Graphics 4-Cores iGPU (Arc) vs GeForce Go 6200

Place in the ranking	1531	481
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Power efficiency	0.19	no data
Architecture	Curie (2003−2013)	Xe LPG (2023)
GPU code name	NV44 A2	Meteor Lake iGPU
Market segment	Laptop	Laptop
Release date	1 February 2006 (19 years ago)	14 December 2023 (1 year ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	7	4
Core clock speed	300 MHz	no data
Boost clock speed	300 MHz	1950 MHz
Number of transistors	75 million	no data
Manufacturing process technology	110 nm	5 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	16 Watt	no data
Texture fill rate	1.200	no data
ROPs	2	no data
TMUs	4	no data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Interface

PCIe 1.0 x16

no data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	DDR	no data
Maximum RAM amount	32 MB	no data
Memory bus width	64 Bit	no data
Memory clock speed	300 MHz	no data
Memory bandwidth	4.8 GB/s	no data
Shared memory	-	+

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors

No outputs

no data

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	9.0c (9_3)	12_2
Shader Model	3.0	no data
OpenGL	2.1	no data
OpenCL	N/A	no data
Vulkan	N/A	-

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD

-0−1

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077	0−1	0−1
God of War	4−5 −22400%	900−950 +22400%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Cyberpunk 2077	0−1	0−1
Forza Horizon 4	2−3 −2400%	50 +2400%
God of War	4−5 −375%	18−20 +375%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	6−7 −483%	35−40 +483%
Valorant	21−24 −300%	90−95 +300%

Full HD
High Preset

Counter-Strike: Global Offensive	9−10 −23233%	2100−2150 +23233%
Cyberpunk 2077	0−1	20−22
Dota 2	7−8 −23471%	1650−1700 +23471%
Forza Horizon 4	2−3 −1850%	39 +1850%
God of War	4−5 −375%	18−20 +375%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	6−7 −483%	35−40 +483%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	5−6 −400%	24−27 +400%
Valorant	21−24 −300%	90−95 +300%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Cyberpunk 2077	0−1	20−22
Dota 2	7−8 −23471%	1650−1700 +23471%
Forza Horizon 4	2−3 −1400%	30 +1400%
God of War	4−5 −375%	18−20 +375%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	6−7 −483%	35−40 +483%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	5−6 −22900%	1150−1200 +22900%
Valorant	21−24 −300%	90−95 +300%

1440p
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2	2−3 −22400%	450−500 +22400%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	0−1	45−50

1440p
Ultra Preset

Forza Horizon 4

1−2

−2200%

21−24
+2200%

4K
High Preset

Grand Theft Auto V	14−16 −40%	21−24 +40%
Valorant	1−2 −22900%	230−240 +22900%

4K
Ultra Preset

PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS

1−2

−800%

9−10
+800%

4K
Epic Preset

Fortnite

1−2

−22900%

230−240
+22900%

Full HD
Low Preset

Counter-Strike 2

+0%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Battlefield 5	40−45 +0%	40−45 +0%
Counter-Strike 2	11 +0%	11 +0%
Far Cry 5	30−35 +0%	30−35 +0%
Forza Horizon 5	27−30 +0%	27−30 +0%

Full HD
High Preset

Battlefield 5	40−45 +0%	40−45 +0%
Counter-Strike 2	13 +0%	13 +0%
Far Cry 5	24 +0%	24 +0%
Fortnite	55−60 +0%	55−60 +0%
Forza Horizon 5	27−30 +0%	27−30 +0%
Grand Theft Auto V	15 +0%	15 +0%
Metro Exodus	18−20 +0%	18−20 +0%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5	40−45 +0%	40−45 +0%
Counter-Strike 2	50−55 +0%	50−55 +0%
Far Cry 5	30−35 +0%	30−35 +0%
Fortnite	55−60 +0%	55−60 +0%
Forza Horizon 5	27−30 +0%	27−30 +0%

1440p
High Preset

Counter-Strike: Global Offensive	70−75 +0%	70−75 +0%
Cyberpunk 2077	8−9 +0%	8−9 +0%
Grand Theft Auto V	14−16 +0%	14−16 +0%
Metro Exodus	10−12 +0%	10−12 +0%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5	24−27 +0%	24−27 +0%
Counter-Strike 2	18−20 +0%	18−20 +0%
Far Cry 5	20−22 +0%	20−22 +0%
Forza Horizon 5	10−11 +0%	10−11 +0%
God of War	10−11 +0%	10−11 +0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	12−14 +0%	12−14 +0%
Valorant	100−110 +0%	100−110 +0%

4K
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2	4−5 +0%	4−5 +0%
Cyberpunk 2077	3−4 +0%	3−4 +0%
Metro Exodus	5−6 +0%	5−6 +0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	10−11 +0%	10−11 +0%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5	12−14 +0%	12−14 +0%
Counter-Strike 2	4−5 +0%	4−5 +0%
Far Cry 5	9−10 +0%	9−10 +0%
Fortnite	9−10 +0%	9−10 +0%
Forza Horizon 4	16−18 +0%	16−18 +0%
Forza Horizon 5	7−8 +0%	7−8 +0%
God of War	7−8 +0%	7−8 +0%
Valorant	50−55 +0%	50−55 +0%

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

in Forza Horizon 4, with 1080p resolution and the Medium Preset, the Graphics 4-Cores iGPU (Arc) is 2400% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

Graphics 4-Cores iGPU (Arc) performs better in 16 tests (29%)
there's a draw in 40 tests (71%)

Pros & cons summary

Performance score	0.04	9.47
Recency	1 February 2006	14 December 2023
Chip lithography	110 nm	5 nm

Graphics 4-Cores iGPU (Arc) has a 23575% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 17 years, and a 2100% more advanced lithography process.

The Graphics 4-Cores iGPU (Arc) is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce Go 6200 in performance tests.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.

GeForce Go 6200

Graphics 4-Cores iGPU (Arc)

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

GeForce Go 6200

Radeon Xpress 200M

Graphics 4 Cores iGPU (Arc)

Iris Xe Graphics G7

GeForce Go 6200

Radeon RX 490M

M4 8 core GPU

Mobility FireGL V5000

Xbox 360 GPU

Mobility Radeon HD 2400 XT

HD 6330M

Graphics Media Accelerator (GMA) HD Graphics

G100 OEM

Graphics Media Accelerator (GMA) HD Graphics

R2 Graphics

Graphics Media Accelerator (GMA) 4700MHD

Mobility Radeon HD 4200 IGP

Graphics Media Accelerator (GMA) 3650

PCX 4300

Mobility Radeon 9100 IGP

R9 M360

Pro WX 7100

GTX 1050 3 GB Max-Q

RX 580 Mobile

Tesla P4

RX 550 Mobile

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.

3.2 6 votes

Rate GeForce Go 6200 on a scale of 1 to 5:

2.7 14 votes

Rate Graphics 4-Cores iGPU (Arc) on a scale of 1 to 5:

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about GeForce Go 6200 or Graphics 4-Cores iGPU (Arc), agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.