HD Graphics P4600 vs GeForce Go 6150

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared GeForce Go 6150 with HD Graphics P4600, including specs and performance data.

Go 6150
2006
0.05

HD Graphics P4600 outperforms Go 6150 by a whopping 2800% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking15491035
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiencyno data1.33
Architectureno dataGeneration 7.5 (2013)
GPU code nameC51MVHaswell GT2
Market segmentLaptopDesktop
Release date1 February 2006 (20 years ago)1 June 2013 (12 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores3160
Core clock speed1 MHz350 MHz
Boost clock speed425 MHz1200 MHz
Number of transistorsno data392 million
Manufacturing process technology110 nm22 nm
Power consumption (TDP)no data84 Watt
Texture fill rateno data24.00
Floating-point processing powerno data0.384 TFLOPS
ROPsno data2
TMUsno data20

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Interfaceno dataIGP
Widthno dataIGP

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeshared MemorySystem Shared
Maximum RAM amountno dataSystem Shared
Memory bus widthno dataSystem Shared
Memory clock speedno dataSystem Shared
Shared memory++

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectorsno dataNo outputs

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectXshared Memory12 (11_1)
Shader Modelno data5.1
OpenGLno data4.3
OpenCLno data1.2
Vulkan-1.1.80

Synthetic benchmarks

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score.

Go 6150 0.05
HD Graphics P4600 1.45
+2800%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Go 6150 19
Samples: 122
HD Graphics P4600 605
+3084%
Samples: 6

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low

Cyberpunk 2077 0−1 0−1

Full HD
Medium

Cyberpunk 2077 0−1 0−1
Forza Horizon 4 2−3
−2650%
55−60
+2650%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 6−7
−2733%
170−180
+2733%
Valorant 24−27
−2608%
650−700
+2608%

Full HD
High

Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 9−10
−2789%
260−270
+2789%
Cyberpunk 2077 0−1 0−1
Dota 2 7−8
−2757%
200−210
+2757%
Forza Horizon 4 2−3
−2650%
55−60
+2650%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 6−7
−2733%
170−180
+2733%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 4−5
−2650%
110−120
+2650%
Valorant 24−27
−2608%
650−700
+2608%

Full HD
Ultra

Cyberpunk 2077 0−1 0−1
Dota 2 7−8
−2757%
200−210
+2757%
Forza Horizon 4 2−3
−2650%
55−60
+2650%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 6−7
−2733%
170−180
+2733%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 4−5
−2650%
110−120
+2650%
Valorant 24−27
−2608%
650−700
+2608%

1440p
High

Counter-Strike 2 2−3
−2650%
55−60
+2650%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 1−2
−2600%
27−30
+2600%

1440p
Ultra

Forza Horizon 4 1−2
−2600%
27−30
+2600%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 1−2
−2600%
27−30
+2600%

4K
High

Grand Theft Auto V 14−16
−2757%
400−450
+2757%
Valorant 0−1 0−1

4K
Ultra

PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 1−2
−2600%
27−30
+2600%

4K
Epic

Fortnite 1−2
−2600%
27−30
+2600%

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.05 1.45
Recency 1 February 2006 1 June 2013
Chip lithography 110 nm 22 nm

HD Graphics P4600 has a 2800% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 7 years, and a 400% more advanced lithography process.

The HD Graphics P4600 is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce Go 6150 in performance tests.

Be aware that GeForce Go 6150 is a notebook graphics card while HD Graphics P4600 is a desktop one.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


1.7 11 votes

Rate GeForce Go 6150 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.1 51 votes

Rate HD Graphics P4600 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about GeForce Go 6150 or HD Graphics P4600, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.