Radeon R7 370 vs GeForce GTX TITAN

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
GT 640 GT 740 GTX 650 GTX 650 Ti GTX 660 GTX 660 Ti GTX 670 GTX 680 GTX 760 GTX 770 GTX 780 GTX 780 Ti
VS
#ad 
Buy on Amazon
340 OEM 350 350 640SP 350 Fake Card 350 OEM 350X OEM 360 360 896SP 360E 370 384 Cores (Kaveri Desktop)

Aggregate performance score

We've compared GeForce GTX TITAN and Radeon R7 370, covering specs and all relevant benchmarks.

GTX TITAN
2013, $999
6 GB GDDR5, 250 Watt
19.31
+82.5%

TITAN outperforms R7 370 by an impressive 83% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Contents

Share:
GTX TITAN GTX TITAN
R7 370 R7 370

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking311468
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation2.835.70
Power efficiency6.017.48
ArchitectureKepler (2012−2018)GCN 1.0 (2012−2020)
GPU code nameGK110Trinidad
Market segmentDesktopDesktop
Designno datareference
Release date19 February 2013 (12 years ago)18 June 2015 (10 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$999 $149

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices.

R7 370 has 101% better value for money than GTX TITAN.

Performance to price scatter graph

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores26881024
Core clock speed837 MHzno data
Boost clock speed876 MHz975 MHz
Number of transistors7,080 million2,800 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm28 nm
Power consumption (TDP)250 Watt110 Watt
Texture fill rate196.262.40
Floating-point processing power4.709 TFLOPS1.997 TFLOPS
ROPs4832
TMUs22464
L1 Cache224 KB256 KB
L2 Cache1536 KB512 KB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Bus supportPCI Express 3.0PCIe 3.0
InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCIe 3.0 x16
Length267 mm152 mm
Height4.376" (11.1 cm)no data
Width2-slot2-slot
Supplementary power connectors1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin1 x 6-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount6 GB4 GB
Memory bus width384-bit GDDR5256 Bit
Memory clock speed6.0 GB/s975 MHz
Memory bandwidth288.4 GB/s179.2 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsOne Dual Link DVI-I, One Dual Link DVI-D, One HDMI, One DisplayPort2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort
Multi monitor support4 displaysno data
Eyefinity-+
Number of Eyefinity displaysno data6
HDMI++
HDCP+-
Maximum VGA resolution2048x1536no data
DisplayPort support-+
Audio input for HDMIInternalno data

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

AppAcceleration-+
CrossFire-+
FreeSync-+
TrueAudio-+
VCE-+
DDMA audiono data+
Blu Ray 3D+-
3D Gaming+-
3D Vision+-
3D Vision Live+-

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (11_0)DirectX® 12
Shader Model5.15.1
OpenGL4.44.6
OpenCL1.22.0
Vulkan1.1.126+
Mantle-+
CUDA+-

Synthetic benchmarks

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score.

GTX TITAN 19.31
+82.5%
R7 370 10.58

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

GTX TITAN 8181
+82.5%
Samples: 1268
R7 370 4482
Samples: 4031

3DMark Fire Strike Graphics

Fire Strike is a DirectX 11 benchmark for gaming PCs. It features two separate tests displaying a fight between a humanoid and a fiery creature made of lava. Using 1920x1080 resolution, Fire Strike shows off some realistic graphics and is quite taxing on hardware.

GTX TITAN 10470
+75.6%
R7 370 5961

Unigine Heaven 4.0

This is an old DirectX 11 benchmark, a newer version of Unigine 3.0 with relatively small differences. It displays a fantasy medieval town sprawling over several flying islands. The benchmark is still sometimes used, despite its significant age, as it was released back in 2013.

GTX TITAN 1783
+154%
R7 370 702

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD80−85
+73.9%
46
−73.9%
1440p100−110
+75.4%
57
−75.4%
4K35−40
+75%
20
−75%

Cost per frame, $

1080p12.49
−286%
3.24
+286%
1440p9.99
−282%
2.61
+282%
4K28.54
−283%
7.45
+283%
  • R7 370 has 286% lower cost per frame in 1080p
  • R7 370 has 282% lower cost per frame in 1440p
  • R7 370 has 283% lower cost per frame in 4K

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low

Counter-Strike 2 55−60
+0%
55−60
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 21−24
+0%
21−24
+0%

Full HD
Medium

Battlefield 5 45−50
+0%
45−50
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 55−60
+0%
55−60
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 21−24
+0%
21−24
+0%
Escape from Tarkov 40−45
+0%
40−45
+0%
Far Cry 5 35−40
+0%
35−40
+0%
Fortnite 106
+0%
106
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 45−50
+0%
45−50
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 30−35
+0%
30−35
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 38
+0%
38
+0%
Valorant 100−105
+0%
100−105
+0%

