Arc 7-Cores iGPU vs GeForce Go 7600 GT

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
7200 7300 7300T 7400 7400T 7450 7600 7600 GT 7700 7800 7800 GTX 7800 GTX SLI 7900 GS 7900 GS SLI 7900 GTX 7900 GTX SLI 7900 SE 7950 GTX 7950 GTX SLI
VS
#ad 
Buy on Amazon
Arc 7-Core iGPU Arc 7-Cores iGPU Arc 8-Core iGPU 4-Core iGPU (Arc) 4-Core iGPU (Arrow Lake) 4-Cores iGPU (Arc)

Aggregate performance score

We've compared GeForce Go 7600 GT and Arc 7-Cores iGPU, covering specs and all relevant benchmarks.

Go 7600 GT
2006
256 MB GDDR3
0.50

7-Cores iGPU outperforms Go 7600 GT by a whopping 2994% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Contents

Share:
Go 7600 GT Go 7600 GT
Arc 7-Cores iGPU Arc 7-Cores iGPU

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1287376
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
ArchitectureCurie (2003−2013)Xe LPG (2023)
GPU code nameG73Meteor Lake iGPU
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
Release date1 August 2006 (19 years ago)14 December 2023 (1 year ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores177
Core clock speed500 MHzno data
Boost clock speed500 MHz2200 MHz
Number of transistors177 millionno data
Manufacturing process technology90 nm5 nm
Texture fill rate6.000no data
ROPs8no data
TMUs12no data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizemedium sizedno data
InterfacePCIe 1.0 x16no data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR3no data
Maximum RAM amount256 MBno data
Memory bus width128 Bitno data
Memory clock speed600 MHzno data
Memory bandwidth19.2 GB/sno data
Shared memory--
Resizable BAR-+

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsno data

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX9.0c (9_3)12_2
Shader Model3.0no data
OpenGL2.1no data
OpenCLN/Ano data
VulkanN/A-

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD1−2
−3300%
34
+3300%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low

Cyberpunk 2077 1−2
−3100%
32
+3100%

Full HD
Medium

Cyberpunk 2077 1−2
−2600%
27
+2600%
Forza Horizon 4 4−5
−1525%
65−70
+1525%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 8−9
−625%
55−60
+625%
Valorant 27−30
−370%
120−130
+370%

Full HD
High

Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 16−18
−1112%
200−210
+1112%
Cyberpunk 2077 1−2
−2200%
23
+2200%
Dota 2 10−12
−2627%
300−310
+2627%
Forza Horizon 4 4−5
−1525%
65−70
+1525%
Metro Exodus 0−1 30−35
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 8−9
−625%
55−60
+625%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 6−7
−767%
52
+767%
Valorant 27−30
−370%
120−130
+370%

Full HD
Ultra

Cyberpunk 2077 1−2
−2100%
22
+2100%
Dota 2 10−12
−2627%
300−310
+2627%
Forza Horizon 4 4−5
−1525%
65−70
+1525%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 8−9
−625%
55−60
+625%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 6−7
−267%
22
+267%
Valorant 27−30
−2863%
800−850
+2863%

1440p
High

Counter-Strike 2 3−4
−933%
30−35
+933%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 2−3
−5700%
110−120
+5700%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 5−6
−2900%
150−160
+2900%

1440p
Ultra

Escape from Tarkov 2−3
−1550%
30−35
+1550%
Forza Horizon 4 2−3
−1800%
35−40
+1800%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 2−3
−1050%
21−24
+1050%

1440p
Epic

Fortnite 0−1 35−40

4K
High

Grand Theft Auto V 14−16
−107%
27−30
+107%
Valorant 3−4
−2800%
85−90
+2800%

4K
Ultra

PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 2−3
−650%
14−16
+650%

4K
Epic

Fortnite 2−3
−700%
16−18
+700%

Full HD
Low

Counter-Strike 2 90
+0%
90
+0%

Full HD
Medium

Battlefield 5 65−70
+0%
65−70
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 58
+0%
58
+0%
Escape from Tarkov 60−65
+0%
60−65
+0%
Far Cry 5 38
+0%
38
+0%
Fortnite 85−90
+0%
85−90
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 45−50
+0%
45−50
+0%

