Quadro RTX 3000 Mobile vs GeForce Go 7400

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared GeForce Go 7400 with Quadro RTX 3000 Mobile, including specs and performance data.

Go 7400
2006
128 MB GDDR3
0.17

RTX 3000 Mobile outperforms Go 7400 by a whopping 15024% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1422218
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiencyno data22.57
ArchitectureCurie (2003−2013)Turing (2018−2022)
GPU code nameG72TU106
Market segmentLaptopMobile workstation
Release date1 February 2006 (19 years ago)27 May 2019 (5 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores72304
Core clock speed450 MHz945 MHz
Boost clock speed450 MHz1380 MHz
Number of transistors112 million10,800 million
Manufacturing process technology90 nm12 nm
Power consumption (TDP)no data80 Watt
Texture fill rate1.800198.7
Floating-point processing powerno data6.359 TFLOPS
ROPs264
TMUs4144
Tensor Coresno data288
Ray Tracing Coresno data36

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizeno datalarge
InterfacePCIe 1.0 x16PCIe 3.0 x16

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR3GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount128 MB6 GB
Memory bus width64 Bit256 Bit
Memory clock speed450 MHz1750 MHz
Memory bandwidth7.2 GB/s448.0 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsNo outputs
G-SYNC support-+

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

VR Readyno data+

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX9.0c (9_3)12 Ultimate (12_1)
Shader Model3.06.5
OpenGL2.14.6
OpenCLN/A1.2
VulkanN/A1.2.131
CUDA-7.5
DLSS-+

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score.

Go 7400 0.17
RTX 3000 Mobile 25.71
+15024%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Go 7400 65
RTX 3000 Mobile 10116
+15463%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD0−195
4K0−188

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Atomic Heart 1−2
−6700%
65−70
+6700%
Counter-Strike 2 7−8
−600%
45−50
+600%
Cyberpunk 2077 1−2
−5300%
50−55
+5300%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Atomic Heart 1−2
−6700%
65−70
+6700%
Counter-Strike 2 7−8
−600%
45−50
+600%
Cyberpunk 2077 1−2
−5300%
50−55
+5300%
Forza Horizon 4 2−3
−4800%
95−100
+4800%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 7−8
−1271%
95−100
+1271%
Valorant 24−27
−572%
160−170
+572%

Full HD
High Preset

Atomic Heart 1−2
−6700%
65−70
+6700%
Counter-Strike 2 7−8
−600%
45−50
+600%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 10−12
−2255%
250−260
+2255%
Cyberpunk 2077 1−2
−5300%
50−55
+5300%
Dota 2 9−10
−1367%
132
+1367%
Forza Horizon 4 2−3
−4800%
95−100
+4800%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 7−8
−1271%
95−100
+1271%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 3−4
−3533%
109
+3533%
Valorant 24−27
−572%
160−170
+572%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Counter-Strike 2 7−8
−600%
45−50
+600%
Cyberpunk 2077 1−2
−5300%
50−55
+5300%
Dota 2 9−10
−1244%
121
+1244%
Forza Horizon 4 2−3
−4800%
95−100
+4800%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 7−8
−1271%
95−100
+1271%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 3−4
−1767%
56
+1767%
Valorant 24−27
−572%
160−170
+572%

1440p
High Preset

PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 1−2
−17400%
170−180
+17400%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Forza Horizon 4 0−1 60−65
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 1−2
−4000%
40−45
+4000%

4K
High Preset

Atomic Heart 0−1 20−22
Grand Theft Auto V 14−16
−207%
45−50
+207%
Valorant 2−3
−7100%
140−150
+7100%

4K
Ultra Preset

Far Cry 5 1−2
−2700%
27−30
+2700%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 2−3
−1200%
24−27
+1200%

4K
Epic Preset

Fortnite 2−3
−1250%
27−30
+1250%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Battlefield 5 95−100
+0%
95−100
+0%
Far Cry 5 80−85
+0%
80−85
+0%
Fortnite 120−130
+0%
120−130
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 70−75
+0%
70−75
+0%

Full HD
High Preset

Battlefield 5 95−100
+0%
95−100
+0%
Far Cry 5 80−85
+0%
80−85
+0%
Fortnite 120−130
+0%
120−130
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 70−75
+0%
70−75
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 90−95
+0%
90−95
+0%
Metro Exodus 55−60
+0%
55−60
+0%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 95−100
+0%
95−100
+0%
Far Cry 5 80−85
+0%
80−85
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 70−75
+0%
70−75
+0%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Fortnite 120−130
+0%
120−130
+0%

1440p
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 24−27
+0%
24−27
+0%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 170−180
+0%
170−180
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 45−50
+0%
45−50
+0%
Metro Exodus 30−35
+0%
30−35
+0%
Valorant 200−210
+0%
200−210
+0%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 65−70
+0%
65−70
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 24−27
+0%
24−27
+0%
Far Cry 5 55−60
+0%
55−60
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 40−45
+0%
40−45
+0%

1440p
Epic Preset

Fortnite 55−60
+0%
55−60
+0%

4K
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 12−14
+0%
12−14
+0%
Metro Exodus 21−24
+0%
21−24
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 35−40
+0%
35−40
+0%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 35−40
+0%
35−40
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 12−14
+0%
12−14
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 10−12
+0%
10−12
+0%
Dota 2 88
+0%
88
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 40−45
+0%
40−45
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 24−27
+0%
24−27
+0%

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS, with 1440p resolution and the High Preset, the RTX 3000 Mobile is 17400% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

  • RTX 3000 Mobile is ahead in 32 tests (49%)
  • there's a draw in 33 tests (51%)

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.17 25.71
Recency 1 February 2006 27 May 2019
Maximum RAM amount 128 MB 6 GB
Chip lithography 90 nm 12 nm

RTX 3000 Mobile has a 15023.5% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 13 years, a 4700% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 650% more advanced lithography process.

The Quadro RTX 3000 Mobile is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce Go 7400 in performance tests.

Be aware that GeForce Go 7400 is a notebook graphics card while Quadro RTX 3000 Mobile is a mobile workstation one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce Go 7400
GeForce Go 7400
NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 Mobile
Quadro RTX 3000

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4 7 votes

Rate GeForce Go 7400 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4 320 votes

Rate Quadro RTX 3000 Mobile on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can give us your opinion about GeForce Go 7400 or Quadro RTX 3000 Mobile, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.