Full HD
High

Battlefield 5 45−50
+0%
45−50
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 55−60
+0%
55−60
+0%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 150−160
+0%
150−160
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 21−24
+0%
21−24
+0%
Dota 2 75−80
+0%
75−80
+0%
Escape from Tarkov 42
+0%
42
+0%
Far Cry 5 35−40
+0%
35−40
+0%
Fortnite 41
+0%
41
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 45−50
+0%
45−50
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 30−35
+0%
30−35
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 44
+0%
44
+0%
Metro Exodus 21−24
+0%
21−24
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 30
+0%
30
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 35
+0%
35
+0%
Valorant 100−105
+0%
100−105
+0%

Full HD
Ultra

Battlefield 5 45−50
+0%
45−50
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 21−24
+0%
21−24
+0%
Dota 2 75−80
+0%
75−80
+0%
Escape from Tarkov 32
+0%
32
+0%
Far Cry 5 35−40
+0%
35−40
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 45−50
+0%
45−50
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 35−40
+0%
35−40
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 22
+0%
22
+0%
Valorant 20
+0%
20
+0%

Full HD
Epic

Fortnite 30
+0%
30
+0%

1440p
High

Counter-Strike 2 20−22
+0%
20−22
+0%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 81
+0%
81
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 16−18
+0%
16−18
+0%
Metro Exodus 12−14
+0%
12−14
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 60−65
+0%
60−65
+0%
Valorant 110−120
+0%
110−120
+0%

1440p
Ultra

Battlefield 5 27−30
+0%
27−30
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 9−10
+0%
9−10
+0%
Escape from Tarkov 21−24
+0%
21−24
+0%
Far Cry 5 21−24
+0%
21−24
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 24−27
+0%
24−27
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 14−16
+0%
14−16
+0%

1440p
Epic

Fortnite 21−24
+0%
21−24
+0%

4K
High

Counter-Strike 2 6−7
+0%
6−7
+0%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 45
+0%
45
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 21−24
+0%
21−24
+0%
Metro Exodus 7−8
+0%
7−8
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 12−14
+0%
12−14
+0%
Valorant 55−60
+0%
55−60
+0%

4K
Ultra

Battlefield 5 14−16
+0%
14−16
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 6−7
+0%
6−7
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 3−4
+0%
3−4
+0%
Dota 2 40−45
+0%
40−45
+0%
Escape from Tarkov 9−10
+0%
9−10
+0%
Far Cry 5 10−12
+0%
10−12
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 18−20
+0%
18−20
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 10−11
+0%
10−11
+0%

4K
Epic

Fortnite 10−11
+0%
10−11
+0%

This is how GTX TITAN and R7 370 compete in popular games:

  • GTX TITAN is 74% faster in 1080p
  • GTX TITAN is 75% faster in 1440p
  • GTX TITAN is 75% faster in 4K

All in all, in popular games:

  • there's a draw in 65 tests (100%)

Pros & cons summary

Performance score 19.31 10.58
Recency 19 February 2013 18 June 2015
Maximum RAM amount 6 GB 4 GB
Power consumption (TDP) 250 Watt 110 Watt

GTX TITAN has a 82.5% higher aggregate performance score, and a 50% higher maximum VRAM amount.

R7 370, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 2 years, and 127.3% lower power consumption.

The GeForce GTX TITAN is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon R7 370 in performance tests.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.

NVIDIA GeForce GTX TITAN
GeForce GTX TITAN
AMD Radeon R7 370
Radeon R7 370
Like
Like

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

GTX TITAN GeForce GTX TITAN
vs
RX 470 Radeon RX 470
R7 370 Radeon R7 370
vs
HD 7870 XT Radeon HD 7870 XT
GTX TITAN GeForce GTX TITAN
vs
R9 290 Radeon R9 290
GTX 645 OEM NVIDIA GTX 645 OEM
vs
FirePro A320 A320
GTX 645 OEM NVIDIA GTX 645 OEM
vs
A10M
GTX 645 OEM NVIDIA 645 OEM
vs
RTX 5060 Ti 5060 Ti
GTX 650 Ti OEM NVIDIA GTX 650 Ti OEM
vs
RTX PRO 5000 Blackwell 5000 Blackwell
GTX 650 Ti Boost NVIDIA GTX 650 Ti Boost
vs
RX 5700 XT 5700 XT
GTX TITAN GeForce GTX TITAN
vs
GTX 560 GeForce GTX 560
GTX TITAN NVIDIA GTX TITAN
vs
GT 440 440
GTX TITAN NVIDIA GTX TITAN
vs
8800 GT 8800 GT
GTX TITAN NVIDIA GTX TITAN
vs
Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs G7 96EUs
GTX TITAN NVIDIA GTX TITAN
vs
RX 6700 6700

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.

3.8 180 votes

Rate GeForce GTX TITAN on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.9 586 votes

Rate Radeon R7 370 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about GeForce GTX TITAN or Radeon R7 370, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.