Radeon Vega 7 vs GeForce Go 6800 Ultra

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
6100 6100 + nForce Go 430 6150 6150 + nForce Go 430 6200 6200 TE 6250 6400 6600 6600 NPB 128M 6600 TE 6800 6800 Ultra
VS
#ad 
Buy on Amazon
Graphics 320SP Graphics 384SP Mobile Graphics 448SP Mobile Graphics 512SP Mobile Vega 7

Aggregate performance score

We've compared GeForce Go 6800 Ultra and Radeon Vega 7, covering specs and all relevant benchmarks.

Go 6800 Ultra
2005
256 MB GDDR3, 89 Watt
0.33

Vega 7 outperforms 6800 Ultra by a whopping 1939% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Contents

Share:
Go 6800 Ultra Go 6800 Ultra
Vega 7 Vega 7

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1373606
Place by popularitynot in top-10015
Power efficiency0.2911.52
ArchitectureCurie (2003−2013)GCN 5.1 (2018−2022)
GPU code nameNV41Cezanne
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
Release date24 February 2005 (21 years ago)13 April 2021 (5 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Real power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially if overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores17448
Core clock speed450 MHz300 MHz
Boost clock speed450 MHz1900 MHz
Number of transistors190 million9,800 million
Manufacturing process technology130 nm7 nm
Power consumption (TDP)89 Watt45 Watt
Texture fill rate5.40053.20
Floating-point processing powerno data1.702 TFLOPS
ROPs88
TMUs1228

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizelargeno data
InterfacePCIe 1.0 x16IGP
Supplementary power connectorsNoneNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR3System Shared
Maximum RAM amount256 MBSystem Shared
Memory bus width256 BitSystem Shared
Memory clock speed600 MHzSystem Shared
Memory bandwidth38.4 GB/sno data
Shared memory-+

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsPortable Device DependentNo outputs

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX9.0c (9_3)12 (12_1)
Shader Model3.06.4
OpenGL2.0 (full) 2.1 (partial)4.6
OpenCLN/A2.1
VulkanN/A1.2

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD1−2
−2100%
22
+2100%
1440p1−2
−2700%
28
+2700%
4K0−118

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low

Cyberpunk 2077 1−2
−1700%
18
+1700%

Full HD
Medium

Cyberpunk 2077 1−2
−1300%
14
+1300%
Forza Horizon 4 4−5
−825%
37
+825%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 7−8
−257%
24−27
+257%
Valorant 24−27
−185%
70−75
+185%

Full HD
High

Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 14−16
−314%
58
+314%
Cyberpunk 2077 1−2
−900%
10
+900%
Dota 2 10−11
−1900%
200−210
+1900%
Forza Horizon 4 4−5
−775%
35
+775%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 7−8
−229%
23
+229%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 5−6
−260%
18
+260%
Valorant 24−27
−181%
73
+181%

Full HD
Ultra

Cyberpunk 2077 1−2
−800%
9
+800%
Dota 2 10−11
−1900%
200−210
+1900%
Forza Horizon 4 4−5
−575%
27
+575%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 7−8
−257%
24−27
+257%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 5−6
−160%
13
+160%
Valorant 24−27
+4%
25
−4%

1440p
High

Counter-Strike 2 3−4
−333%
12−14
+333%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 0−1 50−55
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 4−5
−900%
40−45
+900%

1440p
Ultra

Forza Horizon 4 1−2
−1500%
16−18
+1500%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 1−2
−800%
9−10
+800%

4K
High

Grand Theft Auto V 14−16
−21.4%
16−18
+21.4%
Valorant 2−3
−1150%
25
+1150%

4K
Ultra

PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 1−2
−600%
7−8
+600%

4K
Epic

Fortnite 2−3
−250%
7−8
+250%

Full HD
Low

Counter-Strike 2 30−35
+0%
30−35
+0%
Resident Evil 4 Remake 12−14
+0%
12−14
+0%

Full HD
Medium

Battlefield 5 28
+0%
28
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 30−35
+0%
30−35
+0%
Far Cry 5 20
+0%
20
+0%
Fortnite 63
+0%
63
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 24
+0%
24
+0%