Full HD
High

Battlefield 5 65−70
+0%
65−70
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 31
+0%
31
+0%
Escape from Tarkov 60−65
+0%
60−65
+0%
Far Cry 5 34
+0%
34
+0%
Fortnite 85−90
+0%
85−90
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 45−50
+0%
45−50
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 23
+0%
23
+0%

Full HD
Ultra

Battlefield 5 65−70
+0%
65−70
+0%
Escape from Tarkov 60−65
+0%
60−65
+0%
Far Cry 5 35
+0%
35
+0%

Full HD
Epic

Fortnite 85−90
+0%
85−90
+0%

1440p
High

Grand Theft Auto V 24−27
+0%
24−27
+0%
Metro Exodus 20−22
+0%
20−22
+0%
Valorant 150−160
+0%
150−160
+0%

1440p
Ultra

Battlefield 5 40−45
+0%
40−45
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 14−16
+0%
14−16
+0%
Far Cry 5 35−40
+0%
35−40
+0%

4K
High

Counter-Strike 2 12−14
+0%
12−14
+0%
Metro Exodus 12−14
+0%
12−14
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 21−24
+0%
21−24
+0%

4K
Ultra

Battlefield 5 21−24
+0%
21−24
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 6−7
+0%
6−7
+0%
Escape from Tarkov 14−16
+0%
14−16
+0%
Far Cry 5 16−18
+0%
16−18
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 27−30
+0%
27−30
+0%

This is how Go 7600 GT and Arc 7-Cores iGPU compete in popular games:

  • Arc 7-Cores iGPU is 3300% faster in 1080p

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive, with 1440p resolution and the High Preset, the Arc 7-Cores iGPU is 5700% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

  • Arc 7-Cores iGPU performs better in 24 tests (43%)
  • there's a draw in 32 tests (57%)

Pros & cons summary

Performance score 0.50 15.47
Recency 1 August 2006 14 December 2023
Chip lithography 90 nm 5 nm

Arc 7-Cores iGPU has a 2994% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 17 years, and a 1700% more advanced lithography process.

The Arc 7-Cores iGPU is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce Go 7600 GT in performance tests.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.

NVIDIA GeForce Go 7600 GT
GeForce Go 7600 GT
Intel Arc 7-Cores iGPU
Arc 7-Cores iGPU
Like
Like

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Go 7600 GT GeForce Go 7600 GT
vs
Go 7800 GTX GeForce Go 7800 GTX
Arc 7-Cores iGPU Arc 7 Cores iGPU
vs
GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q
Go 7600 GT GeForce Go 7600 GT
vs
GeForce 320M GeForce 320M
GeForce 315M GeForce 315M
vs
GMA 3150 3150
GeForce 315M GeForce 315M
vs
HD 8280 Mobile IGP 8280 Mobile IGP
Go 7600 GT NVIDIA Go 7600 GT
vs
9300M GS 9300M GS
Go 7600 GT NVIDIA Go 7600 GT
vs
ATI 9500 9500
Go 7600 GT NVIDIA Go 7600 GT
vs
RTX 3050 8 GB 3050 8 GB
9500M G GeForce 9500M G
vs
RTX 5060 5060
8600M GS GeForce 8600M GS
vs
ATI Mobility HD 4350 4350
8600M GS GeForce 8600M GS
vs
PRO V710 V710
NVS 2100M NVS 2100M
vs
RTX 3060 Mobile 3060 Mobile
Go 7700 NVIDIA Go 7700
vs
9300M GS 9300M GS

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.

No user ratings yet.

Rate GeForce Go 7600 GT on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.5 109 votes

Rate Arc 7-Cores iGPU on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about GeForce Go 7600 GT or Arc 7-Cores iGPU, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.