GeForce RTX 2060 Super vs Go 7200

Place in the ranking	1441	90
Place by popularity	not in top-100	17
Cost-effectiveness evaluation	no data	47.03
Power efficiency	no data	16.79
Architecture	Curie (2003−2013)	Turing (2018−2022)
GPU code name	G72	TU106
Market segment	Laptop	Desktop
Release date	1 September 2006 (18 years ago)	9 July 2019 (5 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)	no data	$399

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	7	2176
Core clock speed	450 MHz	1470 MHz
Boost clock speed	450 MHz	1650 MHz
Number of transistors	112 million	10,800 million
Manufacturing process technology	90 nm	12 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	no data	175 Watt
Texture fill rate	1.800	224.4
Floating-point processing power	no data	7.181 TFLOPS
ROPs	1	64
TMUs	4	136
Tensor Cores	no data	272
Ray Tracing Cores	no data	34

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Interface	PCIe 1.0 x16	PCIe 3.0 x16
Length	no data	229 mm
Width	no data	2-slot
Supplementary power connectors	no data	1x 8-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	GDDR3	GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount	64 MB	8 GB
Memory bus width	32 Bit	256 Bit
Memory clock speed	350 MHz	1750 MHz
Memory bandwidth	2.8 GB/s	448.0 GB/s
Shared memory	-	-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors	No outputs	1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 2x DisplayPort, 1x USB Type-C
HDMI	-	+
G-SYNC support	-	+

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

VR Ready

no data

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	9.0c (9_3)	12 Ultimate (12_1)
Shader Model	3.0	6.5
OpenGL	2.1	4.6
OpenCL	N/A	1.2
Vulkan	N/A	1.2.131
CUDA	-	7.5

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Go 7200 0.12

RTX 2060 Super 42.87
+35625%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Go 7200 45

RTX 2060 Super 16519
+36609%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD	-0−1	117
1440p	-0−1	67
4K	-0−1	42

Cost per frame, $

1080p	no data	3.41
1440p	no data	5.96
4K	no data	9.50

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077

2−3

−4300%

88
+4300%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	3−4 −3267%	101 +3267%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	2−3 −5000%	102 +5000%
Cyberpunk 2077	2−3 −3850%	79 +3850%
Hitman 3	4−5 −2250%	94 +2250%
Horizon Zero Dawn	8−9 −3625%	298 +3625%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	4−5 −5025%	205 +5025%
Watch Dogs: Legion	27−30 −718%	229 +718%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	3−4 −4800%	147 +4800%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	2−3 −4650%	95 +4650%
Cyberpunk 2077	2−3 −3450%	71 +3450%
Hitman 3	4−5 −2350%	98 +2350%
Horizon Zero Dawn	8−9 −3563%	293 +3563%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	4−5 −4500%	184 +4500%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	9−10 −878%	85−90 +878%
Watch Dogs: Legion	27−30 −671%	216 +671%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	3−4 −1933%	61 +1933%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	2−3 −3450%	71 +3450%
Cyberpunk 2077	2−3 −3000%	62 +3000%
Hitman 3	4−5 −2000%	84 +2000%
Horizon Zero Dawn	8−9 −1538%	131 +1538%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	4−5 −3800%	156 +3800%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	9−10 −844%	85 +844%
Watch Dogs: Legion	27−30 −111%	59 +111%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Cyberpunk 2077	0−1	40
Hitman 3	6−7 −867%	58 +867%
Horizon Zero Dawn	2−3 −4850%	99 +4850%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

2−3

−4000%

82
+4000%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	1−2 −3400%	35 +3400%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	0−1	29

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

2−3

−2000%

42
+2000%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Valhalla	81 +0%	81 +0%
Battlefield 5	163 +0%	163 +0%
Far Cry 5	130 +0%	130 +0%
Far Cry New Dawn	144 +0%	144 +0%
Forza Horizon 4	299 +0%	299 +0%
Metro Exodus	144 +0%	144 +0%
Red Dead Redemption 2	122 +0%	122 +0%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Valhalla	68 +0%	68 +0%
Battlefield 5	150 +0%	150 +0%
Far Cry 5	108 +0%	108 +0%
Far Cry New Dawn	106 +0%	106 +0%
Forza Horizon 4	271 +0%	271 +0%
Metro Exodus	144 +0%	144 +0%
Red Dead Redemption 2	95 +0%	95 +0%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Valhalla	61 +0%	61 +0%
Far Cry 5	74 +0%	74 +0%
Forza Horizon 4	120 +0%	120 +0%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

114

+0%

114

+0%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5	96 +0%	96 +0%
Far Cry New Dawn	74 +0%	74 +0%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	52 +0%	52 +0%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	47 +0%	47 +0%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	53 +0%	53 +0%
Far Cry 5	57 +0%	57 +0%
Forza Horizon 4	259 +0%	259 +0%
Metro Exodus	87 +0%	87 +0%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	114 +0%	114 +0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	60−65 +0%	60−65 +0%
Watch Dogs: Legion	212 +0%	212 +0%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5	47 +0%	47 +0%
Far Cry New Dawn	41 +0%	41 +0%
Hitman 3	39 +0%	39 +0%
Horizon Zero Dawn	105 +0%	105 +0%
Metro Exodus	64 +0%	64 +0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	59 +0%	59 +0%

4K
Ultra Preset

Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	30 +0%	30 +0%
Cyberpunk 2077	19 +0%	19 +0%
Far Cry 5	30 +0%	30 +0%
Forza Horizon 4	67 +0%	67 +0%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	65 +0%	65 +0%
Watch Dogs: Legion	25 +0%	25 +0%

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

in Shadow of the Tomb Raider, with 1080p resolution and the Medium Preset, the RTX 2060 Super is 5025% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

RTX 2060 Super is ahead in 29 tests (41%)
there's a draw in 41 test (59%)

Pros & cons summary

Performance score	0.12	42.87
Recency	1 September 2006	9 July 2019
Maximum RAM amount	64 MB	8 GB
Chip lithography	90 nm	12 nm

RTX 2060 Super has a 35625% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 12 years, a 12700% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 650% more advanced lithography process.

The GeForce RTX 2060 Super is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce Go 7200 in performance tests.

Be aware that GeForce Go 7200 is a notebook card while GeForce RTX 2060 Super is a desktop one.

Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.