Radeon 610M vs GeForce Go 7200

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared GeForce Go 7200 and Radeon 610M, covering specs and all relevant benchmarks.

Go 7200
2006
64 MB GDDR3
0.12

610M outperforms Go 7200 by a whopping 2308% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1443790
Place by popularitynot in top-10050
Power efficiencyno data13.26
ArchitectureCurie (2003−2013)RDNA 2.0 (2020−2024)
GPU code nameG72Dragon Range
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
Release date1 September 2006 (18 years ago)3 January 2023 (2 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores7128
Core clock speed450 MHz400 MHz
Boost clock speed450 MHz2200 MHz
Number of transistors112 millionno data
Manufacturing process technology90 nm5 nm
Power consumption (TDP)no data15 Watt
Texture fill rate1.80017.60
Floating-point processing powerno data0.5632 TFLOPS
ROPs14
TMUs48
Ray Tracing Coresno data2

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 1.0 x16PCIe 4.0 x8
Supplementary power connectorsno dataNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR3System Shared
Maximum RAM amount64 MBSystem Shared
Memory bus width32 BitSystem Shared
Memory clock speed350 MHzSystem Shared
Memory bandwidth2.8 GB/sno data
Shared memory-+

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsPortable Device Dependent

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX9.0c (9_3)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model3.06.7
OpenGL2.14.6
OpenCLN/A2.1
VulkanN/A1.3

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Go 7200 0.12
Radeon 610M 2.89
+2308%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Go 7200 45
Radeon 610M 1111
+2369%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD0−113
1440p2−3
−2950%
61
+2950%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Counter-Strike 2 8−9
−25%
10−11
+25%
Cyberpunk 2077 2−3
−200%
6−7
+200%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Counter-Strike 2 8−9
−25%
10−11
+25%
Cyberpunk 2077 2−3
−200%
6−7
+200%
Forza Horizon 4 5−6
−280%
19
+280%
Red Dead Redemption 2 4−5
−150%
10−11
+150%

Full HD
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 8−9
−25%
10−11
+25%
Cyberpunk 2077 2−3
−200%
6−7
+200%
Far Cry 5 6−7
−250%
21
+250%
Forza Horizon 4 5−6
−180%
14
+180%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 5−6
−440%
27−30
+440%
Red Dead Redemption 2 4−5
−150%
10−11
+150%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 4−5
−175%
10−12
+175%
World of Tanks 10−11
−420%
50−55
+420%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Counter-Strike 2 8−9
−25%
10−11
+25%
Cyberpunk 2077 2−3
−200%
6−7
+200%
Far Cry 5 6−7
−167%
16−18
+167%
Forza Horizon 4 5−6
−120%
11
+120%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 5−6
−440%
27−30
+440%

1440p
High Preset

PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 1−2
−1900%
20−22
+1900%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Counter-Strike 2 9−10
+0%
9−10
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 2−3
−50%
3−4
+50%
Far Cry 5 4−5
−75%
7−8
+75%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 1−2
−300%
4−5
+300%
Valorant 4−5
−125%
9−10
+125%

4K
High Preset

Dota 2 14−16
−6.7%
16−18
+6.7%
Grand Theft Auto V 14−16
+0%
14−16
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 0−1 8−9
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 14−16
+0%
14−16
+0%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 0−1 2−3
Cyberpunk 2077 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%
Dota 2 14−16
−6.7%
16−18
+6.7%
Valorant 0−1 3−4

Full HD
Low Preset

Elden Ring 5−6
+0%
5−6
+0%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Battlefield 5 7−8
+0%
7−8
+0%
Metro Exodus 16
+0%
16
+0%
Valorant 0−1 0−1

Full HD
High Preset

Battlefield 5 7−8
+0%
7−8
+0%
Dota 2 10
+0%
10
+0%
Elden Ring 5−6
+0%
5−6
+0%
Fortnite 16−18
+0%
16−18
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 16
+0%
16
+0%
Metro Exodus 11
+0%
11
+0%
Valorant 0−1 0−1

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 7−8
+0%
7−8
+0%
Dota 2 8−9
+0%
8−9
+0%
Valorant 0−1 0−1

1440p
High Preset

Dota 2 0−1 0−1
Elden Ring 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%
Red Dead Redemption 2 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%
World of Tanks 20−22
+0%
20−22
+0%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%

4K
High Preset

Elden Ring 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%
Red Dead Redemption 2 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%

4K
Ultra Preset

Far Cry 5 3−4
+0%
3−4
+0%
Fortnite 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%

This is how Go 7200 and Radeon 610M compete in popular games:

  • Radeon 610M is 2950% faster in 1440p

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS, with 1440p resolution and the High Preset, the Radeon 610M is 1900% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

  • Radeon 610M is ahead in 26 tests (51%)
  • there's a draw in 25 tests (49%)

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.12 2.89
Recency 1 September 2006 3 January 2023
Chip lithography 90 nm 5 nm

Radeon 610M has a 2308.3% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 16 years, and a 1700% more advanced lithography process.

The Radeon 610M is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce Go 7200 in performance tests.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce Go 7200
GeForce Go 7200
AMD Radeon 610M
Radeon 610M

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


1.8 21 vote

Rate GeForce Go 7200 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.2 804 votes

Rate Radeon 610M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.