GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile vs TITAN

Place in performance ranking	239	326
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation	2.80	8.66
Architecture	Kepler (2012−2018)	Pascal (2016−2021)
GPU code name	GK110	GP107
Market segment	Desktop	Laptop
Release date	19 February 2013 (11 years ago)	3 January 2017 (7 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)	$999	no data
Current price	$640 (0.6x MSRP)	$545

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

GTX 1050 Ti Mobile has 209% better value for money than GTX TITAN.

Detailed specifications

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	2688	768
CUDA cores	2688	768
Core clock speed	837 MHz	1493 MHz
Boost clock speed	876 MHz	1620 MHz
Number of transistors	7,080 million	3,300 million
Manufacturing process technology	28 nm	14 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	250 Watt	75 Watt
Maximum GPU temperature	no data	97 °C
Texture fill rate	187.5 billion/sec	77.76
Floating-point performance	4,709 gflops	no data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on GeForce GTX TITAN and GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop video cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility). For notebook video cards it's notebook size, connection slot and bus, if the video card is inserted into a slot instead of being soldered to the notebook motherboard.

Laptop size	no data	large
Bus support	PCI Express 3.0	no data
Interface	PCIe 3.0 x16	PCIe 3.0 x16
Length	10.5" (26.7 cm)	no data
Height	4.376" (11.1 cm)	no data
Width	2-slot	no data
Supplementary power connectors	One 8-pin and one 6-pin	no data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount	6 GB	4 GB
Memory bus width	384-bit GDDR5	128 Bit
Memory clock speed	6.0 GB/s	7 GB/s
Memory bandwidth	288.4 GB/s	112 GB/s
Shared memory	no data	-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors	One Dual Link DVI-I, One Dual Link DVI-D, One HDMI, One DisplayPort	No outputs
Multi monitor support	4 displays	no data
HDMI	+	no data
HDCP	+	no data
Maximum VGA resolution	2048x1536	no data
G-SYNC support	no data	+
Audio input for HDMI	Internal	no data

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Blu Ray 3D	+	no data
3D Gaming	+	no data
3D Vision	+	no data
3D Vision Live	+	no data
Ansel	no data	+

API compatibility

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	12 (11_0)	12 (12_1)
Shader Model	5.1	6.4
OpenGL	4.4	4.6
OpenCL	1.2	1.2
Vulkan	1.1.126	1.2.131
CUDA	+	+

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark performance comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

GTX TITAN 21.20
+38.4%

GTX 1050 Ti Mobile 15.32

TITAN outperforms 1050 Ti Mobile by 38% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark, part of Passmark PerformanceTest suite. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Benchmark coverage: 25%

GTX TITAN 8189
+38.4%

GTX 1050 Ti Mobile 5918

TITAN outperforms 1050 Ti Mobile by 38% in Passmark.

3DMark Fire Strike Graphics

Fire Strike is a DirectX 11 benchmark for gaming PCs. It features two separate tests displaying a fight between a humanoid and a fiery creature made of lava. Using 1920x1080 resolution, Fire Strike shows off some realistic graphics and is quite taxing on hardware.

Benchmark coverage: 14%

GTX TITAN 10470
+35.3%

GTX 1050 Ti Mobile 7741

TITAN outperforms 1050 Ti Mobile by 35% in 3DMark Fire Strike Graphics.

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD	75−80 +33.9%	56 −33.9%
1440p	30−35 +20%	25 −20%
4K	21−24 +23.5%	17 −23.5%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	43 +43.3%	30−33 −43.3%
Battlefield 5	59 +47.5%	40−45 −47.5%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	47 +56.7%	30−33 −56.7%
Far Cry 5	47 +56.7%	30−33 −56.7%
Far Cry New Dawn	46 +53.3%	30−33 −53.3%
Forza Horizon 4	62 +55%	40−45 −55%
Red Dead Redemption 2	33 +57.1%	21−24 −57.1%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	39 +44.4%	27−30 −44.4%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	37 +54.2%	24−27 −54.2%
Battlefield 5	49 +40%	35−40 −40%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	33 +57.1%	21−24 −57.1%
Far Cry 5	44 +46.7%	30−33 −46.7%
Far Cry New Dawn	42 +40%	30−33 −40%
Forza Horizon 4	57 +42.5%	40−45 −42.5%
Metro Exodus	19 +58.3%	12−14 −58.3%
Red Dead Redemption 2	40−45 +43.3%	30−33 −43.3%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	33 +57.1%	21−24 −57.1%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	47 +56.7%	30−33 −56.7%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	23 +43.8%	16−18 −43.8%
Battlefield 5	42 +40%	30−33 −40%
Far Cry 5	40 +48.1%	27−30 −48.1%
Far Cry New Dawn	38 +40.7%	27−30 −40.7%
Forza Horizon 4	43 +43.3%	30−33 −43.3%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	26 +44.4%	18−20 −44.4%

1440p
High Preset

Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	21 +50%	14−16 −50%
Metro Exodus	12 +50%	8−9 −50%
Red Dead Redemption 2	24−27 +38.9%	18−20 −38.9%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	17 +41.7%	12−14 −41.7%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	14−16 +50%	10−11 −50%
Battlefield 5	29 +61.1%	18−20 −61.1%
Far Cry 5	26 +44.4%	18−20 −44.4%
Far Cry New Dawn	27 +50%	18−20 −50%
Forza Horizon 4	27−30 +61.1%	18−20 −61.1%

4K
High Preset

Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	4 +100%	2−3 −100%
Metro Exodus	7 +40%	5−6 −40%
Red Dead Redemption 2	14−16 +40%	10−11 −40%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	8 +60%	5−6 −60%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	17 +41.7%	12−14 −41.7%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	9−10 +50%	6−7 −50%
Battlefield 5	14−16 +50%	10−11 −50%
Far Cry 5	12 +50%	8−9 −50%
Far Cry New Dawn	13 +44.4%	9−10 −44.4%
Forza Horizon 4	21−24 +50%	14−16 −50%

This is how GTX TITAN and GTX 1050 Ti Mobile compete in popular games:

GTX TITAN is 34% faster in 1080p
GTX TITAN is 20% faster in 1440p
GTX TITAN is 24% faster in 4K

Pros & cons summary

Performance score	21.20	15.32
Recency	19 February 2013	3 January 2017
Maximum RAM amount	6 GB	4 GB
Chip lithography	28 nm	14 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	250 Watt	75 Watt