UHD Graphics 770 vs GeForce Go 6100

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared GeForce Go 6100 with UHD Graphics 770, including specs and performance data.

Go 6100
2006
0.04

Graphics 770 outperforms Go 6100 by a whopping 13325% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1541638
Place by popularitynot in top-10089
Power efficiencyno data28.92
Architectureno dataGeneration 12.2 (2022−2023)
GPU code nameC51MVRaptor Lake GT1
Market segmentLaptopDesktop
Release date1 February 2006 (19 years ago)27 September 2022 (3 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores3256
Core clock speed1 MHz300 MHz
Boost clock speed425 MHz1650 MHz
Manufacturing process technology110 nm10 nm
Power consumption (TDP)no data15 Watt
Texture fill rateno data26.40
Floating-point processing powerno data0.8448 TFLOPS
ROPsno data8
TMUsno data16

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Interfaceno dataRing Bus
Widthno dataIGP

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeshared MemorySystem Shared
Maximum RAM amountno dataSystem Shared
Memory bus widthno dataSystem Shared
Memory clock speedno dataSystem Shared
Shared memory++

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectorsno dataMotherboard Dependent

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectXshared Memory12 (12_1)
Shader Modelno data6.6
OpenGLno data4.6
OpenCLno data3.0
Vulkan-1.3

Synthetic benchmarks

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score.

Go 6100 0.04
UHD Graphics 770 5.37
+13325%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Go 6100 17
Samples: 88
UHD Graphics 770 790
+4547%
Samples: 2

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD-0−118
4K-0−113

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low

Cyberpunk 2077 0−1 11
Hogwarts Legacy 5−6
−120%
11
+120%

Full HD
Medium

Cyberpunk 2077 0−1 10
Forza Horizon 4 3−4
−767%
24−27
+767%
Hogwarts Legacy 5−6
−120%
10−12
+120%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 7−8
−214%
21−24
+214%
Valorant 24−27
−179%
65−70
+179%

Full HD
High

Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 9−10
−967%
95−100
+967%
Cyberpunk 2077 0−1 12−14
Dota 2 7−8
−514%
43
+514%
Forza Horizon 4 3−4
−767%
24−27
+767%
Hogwarts Legacy 5−6
−120%
10−12
+120%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 7−8
−214%
21−24
+214%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 4−5
−350%
18
+350%
Valorant 24−27
−179%
65−70
+179%

Full HD
Ultra

Cyberpunk 2077 0−1 12−14
Dota 2 7−8
−471%
40
+471%
Forza Horizon 4 3−4
−767%
24−27
+767%
Hogwarts Legacy 5−6
−120%
10−12
+120%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 7−8
−214%
21−24
+214%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 4−5
−125%
9
+125%
Valorant 24−27
−179%
65−70
+179%

1440p
High

Counter-Strike 2 2−3
−450%
10−12
+450%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 0−1 35−40

1440p
Ultra

Forza Horizon 4 1−2
−1300%
14−16
+1300%

4K
High

Grand Theft Auto V 14−16
−13.3%
16−18
+13.3%
Valorant 1−2
−2800%
27−30
+2800%

4K
Ultra

PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 1−2
−500%
6−7
+500%

4K
Epic

Fortnite 2−3
−200%
6−7
+200%

Full HD
Low

Counter-Strike 2 52
+0%
52
+0%

Full HD
Medium

Battlefield 5 24−27
+0%
24−27
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 34
+0%
34
+0%
Far Cry 5 17
+0%
17
+0%
Fortnite 35−40
+0%
35−40
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 18
+0%
18
+0%

Full HD
High

Battlefield 5 24−27
+0%
24−27
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 9
+0%
9
+0%
Far Cry 5 16
+0%
16
+0%
Fortnite 35−40
+0%
35−40
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 16
+0%
16
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 9
+0%
9
+0%
Metro Exodus 5
+0%
5
+0%

Full HD
Ultra

Battlefield 5 24−27
+0%
24−27
+0%
Far Cry 5 14
+0%
14
+0%

Full HD
Epic

Fortnite 35−40
+0%
35−40
+0%

1440p
High

Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 40−45
+0%
40−45
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 6−7
+0%
6−7
+0%
Metro Exodus 5−6
+0%
5−6
+0%
Valorant 60−65
+0%
60−65
+0%

1440p
Ultra

Battlefield 5 8−9
+0%
8−9
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 4−5
+0%
4−5
+0%
Far Cry 5 10−12
+0%
10−12
+0%
Hogwarts Legacy 6−7
+0%
6−7
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 8−9
+0%
8−9
+0%

1440p
Epic

Fortnite 10−12
+0%
10−12
+0%

4K
High

Hogwarts Legacy 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%
Metro Exodus 0−1 0−1
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 3−4
+0%
3−4
+0%

4K
Ultra

Battlefield 5 4−5
+0%
4−5
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%
Dota 2 14
+0%
14
+0%
Far Cry 5 5−6
+0%
5−6
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 8−9
+0%
8−9
+0%
Hogwarts Legacy 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in Valorant, with 4K resolution and the High Preset, the UHD Graphics 770 is 2800% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

  • UHD Graphics 770 performs better in 24 tests (41%)
  • there's a draw in 34 tests (59%)

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.04 5.37
Recency 1 February 2006 27 September 2022
Chip lithography 110 nm 10 nm

UHD Graphics 770 has a 13325% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 16 years, and a 1000% more advanced lithography process.

The UHD Graphics 770 is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce Go 6100 in performance tests.

Be aware that GeForce Go 6100 is a notebook graphics card while UHD Graphics 770 is a desktop one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce Go 6100
GeForce Go 6100
Intel UHD Graphics 770
UHD Graphics 770

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


2.6 19 votes

Rate GeForce Go 6100 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.2 1413 votes

Rate UHD Graphics 770 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about GeForce Go 6100 or UHD Graphics 770, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.