GeForce MX450 vs Go 7600

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared GeForce Go 7600 and GeForce MX450, covering specs and all relevant benchmarks.

Go 7600
2006
256 MB GDDR3
0.28

MX450 outperforms Go 7600 by a whopping 2896% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1321469
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiencyno data26.71
ArchitectureCurie (2003−2013)Turing (2018−2022)
GPU code nameG73N17S-G5 / GP107-670-A1
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
Release date1 March 2006 (19 years ago)1 August 2020 (4 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores13896
Core clock speed450 MHz1395 MHz
Boost clock speed450 MHz1575 MHz
Number of transistors177 million4,700 million
Manufacturing process technology90 nm12 nm
Power consumption (TDP)no data25 Watt (12 - 29 Watt TGP)
Texture fill rate3.600100.8
Floating-point processing powerno data3.226 TFLOPS
ROPs832
TMUs864

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizemedium sizedno data
InterfacePCIe 1.0 x16PCIe 4.0 x4
Supplementary power connectorsno dataNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR3GDDR5, GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount256 MB2 GB
Memory bus width128 Bit64 Bit
Memory clock speed350 MHz10000 MHz
Memory bandwidth11.2 GB/s64.03 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsNo outputs

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Optimus-+

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX9.0c (9_3)12 (12_1)
Shader Model3.06.5
OpenGL2.14.6
OpenCLN/A1.2
VulkanN/A1.2
CUDA-7.5

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score.

Go 7600 0.28
GeForce MX450 8.39
+2896%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Go 7600 127
GeForce MX450 3751
+2854%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD0−129
1440p0−117
4K0−125

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Atomic Heart 2−3
−1000%
21−24
+1000%
Cyberpunk 2077 1−2
−3100%
32
+3100%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Atomic Heart 2−3
−1000%
21−24
+1000%
Cyberpunk 2077 1−2
−2100%
22
+2100%
Forza Horizon 4 3−4
−1233%
40−45
+1233%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 7−8
−371%
30−35
+371%
Valorant 24−27
−242%
85−90
+242%

Full HD
High Preset

Atomic Heart 2−3
−1000%
21−24
+1000%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 12−14
−969%
130−140
+969%
Cyberpunk 2077 1−2
−1200%
13
+1200%
Dota 2 10−11
−780%
88
+780%
Forza Horizon 4 3−4
−1233%
40−45
+1233%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 7−8
−371%
30−35
+371%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 4−5
−725%
33
+725%
Valorant 24−27
−242%
85−90
+242%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 1−2
−700%
8
+700%
Dota 2 10−11
−710%
81
+710%
Forza Horizon 4 3−4
−1233%
40−45
+1233%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 7−8
−371%
30−35
+371%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 4−5
−400%
20
+400%
Valorant 24−27
−242%
85−90
+242%

1440p
High Preset

PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 3−4
−1400%
45−50
+1400%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 0−1 8−9
Forza Horizon 4 1−2
−2100%
21−24
+2100%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 1−2
−1300%
14−16
+1300%

1440p
Epic Preset

Fortnite 0−1 18−20

4K
High Preset

Grand Theft Auto V 14−16
−33.3%
20−22
+33.3%
Valorant 2−3
−2300%
45−50
+2300%

4K
Ultra Preset

Far Cry 5 1−2
−800%
9−10
+800%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 2−3
−350%
9−10
+350%

4K
Epic Preset

Fortnite 2−3
−350%
9−10
+350%

Full HD
Low Preset

Counter-Strike 2 88
+0%
88
+0%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Battlefield 5 49
+0%
49
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 67
+0%
67
+0%
Far Cry 5 34
+0%
34
+0%
Fortnite 61
+0%
61
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 34
+0%
34
+0%

Full HD
High Preset

Battlefield 5 38
+0%
38
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 28
+0%
28
+0%
Far Cry 5 29
+0%
29
+0%
Fortnite 39
+0%
39
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 26
+0%
26
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 38
+0%
38
+0%
Metro Exodus 10
+0%
10
+0%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 30
+0%
30
+0%
Far Cry 5 27
+0%
27
+0%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Fortnite 25
+0%
25
+0%

1440p
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 16−18
+0%
16−18
+0%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 70−75
+0%
70−75
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 11
+0%
11
+0%
Metro Exodus 10−11
+0%
10−11
+0%
Valorant 100−110
+0%
100−110
+0%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 22
+0%
22
+0%
Far Cry 5 20
+0%
20
+0%

4K
High Preset

Atomic Heart 7−8
+0%
7−8
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%
Metro Exodus 5−6
+0%
5−6
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 10−11
+0%
10−11
+0%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 10−12
+0%
10−12
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 3−4
+0%
3−4
+0%
Dota 2 32
+0%
32
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 14−16
+0%
14−16
+0%

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in Cyberpunk 2077, with 1080p resolution and the Low Preset, the GeForce MX450 is 3100% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

  • GeForce MX450 is ahead in 29 tests (48%)
  • there's a draw in 32 tests (52%)

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.28 8.39
Recency 1 March 2006 1 August 2020
Maximum RAM amount 256 MB 2 GB
Chip lithography 90 nm 12 nm

GeForce MX450 has a 2896.4% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 14 years, a 700% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 650% more advanced lithography process.

The GeForce MX450 is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce Go 7600 in performance tests.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce Go 7600
GeForce Go 7600
NVIDIA GeForce MX450
GeForce MX450

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.5 21 vote

Rate GeForce Go 7600 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.6 1343 votes

Rate GeForce MX450 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can give us your opinion about GeForce Go 7600 or GeForce MX450, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.