UHD Graphics 610 vs GeForce Go 6800 Ultra
Aggregate performance score
We've compared GeForce Go 6800 Ultra and UHD Graphics 610, covering specs and all relevant benchmarks.
UHD Graphics 610 outperforms Go 6800 Ultra by a whopping 427% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Contents
Primary details
GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.
| Place in the ranking | 1344 | 956 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Power efficiency | 0.28 | 8.85 |
| Architecture | Curie (2003−2013) | Generation 9.5 (2016−2020) |
| GPU code name | NV41 | Coffee Lake GT1 |
| Market segment | Laptop | Laptop |
| Release date | 24 February 2005 (20 years ago) | 3 April 2018 (7 years ago) |
Detailed specifications
General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.
| Pipelines / CUDA cores | 17 | 96 |
| Core clock speed | 450 MHz | 300 MHz |
| Boost clock speed | 450 MHz | 900 MHz |
| Number of transistors | 190 million | 189 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 130 nm | 14 nm+++ |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 89 Watt | 15 Watt |
| Texture fill rate | 5.400 | 10.80 |
| Floating-point processing power | no data | 0.1728 TFLOPS |
| ROPs | 8 | 2 |
| TMUs | 12 | 12 |
Form factor & compatibility
Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).
| Laptop size | large | no data |
| Interface | PCIe 1.0 x16 | Ring Bus |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | no data |
VRAM capacity and type
Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.
| Memory type | GDDR3 | System Shared |
| Maximum RAM amount | 256 MB | System Shared |
| Memory bus width | 256 Bit | System Shared |
| Memory clock speed | 600 MHz | System Shared |
| Memory bandwidth | 38.4 GB/s | no data |
| Shared memory | - | + |
Connectivity and outputs
This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.
| Display Connectors | Portable Device Dependent | Portable Device Dependent |
Supported technologies
Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.
| Quick Sync | no data | + |
API and SDK compatibility
List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.
| DirectX | 9.0c (9_3) | 12 (12_1) |
| Shader Model | 3.0 | 6.4 |
| OpenGL | 2.0 (full) 2.1 (partial) | 4.6 |
| OpenCL | N/A | 3.0 |
| Vulkan | N/A | 1.3 |
Synthetic benchmark performance
Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.
Combined synthetic benchmark score
This is our combined benchmark score.
Passmark
This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.
Gaming performance
Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.
Average FPS across all PC games
Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:
| Full HD | 1−2
−700%
| 8
+700%
|
FPS performance in popular games
Full HD
Low Preset
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 1−2
−200%
|
3−4
+200%
|
| God of War | 4−5
−50%
|
6−7
+50%
|
Full HD
Medium Preset
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 1−2
−200%
|
3−4
+200%
|
| Forza Horizon 4 | 4−5
−150%
|
10−11
+150%
|
| God of War | 4−5
−50%
|
6−7
+50%
|
| PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 7−8
−57.1%
|
10−12
+57.1%
|
| Valorant | 24−27
−48%
|
35−40
+48%
|
Full HD
High Preset
| Counter-Strike: Global Offensive | 14−16
−164%
|
35−40
+164%
|
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 1−2
−200%
|
3−4
+200%
|
| Dota 2 | 10−11
−20%
|
12
+20%
|
| Forza Horizon 4 | 4−5
−150%
|
10−11
+150%
|
| God of War | 4−5
−50%
|
6−7
+50%
|
