GeForce RTX 3050 A Mobile vs Go 6100

Aggregate performance score

We've compared GeForce Go 6100 and GeForce RTX 3050 A Mobile, covering specs and all relevant benchmarks.

Go 6100
2006
0.04

RTX 3050 A Mobile outperforms Go 6100 by a whopping 69075% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1533228
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiencyno data46.87
Architectureno dataAmpere (2020−2025)
GPU code nameC51MVGA106
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
Release date1 February 2006 (19 years ago)2024 (1 year ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores31792
Core clock speed1 MHz1065 MHz
Boost clock speed425 MHz1343 MHz
Number of transistorsno data12,000 million
Manufacturing process technology110 nm8 nm
Power consumption (TDP)no data45 Watt
Texture fill rateno data75.21
Floating-point processing powerno data4.813 TFLOPS
ROPsno data32
TMUsno data56
Tensor Coresno data56
Ray Tracing Coresno data14

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizeno datamedium sized
Interfaceno dataPCIe 4.0 x8

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeshared MemoryGDDR6
Maximum RAM amountno data4 GB
Memory bus widthno data128 Bit
Memory clock speedno data1500 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data192.0 GB/s
Shared memory+-
Resizable BAR-+

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectorsno dataPortable Device Dependent

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectXshared Memory12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Modelno data6.7
OpenGLno data4.6
OpenCLno data3.0
Vulkan-1.3
CUDA-8.6
DLSS-+

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score.

Go 6100 0.04
RTX 3050 A Mobile 27.67
+69075%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Go 6100 17
RTX 3050 A Mobile 11595
+68106%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 0−1 0−1
Hogwarts Legacy 5−6
−68900%
3450−3500
+68900%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 0−1 0−1
Forza Horizon 4 2−3
−67400%
1350−1400
+67400%
Hogwarts Legacy 5−6
−68900%
3450−3500
+68900%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 6−7
−69067%
4150−4200
+69067%
Valorant 21−24
−69030%
15900−15950
+69030%

Full HD
High Preset

Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 9−10
−68789%
6200−6250
+68789%
Cyberpunk 2077 0−1 0−1
Dota 2 7−8
−68471%
4800−4850
+68471%
Forza Horizon 4 2−3
−67400%
1350−1400
+67400%
Hogwarts Legacy 5−6
−68900%
3450−3500
+68900%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 6−7
−69067%
4150−4200
+69067%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 5−6
−68900%
3450−3500
+68900%
Valorant 21−24
−69030%
15900−15950
+69030%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 0−1 0−1
Dota 2 7−8
−68471%
4800−4850
+68471%
Forza Horizon 4 2−3
−67400%
1350−1400
+67400%
Hogwarts Legacy 5−6
−68900%
3450−3500
+68900%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 6−7
−69067%
4150−4200
+69067%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 5−6
−68900%
3450−3500
+68900%
Valorant 21−24
−69030%
15900−15950
+69030%

1440p
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 2−3
−67400%
1350−1400
+67400%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 0−1 0−1

1440p
Ultra Preset

Forza Horizon 4 1−2
−64900%
650−700
+64900%

4K
High Preset

Grand Theft Auto V 14−16
−68900%
10350−10400
+68900%
Valorant 1−2
−64900%
650−700
+64900%

4K
Ultra Preset

PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 1−2
−64900%
650−700
+64900%

4K
Epic Preset

Fortnite 1−2
−64900%
650−700
+64900%

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.04 27.67
Chip lithography 110 nm 8 nm

RTX 3050 A Mobile has a 69075% higher aggregate performance score, and a 1275% more advanced lithography process.

The GeForce RTX 3050 A Mobile is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce Go 6100 in performance tests.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce Go 6100
GeForce Go 6100
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 A Mobile
GeForce RTX 3050 A Mobile

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


2.6 19 votes

Rate GeForce Go 6100 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.4 25 votes

Rate GeForce RTX 3050 A Mobile on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about GeForce Go 6100 or GeForce RTX 3050 A Mobile, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.