Radeon R7 A360 vs GeForce Go 7400

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared GeForce Go 7400 and Radeon R7 A360, covering specs and all relevant benchmarks.

Go 7400
2006
128 MB GDDR3
0.16

R7 A360 outperforms Go 7400 by a whopping 819% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking14871031
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
ArchitectureCurie (2003−2013)GCN 3.0 (2014−2019)
GPU code nameG72Meso
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
Release date1 February 2006 (20 years ago)5 May 2015 (10 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores7384
Core clock speed450 MHz1100 MHz
Boost clock speed450 MHz1125 MHz
Number of transistors112 million1,550 million
Manufacturing process technology90 nm28 nm
Texture fill rate1.80027.00
Floating-point processing powerno data0.864 TFLOPS
ROPs28
TMUs424
L1 Cacheno data96 KB
L2 Cacheno data128 KB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 1.0 x16PCIe 3.0 x8

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR3DDR3
Maximum RAM amount128 MB2 GB
Memory bus width64 Bit64 Bit
Memory clock speed450 MHz900 MHz
Memory bandwidth7.2 GB/s14.4 GB/s
Shared memory-no data

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsNo outputs

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX9.0c (9_3)12 (12_0)
Shader Model3.06.0
OpenGL2.14.6
OpenCLN/A2.0
VulkanN/A1.2.131

Synthetic benchmarks

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score.

Go 7400 0.16
R7 A360 1.47
+819%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Go 7400 65
Samples: 150
R7 A360 615
+846%
Samples: 8

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low

Cyberpunk 2077 1−2
−800%
9−10
+800%

Full HD
Medium

Cyberpunk 2077 1−2
−800%
9−10
+800%
Forza Horizon 4 3−4
−800%
27−30
+800%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 7−8
−757%
60−65
+757%
Valorant 24−27
−817%
220−230
+817%

Full HD
High

Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 10−12
−809%
100−105
+809%
Cyberpunk 2077 1−2
−800%
9−10
+800%
Dota 2 8−9
−775%
70−75
+775%
Forza Horizon 4 3−4
−800%
27−30
+800%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 7−8
−757%
60−65
+757%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 5−6
−800%
45−50
+800%
Valorant 24−27
−817%
220−230
+817%

Full HD
Ultra

Cyberpunk 2077 1−2
−800%
9−10
+800%
Dota 2 8−9
−775%
70−75
+775%
Forza Horizon 4 3−4
−800%
27−30
+800%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 7−8
−757%
60−65
+757%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 5−6
−800%
45−50
+800%
Valorant 24−27
−817%
220−230
+817%

1440p
High

Counter-Strike 2 3−4
−800%
27−30
+800%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 2−3
−800%
18−20
+800%

1440p
Ultra

Forza Horizon 4 1−2
−800%
9−10
+800%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 1−2
−800%
9−10
+800%

4K
High

Grand Theft Auto V 14−16
−757%
120−130
+757%
Valorant 1−2
−800%
9−10
+800%

4K
Ultra

PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 1−2
−800%
9−10
+800%

4K
Epic

Fortnite 2−3
−800%
18−20
+800%

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.16 1.47
Recency 1 February 2006 5 May 2015
Maximum RAM amount 128 MB 2 GB
Chip lithography 90 nm 28 nm

R7 A360 has a 819% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 9 years, a 1500% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 221% more advanced lithography process.

The Radeon R7 A360 is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce Go 7400 in performance tests.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4.1 9 votes

Rate GeForce Go 7400 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.5 4 votes

Rate Radeon R7 A360 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about GeForce Go 7400 or Radeon R7 A360, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.