9−10
+200%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 7−8
−200%
21−24
+200%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 5−6
−220%
16−18
+220%
Valorant 24−27
−208%
80−85
+208%

1440p
High

Counter-Strike 2 3−4
−200%
9−10
+200%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 0−1 0−1
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 3−4
−200%
9−10
+200%

1440p
Ultra

Forza Horizon 4 1−2
−200%
3−4
+200%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 1−2
−200%
3−4
+200%

4K
High

Grand Theft Auto V 14−16
−221%
45−50
+221%
Valorant 2−3
−200%
6−7
+200%

4K
Ultra

PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 1−2
−200%
3−4
+200%

4K
Epic

Fortnite 2−3
−200%
6−7
+200%

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.30 0.97
Recency 1 March 2006 1 June 2009
Maximum RAM amount 256 MB 512 MB
Chip lithography 90 nm 55 nm

ATI E4690 has a 223% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 3 years, a 100% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 64% more advanced lithography process.

The Radeon E4690 is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce Go 7600 in performance tests.

Be aware that GeForce Go 7600 is a notebook graphics card while Radeon E4690 is a desktop one.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.5 21 votes

Rate GeForce Go 7600 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
5 1 vote

Rate Radeon E4690 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about GeForce Go 7600 or Radeon E4690, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.