Arc A770M vs GeForce Go 6400

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared GeForce Go 6400 and Arc A770M, covering specs and all relevant benchmarks.

Go 6400
2006
32 MB DDR
0.05

A770M outperforms 6400 by a whopping 53500% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1529227
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiencyno data18.00
ArchitectureCurie (2003−2013)Generation 12.7 (2022−2023)
GPU code nameNV44 A2DG2-512
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
Release date1 February 2006 (19 years ago)2022 (3 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores74096
Core clock speed400 MHz1650 MHz
Boost clock speed400 MHz2050 MHz
Number of transistors75 million21,700 million
Manufacturing process technology110 nm6 nm
Power consumption (TDP)no data120 Watt
Texture fill rate1.600524.8
Floating-point processing powerno data16.79 TFLOPS
ROPs2128
TMUs4256
Tensor Coresno data512
Ray Tracing Coresno data32
L1 Cacheno data6 MB
L2 Cacheno data16 MB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizeno datalarge
InterfacePCIe 1.0 x16PCIe 4.0 x16

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDRGDDR6
Maximum RAM amount32 MB16 GB
Memory bus width64 Bit256 Bit
Memory clock speed350 MHz2000 MHz
Memory bandwidth5.6 GB/s512.0 GB/s
Shared memory--
Resizable BAR-+

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsPortable Device Dependent

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX9.0c (9_3)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model3.06.6
OpenGL2.14.6
OpenCLN/A3.0
VulkanN/A1.3
DLSS-+

Synthetic benchmarks

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score.

Go 6400 0.05
Arc A770M 26.80
+53500%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Go 6400 24
Samples: 4
Arc A770M 11850
+49275%
Samples: 145

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD-0−185
1440p-0−153
4K-0−137

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low

Cyberpunk 2077 0−1 113
Hogwarts Legacy 5−6
−940%
52
+940%

Full HD
Medium

Cyberpunk 2077 0−1 95
Forza Horizon 4 3−4
−3667%
110−120
+3667%
Hogwarts Legacy 5−6
−960%
53
+960%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 7−8
−1543%
110−120
+1543%
Valorant 24−27
−675%
180−190
+675%

Full HD
High

Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 9−10
−2922%
270−280
+2922%
Cyberpunk 2077 0−1 77
Dota 2 8−9
−1550%
130−140
+1550%
Forza Horizon 4 3−4
−3667%
110−120
+3667%
Hogwarts Legacy 5−6
−1000%
55
+1000%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 7−8
−1543%
110−120
+1543%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 4−5
−4225%
173
+4225%
Valorant 24−27
−675%
180−190
+675%

Full HD
Ultra

Cyberpunk 2077 0−1 67
Dota 2 8−9
−1550%
130−140
+1550%
Forza Horizon 4 3−4
−3667%
110−120
+3667%
Hogwarts Legacy 5−6
−940%
52
+940%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 7−8
−1543%
110−120
+1543%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 4−5
−1175%
51
+1175%
Valorant 24−27
−675%
180−190
+675%

1440p
High

Counter-Strike 2 2−3
−3850%
79
+3850%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 1−2
−17400%
170−180
+17400%

1440p
Ultra

Forza Horizon 4 1−2
−7500%
75−80
+7500%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 0−1 45−50

4K
High

Grand Theft Auto V 14−16
−200%
45
+200%
Valorant 1−2
−17200%
170−180
+17200%

4K
Ultra

PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 1−2
−3200%
30−35
+3200%

4K
Epic

Fortnite 2−3
−1550%
30−35
+1550%

Full HD
Low

Counter-Strike 2 160−170
+0%
160−170
+0%

Full HD
Medium

Battlefield 5 100−110
+0%
100−110
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 160−170
+0%
160−170
+0%
Far Cry 5 106
+0%
106
+0%
Fortnite 130−140
+0%
130−140
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 90−95
+0%
90−95
+0%

Full HD
High

Battlefield 5 100−110
+0%
100−110
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 160−170
+0%
160−170
+0%
Far Cry 5 99
+0%
99
+0%
Fortnite 130−140
+0%
130−140
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 90−95
+0%
90−95
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 86
+0%
86
+0%
Metro Exodus 93
+0%
93
+0%

Full HD
Ultra

Battlefield 5 100−110
+0%
100−110
+0%
Far Cry 5 95
+0%
95
+0%

Full HD
Epic

Fortnite 130−140
+0%
130−140
+0%

1440p
High

Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 200−210
+0%
200−210
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 55−60
+0%
55−60
+0%
Metro Exodus 57
+0%
57
+0%
Valorant 220−230
+0%
220−230
+0%

1440p
Ultra

Battlefield 5 75−80
+0%
75−80
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 44
+0%
44
+0%
Far Cry 5 81
+0%
81
+0%
Hogwarts Legacy 39
+0%
39
+0%

1440p
Epic

Fortnite 70−75
+0%
70−75
+0%

4K
High

Counter-Strike 2 30−33
+0%
30−33
+0%
Hogwarts Legacy 18−20
+0%
18−20
+0%
Metro Exodus 37
+0%
37
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 62
+0%
62
+0%

4K
Ultra

Battlefield 5 45−50
+0%
45−50
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 30−33
+0%
30−33
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 22
+0%
22
+0%
Dota 2 90−95
+0%
90−95
+0%
Far Cry 5 45
+0%
45
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 50−55
+0%
50−55
+0%
Hogwarts Legacy 22
+0%
22
+0%

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS, with 1440p resolution and the High Preset, the Arc A770M is 17400% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

  • Arc A770M performs better in 25 tests (41%)
  • there's a draw in 36 tests (59%)

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.05 26.80
Maximum RAM amount 32 MB 16 GB
Chip lithography 110 nm 6 nm

Arc A770M has a 53500% higher aggregate performance score, a 51100% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 1733.3% more advanced lithography process.

The Arc A770M is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce Go 6400 in performance tests.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce Go 6400
GeForce Go 6400
Intel Arc A770M
Arc A770M

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


2.3 3 votes

Rate GeForce Go 6400 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4 93 votes

Rate Arc A770M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about GeForce Go 6400 or Arc A770M, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.