| Metro Exodus | 0−1 | 3−4 |
| PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 7−8
−57.1%
|
10−12
+57.1%
|
| The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 5−6
+25%
|
4
−25%
|
| Valorant | 24−27
−48%
|
35−40
+48%
|
Full HD
Ultra Preset
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 1−2
−200%
|
3−4
+200%
|
| Dota 2 | 10−11
−10%
|
11
+10%
|
| Forza Horizon 4 | 4−5
−150%
|
10−11
+150%
|
| God of War | 4−5
−50%
|
6−7
+50%
|
| PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 7−8
−57.1%
|
10−12
+57.1%
|
| The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 5−6
−60%
|
8−9
+60%
|
| Valorant | 24−27
−48%
|
35−40
+48%
|
1440p
High Preset
| Counter-Strike 2 | 2−3
−100%
|
4−5
+100%
|
| Counter-Strike: Global Offensive | 0−1 | 12−14 |
| PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 4−5
−350%
|
18−20
+350%
|
1440p
Ultra Preset
| Forza Horizon 4 | 1−2
−400%
|
5−6
+400%
|
1440p
Epic Preset
| Fortnite | 0−1 | 3−4 |
4K
High Preset
| Grand Theft Auto V | 14−16
−6.7%
|
16−18
+6.7%
|
| Valorant | 2−3
−350%
|
9−10
+350%
|
4K
Ultra Preset
| PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 1−2
−200%
|
3−4
+200%
|
4K
Epic Preset
| Fortnite | 2−3
−50%
|
3−4
+50%
|
Full HD
Low Preset
| Counter-Strike 2 | 2−3
+0%
|
2−3
+0%
|
Full HD
Medium Preset
| Battlefield 5 | 4−5
+0%
|
4−5
+0%
|
| Counter-Strike 2 | 2−3
+0%
|
2−3
+0%
|
| Far Cry 5 | 4
+0%
|
4
+0%
|
| Fortnite | 7−8
+0%
|
7−8
+0%
|
| Forza Horizon 5 | 2−3
+0%
|
2−3
+0%
|
Full HD
High Preset
| Battlefield 5 | 4−5
+0%
|
4−5
+0%
|
| Counter-Strike 2 | 2−3
+0%
|
2−3
+0%
|
| Far Cry 5 | 3
+0%
|
3
+0%
|
| Fortnite | 7−8
+0%
|
7−8
+0%
|
| Forza Horizon 5 | 2−3
+0%
|
2−3
+0%
|
| Grand Theft Auto V | 3
+0%
|
3
+0%
|
Full HD
Ultra Preset
| Battlefield 5 | 4−5
+0%
|
4−5
+0%
|
| Far Cry 5 | 4−5
+0%
|
4−5
+0%
|
Full HD
Epic Preset
| Fortnite | 7−8
+0%
|
7−8
+0%
|
1440p
High Preset
| Valorant | 10−12
+0%
|
10−12
+0%
|
1440p
Ultra Preset
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 1−2
+0%
|
1−2
+0%
|
| Far Cry 5 | 2−3
+0%
|
2−3
+0%
|
| God of War | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 1−2
+0%
|
1−2
+0%
|
4K
Ultra Preset
| Dota 2 | 3−4
+0%
|
3−4
+0%
|
| Far Cry 5 | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| Forza Horizon 4 | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| God of War | 1−2
+0%
|
1−2
+0%
|
This is how Go 6800 Ultra and UHD Graphics 610 compete in popular games:
- UHD Graphics 610 is 700% faster in 1080p
Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:
- in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt, with 1080p resolution and the High Preset, the Go 6800 Ultra is 25% faster.
- in Forza Horizon 4, with 1440p resolution and the Ultra Preset, the UHD Graphics 610 is 400% faster.
All in all, in popular games:
- Go 6800 Ultra performs better in 1 test (2%)
- UHD Graphics 610 performs better in 28 tests (56%)
- there's a draw in 21 tests (42%)
Pros & cons summary
| Performance score | 0.33 | 1.74 |
| Recency | 24 February 2005 | 3 April 2018 |
| Chip lithography | 130 nm | 14 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 89 Watt | 15 Watt |
UHD Graphics 610 has a 427.3% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 13 years, a 828.6% more advanced lithography process, and 493.3% lower power consumption.
The UHD Graphics 610 is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce Go 6800 Ultra in performance tests.
Other comparisons
We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.