Full HD
High

Battlefield 5 23
+0%
23
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 30−35
+0%
30−35
+0%
Far Cry 5 18
+0%
18
+0%
Fortnite 27
+0%
27
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 21
+0%
21
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 17
+0%
17
+0%
Metro Exodus 13
+0%
13
+0%

Full HD
Ultra

Battlefield 5 21
+0%
21
+0%
Far Cry 5 18
+0%
18
+0%

Full HD
Epic

Fortnite 14
+0%
14
+0%

1440p
High

Grand Theft Auto V 7−8
+0%
7−8
+0%
Metro Exodus 6−7
+0%
6−7
+0%
Valorant 48
+0%
48
+0%

1440p
Ultra

Battlefield 5 12−14
+0%
12−14
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 5−6
+0%
5−6
+0%
Far Cry 5 14−16
+0%
14−16
+0%

1440p
Epic

Fortnite 14−16
+0%
14−16
+0%

4K
High

Counter-Strike 2 0−1 0−1
Metro Exodus 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 5−6
+0%
5−6
+0%

4K
Ultra

Battlefield 5 6−7
+0%
6−7
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 0−1 0−1
Cyberpunk 2077 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%
Far Cry 5 6−7
+0%
6−7
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 10−12
+0%
10−12
+0%

This is how Go 6800 Ultra and Vega 7 compete in popular games:

  • Vega 7 is 2100% faster in 1080p
  • Vega 7 is 2700% faster in 1440p

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in Valorant, with 1080p resolution and the Ultra Preset, the Go 6800 Ultra is 4% faster.
  • in Cyberpunk 2077, with 1080p resolution and the Low Preset, the Vega 7 is 1700% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

  • Go 6800 Ultra performs better in 1 test (2%)
  • Vega 7 performs better in 23 tests (43%)
  • there's a draw in 30 tests (56%)

Pros & cons summary

Performance score 0.33 6.73
Recency 24 February 2005 13 April 2021
Chip lithography 130 nm 7 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 89 Watt 45 Watt

Vega 7 has a 1939% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 16 years, a 1757% more advanced lithography process, and 98% lower power consumption.

The Radeon Vega 7 is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce Go 6800 Ultra in performance tests.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Go 6800 Ultra GeForce Go 6800 Ultra
vs
ATI Mobility HD 4570 Mobility Radeon HD 4570
Vega 7 Radeon Vega 7
vs
GeForce MX350 GeForce MX350
Go 6800 Ultra GeForce Go 6800 Ultra
vs
ATI Mobility HD 3650 Mobility Radeon HD 3650
Go 6800 Ultra GeForce Go 6800 Ultra
vs
ATI HD 2400 PRO AGP Radeon HD 2400 PRO AGP
Go 6800 Ultra GeForce Go 6800 Ultra
vs
GeForce 6500 GeForce 6500
Go 6800 Ultra GeForce Go 6800 Ultra
vs
FX 5600 Ultra GeForce FX 5600 Ultra
Go 6800 Ultra GeForce Go 6800 Ultra
vs
Tesla V100 DGXS Tesla V100 DGXS
Go 6800 Ultra GeForce Go 6800 Ultra
vs
GTX 1050 3 GB GeForce GTX 1050 3 GB
Go 6800 Ultra GeForce Go 6800 Ultra
vs
RTX A4500 RTX A4500
Go 7800 GeForce Go 7800
vs
ATI 9800 XXL Radeon 9800 XXL
Go 7800 GeForce Go 7800
vs
ATI 3D Rage IIC AGP 3D Rage IIC AGP
Go 7800 GeForce Go 7800
vs
ATI 3D Rage 3D Rage
Go 7800 GeForce Go 7800
vs
FX 5600 GeForce FX 5600

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.

4 4 votes

Rate GeForce Go 6800 Ultra on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.7 3446 votes

Rate Radeon Vega 7 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about GeForce Go 6800 Ultra or Radeon Vega 7, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.