FirePro S9050 vs GeForce Go 7600 GT

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared GeForce Go 7600 GT with FirePro S9050, including specs and performance data.


Go 7600 GT
2006
256 MB GDDR3
0.50

S9050 outperforms Go 7600 GT by a whopping 2244% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1296450
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiencyno data4.01
ArchitectureCurie (2003−2013)GCN 1.0 (2012−2020)
GPU code nameG73Tahiti
Market segmentLaptopWorkstation
Release date1 August 2006 (19 years ago)7 August 2014 (11 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores171792
Core clock speed500 MHz900 MHz
Boost clock speed500 MHzno data
Number of transistors177 million4,313 million
Manufacturing process technology90 nm28 nm
Power consumption (TDP)no data225 Watt
Texture fill rate6.000100.8
Floating-point processing powerno data3.226 TFLOPS
ROPs832
TMUs12112
L1 Cacheno data448 KB
L2 Cacheno data768 KB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizemedium sizedno data
Bus supportno dataPCIe 3.0
InterfacePCIe 1.0 x16PCIe 3.0 x16
Lengthno data254 mm
Widthno data2-slot
Form factorno datafull height / full length
Supplementary power connectorsno data1x 8-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR3GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount256 MB12 GB
Memory bus width128 Bit384 Bit
Memory clock speed600 MHz1375 MHz
Memory bandwidth19.2 GB/s264 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputs1x DisplayPort

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX9.0c (9_3)12 (11_1)
Shader Model3.05.1
OpenGL2.14.6
OpenCLN/A1.2
VulkanN/A1.2.131

Synthetic benchmarks

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score.

Go 7600 GT 0.50
FirePro S9050 11.72
+2244%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Go 7600 GT 210
Samples: 8
FirePro S9050 4901
+2234%
Samples: 2

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low

Cyberpunk 2077 1−2
−2000%
21−24
+2000%

Full HD
Medium

Cyberpunk 2077 1−2
−2000%
21−24
+2000%
Forza Horizon 4 4−5
−2150%
90−95
+2150%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 8−9
−2150%
180−190
+2150%
Valorant 27−30
−2122%
600−650
+2122%

Full HD
High

Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 16−18
−1959%
350−400
+1959%
Cyberpunk 2077 1−2
−2000%
21−24
+2000%
Dota 2 10−12
−2173%
250−260
+2173%
Forza Horizon 4 4−5
−2150%
90−95
+2150%
Metro Exodus 0−1 0−1
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 8−9
−2150%
180−190
+2150%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 5−6
−2100%
110−120
+2100%
Valorant 27−30
−2122%
600−650
+2122%

Full HD
Ultra

Cyberpunk 2077 1−2
−2000%
21−24
+2000%
Dota 2 10−12
−2173%
250−260
+2173%
Forza Horizon 4 4−5
−2150%
90−95
+2150%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 8−9
−2150%
180−190
+2150%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 5−6
−2100%
110−120
+2100%
Valorant 27−30
−2122%
600−650
+2122%

1440p
High

Counter-Strike 2 3−4
−2233%
70−75
+2233%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 2−3
−2150%
45−50
+2150%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 5−6
−2100%
110−120
+2100%

1440p
Ultra

Forza Horizon 4 2−3
−2150%
45−50
+2150%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 1−2
−2000%
21−24
+2000%

1440p
Epic

Fortnite 0−1 0−1

4K
High

Grand Theft Auto V 14−16
−2043%
300−310
+2043%
Valorant 2−3
−2150%
45−50
+2150%

4K
Ultra

PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 2−3
−2150%
45−50
+2150%

4K
Epic

Fortnite 2−3
−2150%
45−50
+2150%

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.50 11.72
Recency 1 August 2006 7 August 2014
Maximum RAM amount 256 MB 12 GB
Chip lithography 90 nm 28 nm

FirePro S9050 has a 2244% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 8 years, a 4700% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 221% more advanced lithography process.

The FirePro S9050 is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce Go 7600 GT in performance tests.

Be aware that GeForce Go 7600 GT is a notebook graphics card while FirePro S9050 is a workstation one.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


No user ratings yet.

Rate GeForce Go 7600 GT on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.2 6 votes

Rate FirePro S9050 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about GeForce Go 7600 GT or FirePro S9050, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.