GeForce 7200 GS vs Go 6200

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared GeForce Go 6200 with GeForce 7200 GS, including specs and performance data.

Go 6200
2006
32 MB DDR, 16 Watt
0.04

7200 GS outperforms Go 6200 by an impressive 50% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking15541543
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency0.19no data
ArchitectureCurie (2003−2013)Curie (2003−2013)
GPU code nameNV44 A2G72
Market segmentLaptopDesktop
Release date1 February 2006 (20 years ago)18 January 2006 (20 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores7no data
Core clock speed300 MHz450 MHz
Boost clock speed300 MHzno data
Number of transistors75 million112 million
Manufacturing process technology110 nm90 nm
Power consumption (TDP)16 Wattno data
Texture fill rate1.2001.800
ROPs22
TMUs44

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 1.0 x16PCIe 1.0 x16
Widthno data1-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno dataNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDRDDR2
Maximum RAM amount32 MB128 MB
Memory bus width64 Bit64 Bit
Memory clock speed300 MHz334 MHz
Memory bandwidth4.8 GB/s5.344 GB/s
Shared memory-no data

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputs1x DVI, 1x VGA, 1x S-Video

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX9.0c (9_3)9.0c (9_3)
Shader Model3.03.0
OpenGL2.12.1
OpenCLN/AN/A
VulkanN/AN/A

Synthetic benchmarks

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score.

Go 6200 0.04
7200 GS 0.06
+50%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Go 6200 15
Samples: 18
7200 GS 23
+53.3%
Samples: 1

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low

Cyberpunk 2077 0−1 0−1
Hogwarts Legacy 5−6
−40%
7−8
+40%

Full HD
Medium

Cyberpunk 2077 0−1 0−1
Forza Horizon 4 2−3
−50%
3−4
+50%
Hogwarts Legacy 5−6
−40%
7−8
+40%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 7−8
−42.9%
10−11
+42.9%
Valorant 24−27
−45.8%
35−40
+45.8%

Full HD
High

Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 9−10
−33.3%
12−14
+33.3%
Cyberpunk 2077 0−1 0−1
Dota 2 7−8
−42.9%
10−11
+42.9%
Forza Horizon 4 2−3
−50%
3−4
+50%
Hogwarts Legacy 5−6
−40%
7−8
+40%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 7−8
−42.9%
10−11
+42.9%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 4−5
−50%
6−7
+50%
Valorant 24−27
−45.8%
35−40
+45.8%

Full HD
Ultra

Cyberpunk 2077 0−1 0−1
Dota 2 7−8
−42.9%
10−11
+42.9%
Forza Horizon 4 2−3
−50%
3−4
+50%
Hogwarts Legacy 5−6
−40%
7−8
+40%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 7−8
−42.9%
10−11
+42.9%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 4−5
−50%
6−7
+50%
Valorant 24−27
−45.8%
35−40
+45.8%

1440p
High

Counter-Strike 2 2−3
−50%
3−4
+50%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 0−1 0−1

1440p
Ultra

Forza Horizon 4 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%

4K
High

Grand Theft Auto V 14−16
−50%
21−24
+50%
Valorant 0−1 0−1

4K
Ultra

PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%

4K
Epic

Fortnite 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.04 0.06
Maximum RAM amount 32 MB 128 MB
Chip lithography 110 nm 90 nm

7200 GS has a 50% higher aggregate performance score, a 300% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 22.2% more advanced lithography process.

The GeForce 7200 GS is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce Go 6200 in performance tests.

Be aware that GeForce Go 6200 is a notebook graphics card while GeForce 7200 GS is a desktop one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce Go 6200
GeForce Go 6200
NVIDIA GeForce 7200 GS
GeForce 7200 GS

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.4 7 votes

Rate GeForce Go 6200 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.6 85 votes

Rate GeForce 7200 GS on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about GeForce Go 6200 or GeForce 7200 GS, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.